透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.222.117.109
  • 期刊

朱熹靜坐法

The Form of Therapy to Sit Still Brought Up by Chu-His

摘要


朱熹「半日靜坐,半日讀書」之語,自清儒顏元批評其背離聖學,大張釋氏旗鼓,其言說原意,幾乎被大多數人所忽略。蓋朱熹此語,乃是針對個別弟子談論讀書方法時,隨機指點的說法;再者,單就靜坐工夫便遽以評斷,其為釋老之徒,未免言之太過,體證天理應當允許有方法上的通法、共法,儒、釋、道的分判,應取決於核心價值的殊異,而非外顯可見的方法操持。因此,本文談論「朱熹靜坐法」,也將從「朱熹靜坐的操持方法」與「朱熹靜坐的價值歸趨」兩個部分談起。 「半日靜坐,半日讀書」之語,其用心雖被後人曲意解讀,然而,此語卻給我們一個思考方向:如果說,讀書窮理之極,以達豁然貫通,只是半提;那麼,結合「收斂心氣」與「主敬涵養」,雙向調節「心」的已發、未發狀態,不失為體證天理的全提之法。朱熹靜坐,以收斂心氣為實踐操持,一方面從程頤處,確立了以「主敬」代「主靜」的大方向;另方面取益並轉化內丹學思想,著眼於人的現實生命,並肯定如果能夠讓一種逆反的宇宙開關歷程在人身上發生,那麼,稟受天理而來的人性,便有了體道、證道的可能,並從一個更高且普遍的層次來理解道德法則。

關鍵字

朱熹 靜坐 內丹學 核心價值

並列摘要


Most of people misunderstood the inner meaning of ”Sitting Still and Reading Comprehension”. In fact, those words were said to the specific person, not applied to everyone. Sitting still was a common form to fully aware of the nature, not regarded as religious rites. The form of therapy to sit still, brought up by Chu-Hsi, contained at least two aspects of ideas, one was the method of operation, and the other was the ultimate value. Speaking of the method of sitting still, Chu-Hsi considered that must be focused on the mind. Sitting still with a peaceful mind would help people have a clear look without disturbed. In Chu-His's opinion, ”holding in reverence” would keep the mind rule the root of human, cultivate the heart, and fully aware of the nature. The ultimate value of sitting still was to attain the moral code.

參考文獻


二程遺書(1985)。二程文集。北京:中華書局。
孔令宏(2001)。朱熹哲學與道家道教。保定:河北大學出版社。
朱熹、岡田武彥、荒木見悟主編(1977)。大學或問。中文出版社。
郭齊、尹波點校(1997)。朱熹集。四川教育出版社。
宋黎靖德編(1986)。朱子語類。文津出版社。

被引用紀錄


林世奇(2009)。從「內丹」到「內家」的義理詮釋〔博士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2009.01379
郭芳如(2013)。從鬼神觀論朱熹哲學及其宗教向度〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.02581
黃繼立(2010)。「身體」與「工夫」:明代儒學身體觀類型研究〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2010.03024

延伸閱讀


  • 禅天下編輯部(2008)。禪坐的姿勢禪天下(76),84-87。https://doi.org/10.30113/ZC.200808.0013
  • Yen, M. S. (1988). 坐禪. 中華佛學學報, (2), 312-330. https://doi.org/10.6986/CHBJ.198810.0312
  • 鍾永興(2017)。朱熹排佛思維下的儒理建構哲學與文化44(4),175-190。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10158383-201704-201704140012-201704140012-175-190
  • 黃錦鋐(1979)。Pedagogic Thoughts of Chu-hsi & his Influence教學與研究(1),1-19。https://doi.org/10.6250/TR.1979.1.1
  • 溫子琳(2015)。A Study of Chün-tzu in The Analects〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.02025

國際替代計量