身心障礙職業輔導評量時數與評量方法選擇探討－以高雄市博愛職業訓練中心職評服務爲例

Method Selection and Time Spending in Vocational Evaluation Services for Individuals with Disabilities at the Po-Ai Vocational Training Center in Kaohsiung

王敏行(Ming-Hung Wang) ； 王建中(Jian-Zhong Wang) ； 黃美慧(Mei-Hui Huang)鍾和村(Han-Cun Zhong)

《復健諮商》 第2期 (2008/12) Pp. 77-91

https://doi.org/10.30123/RC.200812.0004

摘要

本研究主要目的在透過對92-94年高雄市博愛職業訓練中心381份職評報告分析，探討職評員針對不同障礙類別與障礙程度個案提供職評服務時，在評量時數與評量方法使用之情形。研究發現個案職評時數與各項職評方法平均時數，皆在法規規定範圍內，但情境與現場試做評量平均時數與Brown, McDaniel和King (1995)相比偏低，且肢體障礙個案與智能障礙個案比較，障礙類別與障礙程度間皆未發現差異。文中就情境與現場試做評量上的議題進行討論。

關鍵字

身心障礙者 ； 職業輔導評量 ； 職評方法

並列摘要

The purpose of the study was to investigate vocational evaluators' selection and time spending of assessment methods according to different disability types and severity levels. Based on 381 vocational evaluation reports from the Po-Ai Vocational Training Center in Kaohsiung city during 2003-2005, the results showed the average time used for each method for every clients met the allowed time set by the regulations; however, the total hours spent for each client in situational assessment and job try-out were much less than the findings from Brown, McDaniel and King (1995). It was also found there was no difference in time spending for these two assessment methods between clients with physical disability and mental retardation in disability type or severity level. The issues regarding the use of situational assessment and job try-out were discussed.

並列關鍵字

persons with disabilities ； vocational assessment ； vocational assessment methods