透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.119.111.9
  • 期刊

國民年金方案的比較研究-政策論證的分析途徑

The Comparative Study of National Pension Alternatives: Approach of Policy Argumentative Analysis

摘要


隨著老年人口比例日益提高,但是新生兒愈來愈少之情況下,將導致老年人口未來扶養比率嚴重不足之問題產生。國民年金概念自1992年立委大選中被提出,發展至今已通過行政院之審議,並在2007年7月完成立法程序。該制度在規劃上主要由經建會及內政部負責規劃,政策規劃成果共計有「儲金制」、「稅收制」及現階段〈國民年金法草案(社保制)〉三個主要不同的規劃方案。 本研究應用W. Dunn之政策論證模式中之「價值批判」與「因果解釋」途徑來針對不同版本間之〈國民年金法草案〉,進行論證比較,以了解三版本之適宜性,以提供相關政策資訊。 在經由論證模式比較後,發現國民年金儲金制枉顧弱勢族群之權益,政治可行性較低;稅收制較具公平正義之特質,但易造成政府有失靈之虞;最後,現行〈國民年金法草案〉則是兼具前二者之長,較符合中庸之道,但缺乏強制力,則為該制度之重大缺陷。

並列摘要


The aged population ratio increased on Taiwan, but the neonatal population ratio reduced year by year. This situation may let aged-caring be an important policy issue in the future. In the legislator campaign in 1992, the claim of national pension has advocated for the first time. Up to now, the national pension has reached consensus in Executive Yuan and finished legitimization process in July, 2007. In process of policy planning, agencies of Council for Planning and Development and Ministry of the Interior have responsible for plan the National Pension Protocol. There are three alternatives for the initiation of National Pension System-”system of defined contribution”, ”system of taxation”, ”system of social insurance”. This article utilizes the modes of policy argumentative analysis developed by William Dunn to analyze the different alternatives of National Pension System. Especially the ”value-critical mode” and ”explanatory mode” of policy argument. And then to discuss the adaptability of three different alternatives. Through the comparative study and argumentative analysis, this article has three main findings. First, National Pension Protocol of defined contribution system is overleaping benefit of the disadvantaged minority, so the political feasibility will be a serious problem. Second, the system of taxation has the ethos of fair and justice, but the system of taxation is likely to raise the problem of government failure. At last, the system of social insurance have advantage of the others, therefore the system of social insurance is the ”middle way”, but it's drawback is a lack of compulsion.

參考文獻


工商時報()。
中國時報()。
王仕圖(2003)。政黨論替下的社會福利政策-以「中低收入戶老人生活津貼」為例。台灣社會福利學刊。4,79-105。
王信人()。
丘昌泰(2004)。公共政策-基礎篇。台北:巨流圖書有限公司。

被引用紀錄


林子揚(2010)。年金政策之比較研究及其對我國國民年金之啟示〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2010.00686
曾夢麟(2010)。我國國民年金制度對商業保險發展之影響-以國泰人壽為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2010.00190
劉湘榆(2015)。國民年金與相關社會保險年金化之研究〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/CYCU.2015.00074
郭昱賢(2016)。桃園航空城埤塘徵收爭議之政策論證〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-1005201615104051

延伸閱讀