本論文主要檢討並評析我國農產品輸入契約,其所衍生的行政訴訟案例爭執,包含該標售契約之定性以及當事人在行政訴程序中提出的攻擊、防禦爭點,這些爭點包含有下列: 一、標售契約之定性,究屬私法契約或行政契約? 二、行政契約是否仍須適用法律保留原則? 三、此種定型化契約條款是否顯失公平而無效? 四、行政機關未事前告知重要資訊,是否構成誠信原則之違反? 五、行政契約是否得適用信賴保護原則? 六、提早終止標售契約之效力,是否構成給付不能? 七、我國突然加入WTO是否屬情事變更? 本論文針對台北高等行政法院92年度訴字第5733號判決及最高行政法院95年度判字第00815號判決之法律見解進行分析並提出個人之批評意見。
This article mainly reviews and comments on Taiwan's agricultural import contracts and administrative litigation cases derived from the contracts. Qualification of the contract and arguments from both parties in the administrative litigation process are of concern. Specific issues are as the following, 1. Characterization of the sale tender contract. Is the contract private contract or administrative contract? 2. Does the principle of legal reservation still apply to administrative contract? 3. Is this kind of adhesion contract obviously unfair to one party so it should be void? 4. The administrative agency did not inform the contracting party important information beforehand. Is this against of the principle of good faith? 5. Does the principle of trust-in-protection apply to administrative contract? 6. Does termination of the sale tender contract ahead of time constitute a breach of contract? 7. Does Taiwan's unexpected joining to WTO constitute a change of the condition? This is an article with legal analysis and the author's comments on decisions from Taipei Administrative High Court and Taipei Administrative Supreme Court. (Case numbers are respectively 92 No. 5733 and 95 No.00815)