Retrospectively records of 121 patients of prostate cancer and 127 patients of benign prostate hyperplasia, as a control group, were reviewed. Almost half (46.3%) of the prostate cancer were Stage D, and 46 cases (38%) were clinically localized cancer (Stages A, B) in this study. The cutoff point of prostate specific antigen (PSA) was set at 10 ng/ml to have higher specificity (81.9%) and accuracy rate (80.7%). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rate of digital rectal examinations (DRE) were 66.1%, 92.9% and 79.8%; the statistical results of transrectal sonography (TRUS) were 59.5%, 89.8% and 75%, respectively. Although there were significant differences in applying each of these three methods in detecting prostate cancer in its advanced stages compared with localized stages (DRE:P<0.001; TRS:P<0.001; PSA:P<0.05), there was no significant difference among these three methods in detecting prostate cancer in either the whole cancer group (X2(2)=3.2391, P>0.1) or the localized cancer subgroup (X2(2)=4.9785, P>0.05). Combining findings from DRE, PSA and TRUS, it is possible to predict cancer with the highest degree of accuracy (Odds ratio=124.3). These results have allowed development of clinical guidelines for accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Retrospectively records of 121 patients of prostate cancer and 127 patients of benign prostate hyperplasia, as a control group, were reviewed. Almost half (46.3%) of the prostate cancer were Stage D, and 46 cases (38%) were clinically localized cancer (Stages A, B) in this study. The cutoff point of prostate specific antigen (PSA) was set at 10 ng/ml to have higher specificity (81.9%) and accuracy rate (80.7%). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rate of digital rectal examinations (DRE) were 66.1%, 92.9% and 79.8%; the statistical results of transrectal sonography (TRUS) were 59.5%, 89.8% and 75%, respectively. Although there were significant differences in applying each of these three methods in detecting prostate cancer in its advanced stages compared with localized stages (DRE:P<0.001; TRS:P<0.001; PSA:P<0.05), there was no significant difference among these three methods in detecting prostate cancer in either the whole cancer group (X2(2)=3.2391, P>0.1) or the localized cancer subgroup (X2(2)=4.9785, P>0.05). Combining findings from DRE, PSA and TRUS, it is possible to predict cancer with the highest degree of accuracy (Odds ratio=124.3). These results have allowed development of clinical guidelines for accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer.