多元就業開發社會型方案之回應性評估

The Responsive Evaluation of Social Type Multi-Employment Promotion Program

殷錦娟(Chin-Chuan Yin) ； 石振國(Chen-Kuo Shih)

《中華行政學報》 12期 (2013/06) Pp. 81-101

https://doi.org/10.6712/JCPA.201306_(12).0005

摘要

〈多元就業開發社會型方案〉是一種積極性的就業政策，透過非營利組織與政府之合作夥伴關係的建構，由非營利組織提出具創意性、地方性及發展性之計畫，引導弱勢者進入非營利組織工作，以創造在地就業機會，培養失業者再就業能力，紓解失業的經濟壓力，並要求非營利組織在補助結束持續雇用一定比例人員，以提供失業者就業管道。該方案自2002年開辦至今己歷十年，相關政策利害關係人如何評價其執行成效為本研究的主題。本研究以回應性評估理論為基礎，透過文獻分析與深度訪談等研究方法，探討政策制定者、執行機關及申請者等政策利害關係人的訴求、關切、爭議等回應性觀點，以期對該方案有更深入的瞭解。本研究發現：各方政策利害關係人對於〈多元就業開發方案〉之「社會型計畫」政策內涵的瞭解與詮釋有不同的見解與認知落差；這些落差反映出該計畫幾項不足之處，包含：誘因不足的問題、用人單位經費不足、任用受雇者之年限不足以培養足夠就業能力、政府未對用人單位與受雇者進行績效評鑑、未能提升受雇者在職場上的心態與專業性，針對前述問題，本研究並提供一些相關政策建議。

關鍵字

多元就業開發社會型方案 ； 政策評估 ； 回應性評估 ； 政策利害關係人

並列摘要

”Social Type Multi-Employment Promotion Program”, an active employment policy is an innovative, local and developmental program presented by non-profit organization through a structure of cooperative partnership between non-profit organization and the government, leading the disadvantaged to work in non-profit organization to create employment opportunities, cultivating the unemployed to have employabilities again for relieving their economic pressure, and requiring non-profit organization to maintain a certain percentage of employers after the end of subsidies for job opportunities of the unemployed.The program has been initiating for a decade since 2002. How the relevant policy stakeholders evaluate its performance effectiveness becomes a subjectof the study. This study based on responsive evaluation theory explores viewpoints of claims, concerns and issues responded from policy stakeholders, including policy makers, executive organizations and applicants etc. through research methods of literature review and in-depth interview for more understanding of this program.This study found that each policy stakeholder has difference in opinion and drop in awareness for understanding and interpretation about the content of ”social type” multi-employment promotion program; the gap reflects several inadequacies on this program, including problems of insufficient incentive, shortage of funds for employing unit, employment years of employer insufficient for employability, failure of performance assessment by the government to employing unit and employer, and unavailability of promoting employer's attitude and specialty in career. This study subject to the aforesaid problems provides some relevant policy suggestions.

並列關鍵字

Social Type Multi-Employment Promotion Program ； policy Evaluation ； Responsive Evaluation ； Policy Stakeholder

參考文獻

丘昌泰(2010)。公共政策：基礎篇。臺北:巨流。

宋永俊(2010)。非營利組織參與公私協力之監督機制研究─以苗栗地區多元就業開發方案（經濟型）為例(碩士論文)。東海大學公共事務碩士在職專班。

李允傑、丘昌泰(2009)。政策執行與評估。台北:元照。

林子婷(2011)。外籍配偶福利服務措施之回應性評估研究─以臺中市為例(碩士論文)。東海大學社會工作學系。

林澤州(2010)。多元就業開發方案培力社會企業之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系在職進修碩士班。