透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.146.37.35
  • 期刊

台灣北部三縣市八年級學生社會學習領域課堂討論經驗與影響因素之調查研究

Eight-Grade Students' Experiences of Classroom Discussions and the Influences on their Participation: A Survey of Social Studies Learning Area in Taipei City, Taipei County, and Taoyuan County

摘要


公民參與高品質的公共對話來解決社會問題,是健全公民主社會的重要表徵。因此,以培育良好公民資質為主要核心的社會學習領域,應致力於發展學生參與公共事務討論的能力;討論教學法即是培養上種能力的有效途徑。關於討論教學法的研究,國外已有相當多的實證文獻;但國內除了少數介紹討論教學法的文獻外,對於此種教學法在課堂上的應用情形,特別是學生對此種教學法的觀點與參與課堂討論的實際經驗等,少有實證性的研究。緣此,本研究以台北市、台北縣和桃園縣三縣市國中階段社會學習領域的學生為對象,以問卷調查法實際了解我國社會領域課堂實施討論教學的情形,以及學生對教師實施討論式教學的評價和影響學生參與討論的因素等問題。研究結果發現:台北市、台北縣、桃園縣的學生對社會學習領域課堂討論持正向肯定的態度,但對於自己的意見和參與的價值,則有信心不足的傾向;三縣市的學生對社會學習領域教師引導課堂討論之評價,傾向於正面肯定;考試和成績因素、對討論的主題有興趣或缺乏興趣、同儕的評價、老師不客觀或愛批評學生和科目別,對學生是否參與討論具有關鍵的影響;社會學習領域三科中,公民科課堂討論的頻率最高,地理科其次,歷史科最低;社會領域課堂上曾經討論的議題中,百分比最高的五項議題分別為「環境保護」、「升學制度」、「全民健保」、「政黨之爭」和「家暴問題」。

並列摘要


Healthy democracies have many citizens engaged in high-quality public discourse of common problems. Discussion about public problems is positively linked to what citizens learn from one another and to the solution of important issues. Thus, it has been argued by many educators and scholars that the most important component of effective democratic citizenship preparation involves teaching students how to deliberate about the nature of the common good. That is, school curricula need to emphasize civic discourse, particularly face-to-face discussion. There are numerous empirical studies regarding teaching with discussion in social studies classrooms. However, none of them were done in Taiwan. Questions about how teachers apply discussion method in their classrooms and what experiences students have in terms of classroom discussion remain unknown. Thus, this study aims to answer the above-mentioned questions targeting on social studies classrooms and students. This study employed quantitative survey to inquire the reality of teaching with discussion in social studies classrooms in Taipei City, Taipei County and Taoyuan County. Results generated from this study indicate that students generally hold positive attitudes toward classroom discussions, and that the most influential factor in students' participation in classroom discussion is the pressure of examinations and grades, while teachers' gender is the least influential factor. In sum, students in the three surveyed city/counties share significantly similar experiences in classroom discussions.

參考文獻


王千倖(1996)。有效的小組討論教學。師友。353,4-49。
王金國(2000)。簡介小組討論教學法。教育研究。8,137-147。
沈文蓓(1997)。小學高年級學生小組討論之歷程分析(碩士論文)。國左台南師範學院國民教育研究所。
沈明珍(1989)。討論法在社會科教學的應用。教師之友。30(4),15-17。
教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。台北:教育部。

延伸閱讀