本文建構一個異質混合的雙占模型，市場中包含一家民營化廠商以及一家民營廠商在該市場進行Cournot數量競爭。兩家廠商皆可以進行策略性地環境企業的社會責任 (Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility, ECSR) 來提高消費者對該企業所生產的產品之願付價格。政府可以透過對兩家廠商每單位的產出水準之補貼政策來矯正市場的扭曲。在這樣的環境下重新探討在最適補貼政策之下社會的福利水準是否會受到民營化程度的影響，也就是民營化中立性定理是否會成立。文中探討兩種階段性的賽局結構，其一為產出決策與ECSR決策同時選擇以及先選擇ECSR決策再選擇產出決策的序列性賽局結構。
依據本文的研究結果顯示: 當生產行為不具有外部性時，在最適補貼政策之下，民營化程度的高低並不會影響到社會的福祉，換言之，民營化中立性定理成立；反之，當生產行為具有負的外部性時，民營化程度的高低則會影響到社會的福利水準，也就是說，民營化中立性定理不成立。而上述結果與廠商競爭策略中的ECSR與產出決策為同時決定的賽局結構，抑或是序列性的賽局結構無關。

This paper constructs a heterogeneous and mixed dual-oligopoly model. The model includes a privatized manufacturer and a private manufacturer to conduct a Cournot quantity competition. Both of them can strategically compete in environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR) to increase consumers' willingness to pay for the products made by the company. The government would correct the distortion by subsidizing the output level of the two manufacturers. Under the circumstance, we can re-examine that whether the social welfare level will be affected by the degree of privatization under the optimal subsidy policy, that is, whether the privatization neutrality theorem will be established. This article discusses two phased game structures. One is the sequential game structure where the output and the ECSR decisions are selected simultaneously, the other is ECSR decision is selected first and then the output decision is selected.
According to the research results of this paper, we can find that:
(1) Under the optimal subsidy policy, when the act of production does not have negative externality, the degree of privatization will not affect the social welfare. In other words, the privatization neutrality theorem established.
(2) Under the optimal subsidy policy, when the act of production has a negative externality, the degree of privatization will affect the social welfare level. That is to say, the privatization neutrality theorem does not established.
(3) The above results will be equal whether the ECSR and output decisions were made in the same time or in sequential order.

第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究動機 1
1.2研究架構 2
第二章 文獻回顧 3
第三章 基本模型 6
第四章 部分民營化下異質混合寡占市場 9
4.1 CSR異質混合寡占 9
4.2 ECSR異質混合寡占 15
第五章 部分民營化下異質混合寡占市場—廠商序列性決策 19
5.1 CSR異質混合寡占 19
5.2 ECSR異質混合寡占 23
第六章 結論 27
參考文獻 28

邱俊榮, & 黃鴻. (2006). 公營廠商民營化的最適釋股比例分析. 經濟論文叢刊, 34(2), 245-259.
胡憲倫, 許家偉, & 蒲彥穎. (2006). 策略的企業社會責任: 企業永續發展的新課題. 應用倫理研究通訊, 40, 37-50.
侯雨君、翁堃嵐與郭虹. (2020). 策略性的環境企業社會責任與民營化中立性定理
翁永和, 羅鈺珊, & 劉碧珍. (2003). 市場結構與最適民營化政策. 經濟論文, 31(2), 149-169.
翁堃嵐, 林宛儀, & 郭虹瑩. (2014). 混合寡占市場下利潤稅的中立性與最適釋股比例. 應用經濟論叢, (96), 105-126.
Alves, C., & Santos-Pinto, L. (2008). A theory of corporate social responsibility in oligopolistic markets. Letöltve: http://citeseerx. ist. psu. edu/viewdoc/down-load.
Anderson, S. P., De Palma, A., & Thisse, J. F. (1995). Privatization and efficiency in a differentiated industry. Centre for Economic Policy Research.
Becker-Olsen, K. L., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of sponsor fit on brand equity: The case of nonprofit service providers. Journal of service research, 9(1), 73-83.
Cremer, H., Marchand, M., & Thisse, J. F. (1989). The public firm as an instrument for regulating an oligopolistic market. Oxford Economic Papers, 283-301.
De Fraja, G., & Delbono, F. (1989). Alternative strategies of a public enterprise in oligopoly. Oxford Economic Papers, 41(2), 302-311.
Fjell, K., & Heywood, J. S. (2004). Mixed oligopoly, subsidization and the order of firm's moves: the relevance of privatization. Economics Letters, 83(3), 411-416.
Fujiwara, K. (2007). Partial privatization in a differentiated mixed oligopoly. Journal of Economics, 92(1), 51-65.
Garella, P. G., & Petrakis, E. (2008). Minimum quality standards and consumers’ information. Economic Theory, 36(2), 283-302.
Häckner, J. (1999). A note on price and quantity competition in differentiated oligopolies. Department of economics, Stockholm University.
Hirose, K., Lee, S. H., & Matsumura, T. (2017). Environmental corporate social responsibility: A note on the first-mover advantage under price competition. Economics Bulletin, 37(1), 214-221.
Kopel, M. (2009). Strategic CSR, spillovers, and first-mover advantage. Available at SSRN 1408632.
Matsumura, T. (1998). Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. Journal of Public Economics, 70(3), 473-483.
Matsumura, T., & Kanda, O. (2005). Mixed oligopoly at free entry markets. Journal of Economics, 84(1), 27-48.
Nie, P. Y., Wang, C., & Meng, Y. (2019). An analysis of environmental corporate social responsibility. Managerial and Decision Economics, 40(4), 384-393.
Nishitani, K., Jannah, N., & Kaneko, S. (2017). Does corporate environmental performance enhance financial performance? An empirical study of Indonesian firms. Environmental Development, 23, 10-21.
Pal, D., & White, M. D. (1998). Mixed oligopoly, privatization, and strategic trade policy. Southern Economic Journal, 264-281.
Robertson, T. S., & Gatignon, H. (1986). Competitive effects on technology diffusion. Journal of Marketing, 50(3), 1-12.
Wang, H., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R., & George, G. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: An overview and new research directions thematic issue on corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 534–544.
White, M. D. (1996). Mixed oligopoly, privatization and subsidization. Economics letters, 53(2), 189-195.