透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.134.118.95
  • 期刊

合作學習及精熟學習對大學生之籃球技能學習成效

Comparisons between Cooperative Learning and Mastering Learning for Basketball Performance of Collegial Students

摘要


本研究目的旨在探討不同教學策略與不同能力組別學生籃球學習成效之交互作用情形。研究對象為北部某科科技大學籃球選修課學生,合計120人,採用2×3因子設計(學習策略x技能水準),研究方法為實驗研究法,資料分析採用平均數、標準差、單因子變異數分析、雙因子變異數分析,研究結果指出:一、合作學習組中,高能力組及高低能力組學生之籃球技能學習成效優於低能力組學生;精熟學習組中,高能力組及高低能力組學生之籃球技能學習成效優於低能力組學生;二、合作學習組學生之學習成效優於精熟學習組;三、高能力組及高低能力組學生之學習成效皆優於低能力組。結論:合作學習組學生之籃球技能學習成效優於精熟學習組學生,未來體育教師可以利用合作學習之教學策略,提升學生的籃球學習成效,亦可將異質學生(高低能力)分成一組,提升學生之學習成效。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study was to compare the basketball performances between cooperative learning and mastering learning. The subjects were 120 students who selected the basketball programs, and those were divide 6 groups, such as cooperative learning group-high level, cooperative learning group-low level, cooperative learning group-combinative level, mastery learning group- high level, mastery learning group- low level, and mastery learning group- combinative level. The research method was experimental method. Those data were analyzed by average, standard deviation, one-way ANOVA, and 2-way ANOVA. The results were as in the following: (a) the basketball performances of cooperative learning grouphigh level, and cooperative learning group-combinative level were better than it of cooperative learning group-low level. In addition, the basketball performances of mastering learning group-high level, and mastering learning group-combinative level were better than it of mastering learning group-low level. (2) The basketball performance of cooperative learning group was better than it of mastering leaning group. (3) The basketball performances of high level group and combinative level group were better than it of low level group. In summary, the basketball performance of cooperative learning group was better than it of mastering group. It advised that physical education teachers could use the cooperative learning strategy to improve the basketball learning of the low ability students.

參考文獻


洪新來(2007)。獎勵結構與親和力在合作學習成效之研究。體育學報,24,39-52。
教育部(1997)。籃球:教材教法與評量。國立臺灣師範大學學校體育研究與發展中心主編。台北。
黃政傑、林佩璇(1995)。合作學習。台北市:五南。
黃清雲(1998)。掌握有效合作學習要素創造體育教學新境界。臺灣省學校體育,8(3),4-13。
鄭麗媛(2008)。合作學習與訊息策略運用對韻律體操動作技能學習成效之影響。體育學報,第41 卷第3 期,頁69∼80。

被引用紀錄


黃莉鈞(2013)。範例式問題導向學習策略中合作解題分組方式對大學生邏輯解題能力之影響〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2013.00448
丁春月(2014)。二年級國語文造句教學之行動研究〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613574920

延伸閱讀