透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.133.131.168
  • 期刊

論數位環境下個人資料保護法制之發展與難題-以「數位足跡」之評價為核心

Study on Legal Evaluation of Digital Footprint under the Personal Information Protection Act in Taiwan

摘要


過往,個人資料均以紙本等實體形式呈現,當人類文化跨入數位時代,隨著人們習於以數位方式記錄生活,無論是眞實社會的舉措,抑或虛擬網路空間的言行,均逐步轉變爲可供搜尋與解析的「數位足跡」,印證了「凡走過必留下痕跡」此一民衆耳熟能詳的話語,不僅存在實體世界,亦於虛擬的數位環境得到印證。在資料探勘等相關技術普及應用下,園繞當事人展開的數位足跡,衍生創造諸多新穎應用型態,然而儲存方式的變革與雲端應用等新興技術概念的問世,卻也加深數位足跡遭到不當利用之風險。爲因應資訊時代的巨變,包括隱私權概念與各國對應保護立法,有不一程度之調整或變革,我國亦不例外。本文以國內於2010年修正通過的新版個人資料法爲出發點,探討「數位足跡」於新法下之評價,以及在數位浪潮下,個人資料保護法制發展殊値關注的重要議題,最終提出筆者之看法與建言。

並列摘要


The civilization of human society closely correlates with the record and the transferring mode of information. Personal information used to be recorded in paper or other physical carriers, along with the common utilization of internet and digital technology in the 1990s, people started to handle their personal information with computer and large quantities of personal information were collected by digital devices. Nowadays, under the so-called ubiquitous network society, when we exploring websites, using cell-phone or paying with our credit cards, our daily activities are recorded as ”digital footprints” while we interacting in the digital environment. With the increase of digital footprint, the collection, processing and using of digital footprint also raise lots of issues: is digital footprint a protected personal information under domestic privacy legislation? Can we collect or use others' digital footprint without their consent? Whether or not the design of the privacy law can equally apply to the physical world and the digital environment becomes a significant challenge to each countries. Taiwan established the Computer-Processed Personal Information Protection Act in 1995 and the Act was amended in 2010. This article will try to ascertain the legal evaluation of digital footprint under the newest Personal Information Protection Act and discuss how to respond to digital trends. The author will also provide some of personal points of view toward the future development of privacy legislation in Taiwan.

參考文獻


CAVOUKIAN, ANN,HAMILTON, TYLER J.(2002).PRIVACY PAYOFF: HOW SUCCESSFUL BUSINESSES BUILD CUSTOMER TRUST.
Google does that for us: it makes everything in the world accessible to everyone, and everyone accessible to the world. But we see everyone looking in, and blame Google. See William Gibson, Google's Earth, THE NEW YORK TIMES, Nov. 31 2011, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/01/opinion/01gibson.html(last visited Dec. 01, 2011).
林達峰(2006)。簡介日本「u-Japan政策」。科技法律透析。18(1),9。
總務省(2004)。u-Japan政策2010年ユビキタスネツト社会の実現に向けて
堀部政男(2008)。ユビキタス社会と法的課題―OECDのインターネット経済政策による補完。ジュリスト。1361,2-4。

被引用紀錄


喻祖蒂(2014)。從歐盟及英國電子隱私法制論網路追蹤式廣告之隱私保護〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201400093
黃則馨(2013)。數位足跡之發展及運用與對隱私權的威脅〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.02508
陳仕弘(2023)。數位治理中政府監理政策探討-以數位足跡為觀察管理資訊計算12(),22-30。https://doi.org/10.6285/MIC.202308/SP_02_12.0003

延伸閱讀