透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.17.6.75

摘要


本文的主要目的,在經由植物人的安樂死探討,而終於利用我國傳統儒家思想及外來的京教哲學,以建立吾人面對死亡的理論架構。文中首先以解剖及病態生理學的觀點來討論植物人形成的醫學基礎及其預後和處理原則;次由安樂死的簡要歷史回朔談其各種不同的施行方法,提供一個討論安樂死是否合法之基石。其次分析影響國人面對生死之種種思想體系,包括因有的道家、儒家及外傳之耶教和佛教,討論其理論及實際之優劣利弊。文中並推介傅偉動先生之生死學概念,尤以綜合祥學及道家思想,並賦予現代生活之意義,可引為吾人應及生命及死亡意義的參考。

關鍵字

植物人 安樂死 生死學 佛學

並列摘要


The persistent vegetative state is evaluated from the medical point of view. The principles of management for such patients recommended by American Academy of Neurology are presented. Various types of euthanasia and their ethical considerations are then discussed in order to provide a reasonable solution for euthanasia among people in persistent vegetative state. The second part of the article is focused on the possible beneficial impact of thanatology on the ordinary people when they are facing death. The advantages and limitations of Confucian theory, Daoism, Christianity, and Buddhism are evaluated in respect to their influence of Chinese when facing death. The different characters of various religions are discussed and the compatibility among them and scientific doctrines considered. The harmony between Zen and Daoism in their theories and actual performances may be very helpful in formulating the concept of ultimate meaning of living and death, and is essential for bringing peace to the dying process.

並列關鍵字

無資料

被引用紀錄


鄒亞珍(2012)。植物人主要照顧者之照顧歷程〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-2908201201333700

延伸閱讀


  • 王道仁、陳政忠、許浚翃、賴虹均、蕭儒鴻、張天鈞(1997)。安樂死是什麼?當代醫學(284),510-517。https://doi.org/10.29941/MT.199706.0021
  • 劉作揖(2016)。談安樂死與安寧死中華禮儀(34),31-37。https://doi.org/10.29420/CFC.201606_(34).0007
  • 賴和惠(1986)。安樂死之探討鵝湖月刊(129),47-55。https://doi.org/10.29652/LM.198603.0010
  • 賴惠玲(2007)。Must be Done志為護理-慈濟護理雜誌6(5),10-11。https://doi.org/10.6974/TCNJ.200710.0010
  • 梁瀚云(2014)。I die, Idie〔碩士論文,國立交通大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6842/NCTU.2014.00385

國際替代計量