國小一年級國語文課程本位測量不同版本朗讀測驗之比較研究

本研究旨在比較國小第一冊和第二冊國語文課程本位測量，在康軒、翰林和國編三個版本的國字朗讀測驗和注意符號朗讀測驗之學習成效，以及同一測驗之正确率與流暢性的比較分析，本研究對象共包括台中縣、台中市、南投縣和彰化市之3218位國小一年級學生。研究資料分析乃運用雙异數分析考驗三個版本各九個單元在正确率和流暢性之差异．研究結果發現：（一）三個版本之間在國字朗讀測驗的正确率完全沒有顯著性差异，整體的學習成效乃是一致性偏高；國字朗讀測驗的流暢性比較，在第二冊第四單元之後，三個版本之間未再出現顯著性差异。（二）三個版本之間在注意符號朗讀測驗的正确率比較，僅在第一冊第一單元翰林版的表現顯著優于康軒版，其餘八個單元則完全沒有差异；比較注意符號朗讀測驗的流暢性，三個版本之間從第二冊第四單元起乃呈現無顯著性差异結果。（三）以同一版本的正确率和流暢性比較，三個版本的流暢性差异皆比正确率為多，亦以朗讀測驗而言，流暢性比正确率具備更高敏高度，也更可以敏銳偵測到受評者的學習成效。本研究最後提出兩點建議以供教師和家長參考。

關鍵字

國語文課程本位測量；國字朗讀測驗；注意符號朗讀測驗；國小一年級；正确率；流暢性

並列摘要

The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy and fluency of CBM reading test among three different publishes of chinese curriculum. The CBM reading test includes the Chinese character type and phonetic symbol type. The participants of this study have 3218 first graders from the Taichung city,Taichung county,Nantou county and Changhua county. The ANNOVA method is used to analyze the accuracy and fluency of reading test among the nine unites in total volume one and volume two. This study provides three findings: first, there is not significantly difference among the three publish curriculum of nine units in the accuracy of Chinese character type. The fluency has the similar effects. Second,there is not significantly difference among the three publish curriculum of eight units in the accuracy of phonetic symbol type. The fluency does not have significantly difference since the last three units of of phonetic symbol type. Third, the fluency is more sensitive than the accuracy in the CBM reading test of Chinese curriculum volume one and two. This study has two suggestions for the school teachers and parents.