透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.142.43.206
  • 期刊

宋澤萊的「台語文學論」與其實踐:以〈抗暴的打貓市〉為例

Sòng Tik-lâi's Theory and Practice of "Taiwanese Literature": Exploring "Khòng-pō ê Tánn-niau-tshī" (The Revolt in Tánn-niau City)

摘要


1987年發表之〈抗暴的打貓市〉是戰後現代台語小說的先鋒之作,宋澤萊在其中以複雜的文學技巧、先行於時代的美學,呈現出對政治、人權以至於民族議題的關懷;並且,此作也是宋澤萊「台語文學論」的徹底實踐。本文從宋澤萊的文學論述出發,探討其如何以人權文學論、民族文學論為基礎,發展出「台語文學論」;再分析〈抗暴的打貓市〉一文之主題關懷與意象運用,最後申論宋澤萊的創作如何印證其文學理念。本文主張,宋澤萊的「台語文學論」與其人權文學論、民族文學論為一貫思考,且因文學語言的特殊性,具備更加基進的意義。〈抗暴的打貓市〉在內容與形式上都是宋澤萊文學論的實踐,其在宋澤萊創作史以及台灣文學史上的定位,值得進一步被重視與肯定。

並列摘要


Published in 1987, "Khòng-pō ê Tánn-niau-tshī" is a pioneering work of postwar Taiwanese novel. Not only did Song Tik-lâi (Song Ze-lai) express his concern about politics, human rights and ethnics with elaborate writing skills and advanced aesthetics, this work was also a complete practice of Song Tik-lâi's "Taiwanese literature theory." This article starts from Sòng's literary perspectives and explores how he developed "Taiwanese literature theory" on the basis of human rights literature theory and national literature theory. Then, the topics and images of "Khòng-pō ê Tánn-niau-tshī" are discussed. Lastly, this article explains how this work well corroborates Sòng's literature theories. This article argues that Sòng's Taiwanese literature theory shows consistency with his human rights literature theory and national literature theory; furthermore, the use of Taiwanese makes it even more radical. "Khòng-pō ê Tánn-niau-tshī" is a practice of Sòng's literature theories, both in contents and in form, and its importance in Sòng's writing history and Taiwanese literature history should be revalued and further recognized.

參考文獻


葉石濤,1977,〈台灣鄉土文學史導論〉,《夏潮》,第 14 期,頁 68-75。[Yeh, Shih-tao. (1977). An Introduction to Taiwan Nativist Literature History. The China Tide, 14, 68-75.]
葉石濤,1981,《作家的條件》,台北:遠景。[Yeh, Shih-tao. (1981). The Conditions of a Writer. Taipei: Vista.]
葉石濤,1985.10.29-31,〈走過紛爭歲月,邁向多元年代——台灣文學的回顧與前瞻〉,《自立晚報》,第10版。[Yeh, Shih-tao. (1985.10.29-31). Walk through the Days of Dispute; March toward the Era of Diversity: Review and Foresight of Taiwan Literature. Independence Evening Post, p. 10.]
葉石濤,1987,《台灣文學史綱》,高雄:春暉。[Yeh, Shih-tao. (1987). An Outline History of Taiwan Literature. Kaohsiung: Chun Hui.]
游勝冠,1996,《台灣文學本土論的興起與發展》,台北:前衛。[Yu, Sheng-kuan. (1996). The Rise and Development of Taiwan Nativist Literary Discourse. Taipei: Avanguard.]

延伸閱讀