透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.149.233.72
  • 期刊

兒童少年福利服務資源網絡連結現況與影響因素之探討:以屏東縣為例

Study on the Present Situation of Child-Adolescent Welfare Service Resource Network Linkage and the Significant Factors-Take Pingtung County as an Example

摘要


為能夠瞭解兒童少年福利服務資源網絡連結現況與相關影響因素,本文以屏東縣境內有提供兒童少年福利服務的255個非營利組織為研究母體進行研究。為能獲取完整資料,採取普查方式。研究者參考相關文獻自行設計問卷,並透過郵寄問卷進行資料收集,歷經約六個月,共獲得有效樣本189個,回收率74.1%。研究結果發現,在189個有效樣本中,有67.2%為了組織運作,與其他組織產生了資源網絡連結;並且所連結的組織次數總共367次,其中以社會福利服務居多數,公部門占三分之一。促成連結的原因主要是尋求協助;連結方式是以電話、傳真、e-mail為主;產生的連結關係形態是以聯合計劃執行活動排名第一,其次依序為個案轉介、服務場地設備支援、資料刊物分享。此外,研究結果發現,服務方式數、立案主管機關、是否聘僱社工員是影響研究樣本連結組織數的重要因素;連結組織數則是影響連結結果滿意度的最重要因素。

並列摘要


To understand the present situation of child-adolescent service resource network linkage and its significant factors, 255 non-profit organizations which provide child-adolescent welfare service in Pingtung County are used as study samples. In order to obtain comprehensive information, census is used. The researcher refers to relevant literature and designs her own questionnaires forwarded by mail. Within 6 months, 189 valid samples are collected; the response rate is 74.1%. Among those 189 valid samples, 67.2% has formed resource network linkage with other organizations to maintain their own operation. The number they have linked themselves with other organizations is 367, in which most organizations belong to social welfare service, and governmental sectors account for one third. The reason of forming linkage is to look for assistance, and mainly through phone calls, faxes and e-mails. With regard to the types of linkage relationship, planning and executing activities together takes the first place, followed by case referral, service place and equipment support, and information & publications sharing. As for how many organizations the study sample would like to link with, it depends on the service project number, the authority concerned and the employment of social workers. What's more, the number of linkage organizations is the important factor that can influence the linkage satisfaction.

參考文獻


王仕圖(2004)。地方政府與非營利組織的資源網絡之研究:以嘉義市為例。非營利組織管理學刊。3,25-44。
邱瑜瑾(1999)。台中市非營利組織資源連結分析─社會網絡取向。國立政治大學社會學報。29,117-165。
蕭新煌編(2000)。非營利部門:組織與運作。台北:巨流。
郭靜晃、曾華源(2000)。建構社會福利資源網絡策略之探討。社區發展季刊。89,107-118。
章英華編、傅仰止編、瞿海源編(1995)。社會調查與分析:社會科學研究方法檢討與前瞻之一。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。

被引用紀錄


劉麗娟、蔡輝英(2022)。以社會網絡分析法探討原住民族家庭服務中心資源網絡:第一線社工觀點檢視社會政策與社會工作學刊26(1),89-146。https://doi.org/10.6785/SPSW.202206_26(1).0003

延伸閱讀