參考文獻
EUROPEAN COMMISSION [EC], COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS, Making the most of the EU's innovative potential - An intellectual property action plan to support the EU's recovery and resilience, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0760&from=EN (last visited May 16, 2022).
楊宏暉，〈標準關鍵專利之濫用與限制競爭〉，《公平交易季刊》，第23卷第4期，頁38 (2015)，可參見https://www.ftc.gov.tw/upload/19c124ad-477c-4243-ad85-d434d6614c47.pdf (最後瀏覽日：2022/05/16)。
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [USDOJ], DRAFT POLICY STATEMENT ON LICENSING NEGOTIATIONS AND REMEDIES FOR STANDARDS-ESSENTIAL PATENTS SUBJECT TO VOLUNTARY FRAND COMMITMENTS (2021), https://www.justice.gov/atr/page/file/1453471/download (last visited May 16, 2022).
PUBLIC COMMENTS - DRAFT POLICY STATEMENT ON LICENSING NEGOTIATIONS AND REMEDIES FOR STANDARDS-ESSENTIAL PATENTS, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, https://www.justice.gov/atr/guidelines-and-policy-statements-0/public-comments-draft-policy-statement-licensing-negotiations-and-remedies-standards-essential (last visited May 16, 2022).
Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy, The White House, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/07/09/executive-order-on-promoting-competition-in-the-american-economy/ (last visited May 16, 2022).
延伸閱讀
- 周碧凰（2023）。談美國專利申請案類別發明限制性選擇要求回應方式及產生的效果。萬國法律，(249)，50-57。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=15606473-N202306150013-00004
- 陳怡玫（2007）。簡介美國專利審查規則修訂草案。科技法律透析，19(8)，13-17。https://doi.org/10.7062/STLR.200708.0013
- 王偉哲（2017）。美國發明法下之專利有效性──以專利審理暨訴願委員會為中心〔碩士論文，國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201700700
- 陳秉訓（2005）。美國聯邦巡迴上訴法院E-Pass Techs.v.3Com Corp.案之分析－兼談專利說明書之撰寫。法令月刊，56(4)，79-86。https://doi.org/10.6509/TLM.200504_56(4).0007
- 洪麗玲（1996）。美國專利商標局提電腦應用發明之審查基凖修正草案。資訊法務透析，8(7)，10-10。https://doi.org/10.7062/INFOLAW.199607.0013