Background and objective: Respiratory distress occurs frequently in patients after extubation and disconnection from mechanical ventilation. As long as it is not immediately life-threatening, physicians often have the choice of either a trial of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or direct re-intubation. This retrospective study aimed to compare these two treatment options in managing post-extubation respiratory distress in terms of weaning outcome and survival.Methods: Patients with post-extubation respiratory distress in intensive care units (ICU) over a 2-year period were enrolled in the study retrospectively by chart review. A total of 131 patients who experienced respiratory distress after extubation were screened. Among them, 67 patients were placed on NIV when respiratory distress occurred post-extubation, while 64 patients were directly re-intubated. Parameters analyzed included time to intervention after post-extubation respiratory distress (Tinv), time to re-intubation (Treint) and cumulative ventilator-free days after extubation in a 28-day period (Temvf).Results: Patients with post-extubation distress who were placed on NIV had lower rate of re-intubation (p<0.01), longer Temvf (p<0.01), and higher probability of ventilator-independent survival at the end of 28 days. Using univariate analysis of variables for endotracheal mechanical ventilation free survival in 28 days, we found that NIV (p<0.01) and re-intubation rate (p<0.01) were significantly correlated with final outcomes of weaning. Further analysis with multivariate logistic regression found that reduced rate of re-intubation was most predictive of ventilator-free survival at the end of 28 days (OR: 7.74, p<0.01).Conclusion: In our study, we demonstrated that early use of NIV in this situation can significantly reduce the rate of re-intubation and is associated with better weaning outcome and increased ventilator-independent survival.
Background and objective: Respiratory distress occurs frequently in patients after extubation and disconnection from mechanical ventilation. As long as it is not immediately life-threatening, physicians often have the choice of either a trial of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or direct re-intubation. This retrospective study aimed to compare these two treatment options in managing post-extubation respiratory distress in terms of weaning outcome and survival.Methods: Patients with post-extubation respiratory distress in intensive care units (ICU) over a 2-year period were enrolled in the study retrospectively by chart review. A total of 131 patients who experienced respiratory distress after extubation were screened. Among them, 67 patients were placed on NIV when respiratory distress occurred post-extubation, while 64 patients were directly re-intubated. Parameters analyzed included time to intervention after post-extubation respiratory distress (Tinv), time to re-intubation (Treint) and cumulative ventilator-free days after extubation in a 28-day period (Temvf).Results: Patients with post-extubation distress who were placed on NIV had lower rate of re-intubation (p<0.01), longer Temvf (p<0.01), and higher probability of ventilator-independent survival at the end of 28 days. Using univariate analysis of variables for endotracheal mechanical ventilation free survival in 28 days, we found that NIV (p<0.01) and re-intubation rate (p<0.01) were significantly correlated with final outcomes of weaning. Further analysis with multivariate logistic regression found that reduced rate of re-intubation was most predictive of ventilator-free survival at the end of 28 days (OR: 7.74, p<0.01).Conclusion: In our study, we demonstrated that early use of NIV in this situation can significantly reduce the rate of re-intubation and is associated with better weaning outcome and increased ventilator-independent survival.