Home            Contact us            FAQs
    
      Journal Home      |      Aim & Scope     |     Author(s) Information      |      Editorial Board      |      MSP Download Statistics

     Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology


Development of a Restructured Protein Based on Low Cost Legumes

De Paula Claudia, Pastrana Yenis, Durango-Villadiego Alba, Carcamo Keidith and Dickson Shirley
University of Cordoba, Km 12 Road (Cereté-Ciénaga de Oro) -Córdoba-Colombia
Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology  2018  SPL:178-184
http://dx.doi.org/10.19026/ajfst.16.5953  |  © The Author(s) 2018
Received: ‎September 14, 2017  |  Accepted: January 19, 2018  |  Published: November 10, 2018

Abstract

The aim of this research was to elaborate a vegetable restructured protein with low cost leguminous plants, using cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.), pea (Pisum sativum L.) and lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.). Child malnutrition has it’s origins on the scarcity of economic resources, the lack of various foodstuffs in one region and also due to the government’s promotion and prevention policies that do not meet the full coverage of the most vulnerable regions. The raw and restructured materials were bromatologically characterized on three formulations: F1 (25% cowpea, 25% pea and 25% lentil), F2 (50% cowpea and 25% pea) and F3 (50% cowpea and 25% lentil). A sensory acceptance test was carried out with 50 potential tasters using a 9-point hedonic scale which evaluated attributes of appearance, color, aroma, texture and flavor. We used a randomized block design with three replicates, data were subjected to variance analysis and Tukey's test (p≤0.05). The lentil, pea and cowpea protein content was 30.94±0.30%, 28.96±0.16% and 26.21±0.40%, respectively. On the acceptance test with the hedonic scale, the tasters did not find significant differences (p≥0.05) between the attributes of color, appearance, aroma, texture and flavor. The Acceptability Index presented significant differences (p≤0.05) between formulations three and one and formulation two differed statistically (p≥0.05) from formulations one and three. The Only flavor had a significant difference (p≤0.05), in which formulation three was highlighted.

Keywords:

Bromatological characterization, formulation, hedonic scale, sensory acceptance, taster,


References


Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.

ISSN (Online):  2042-4876
ISSN (Print):   2042-4868
Submit Manuscript
   Information
   Sales & Services
Home   |  Contact us   |  About us   |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2024. MAXWELL Scientific Publication Corp., All rights reserved