帳號:guest(18.117.183.252)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者(中):蔡咏諭
作者(英):Tsai, Yung-Yu
論文名稱(中):教學支出對大學校院畢業生就業與薪資之影響:以獎勵大學教學卓越計畫為例
論文名稱(英):The effect of instructional expenditure on college graduates’ employment and earnings: Evidence from the Plan to Encourage Teaching Excellence in Universities
指導教授(中):朱斌妤
楊子霆
指導教授(英):Chu, Pin-Yu
Yang, Tzu-Ting
口試委員:朱斌妤
楊子霆
連賢明
陳敦源
韓幸紋
口試委員(外文):Chu, Pin-Yu
Yang, Tzu-Ting
Lien, Hsien-Ming
Chen, Don-Yun
Han, Hsing-wen
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立政治大學
系所名稱:公共行政學系
出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:英文
論文頁數:93
中文關鍵詞:高等教育教學支出畢業生薪資教學卓越計畫
英文關鍵詞:Higher educationInstructional expenditureGraduates’ earningsTeaching Excellence Project
Doi Url:http://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU201900156
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:95
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:9
  • gshot_favorites title msg收藏:0
高等教育經費占我國政府支出,瞭解此一花費是否能有助於大學校院畢業生之就業與薪資實乃重要課題。本論文利用教學卓越計畫作為一自然實驗,建構教學支出之外生工具變數。本論文藉由串連大學校院之財報數據以及稅務行政資料,檢驗教學支出對大學校院畢業生之就業與薪資之影響。
研究結果發現,教學支出對畢業生就業市場表現之影響微乎其微。教育經費的投入,對畢業生的薪資與就業均不產生影響。教育資源的效果僅體現在幫助畢業生脫離低薪與貧窮的處境。整體而言,每增加10萬元的教學支出,畢業生平均每月薪資超過中位數的可能性,將提高2.83個百分點。對於來自經濟弱勢家庭的學生而言,每增加10萬元的教學支出,畢業生年總薪資超過中位數的可能性,將提高3.62個百分點。教學資源對對經濟弱勢學生的效果,是對來自相對富裕家庭學生的5.25倍。本論文的發現點出教育資源的投入或許無法廣泛地對所有學生產生正面助益,但卻能夠幫助社會中最底層的族群。
Given the considerable amount of money spent on higher education, understanding the effects of educational investment on graduates’ future achievement is important. This thesis uses the Teaching Excellence Project as a natural experiment to generate an exogenous variation in instructional expenditure. By linking the data on higher education institutions’ expenditure as well as taxation administrative records of individual income, this thesis investigates the effects of instructional expenditure on college graduates’ employment and earnings.
The result suggests that the effect of instructional expenditure on students’ labor market outcomes is weak. No evidence supports the expenditure effect on graduates’ earnings and employment. The educational resources effect only appears in helping individuals get rid of low income. For all graduates, increasing per-graduate instructional expenditure by 100 thousand leads to 2.83 percentage points increases in the probability of reaching the median of monthly earnings. For graduates from economically disadvantaged families, increasing per-graduate instructional expenditure by 100 thousand leads to 3.62 percentage points increases in the probability of reaching the median of annual earnings. The magnitude of effect size for disadvantaged students is 5.25 times greater than rich students. These findings imply that educational investment in higher education does not have extensively effect on all students but does benefit the underprivileged in society.
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1. Research Background and Motivation 1
1.2. Research Purposes and Questions 3
1.3. Significance of the Research 4
Chapter 2 Literature Review 6
2.1. The Relationship between Education Inputs and Student Outcomes 6
2.1.1. The Education Production Function 6
2.1.2. Measurement of Student Outcomes 8
2.1.3. Measurement of School Resources 10
2.1.4. Effects of Instructional Expenditure on Labor Market Outcomes 13
2.2. The Relationship between Government Funding and Instructional Spending 15
2.2.1. The Crowd-out Effect 15
2.2.2. The Flypaper Effect 16
Chapter 3 Policy Background 17
3.1. Higher Education in Taiwan 17
3.1.1. Background and Development 17
3.1.2. Revenue and Funding of HEIs 20
3.1.3. Expenditure of HEIs 22
3.2. Plan to Encourage Teaching Excellence in Universities 23
3.2.1. Funding Allocation and Regulation 24
3.2.2. Project Performance and Effect 27
Chapter 4 Research Design 29
4.1. Empirical Design 29
4.2. Sample 32
4.3. Data and Descriptive Statistics 36
Chapter 5 Research Results 42
5.1. First Stage 42
5.2. Labor Market Outcomes 45
5.2.1. Annual Earnings 46
5.2.2. Monthly Earnings 48
5.2.3. Probability of Getting High Earnings 50
5.2.4. Employment Intensity 54
5.3. Subgroup Analysis 57
5.3.1. Family Background 57
5.3.2. Students from Different Fields of Study 61
Chapter 6 Discussion and Conclusion 63
6.1. Research Findings 63
6.2. Limitations of the Study 66
6.3. Recommendations for Future Studies and Polices 69
Reference 73
Appendix 80
Arcalean, C., & Schiopu, I. (2010). Public versus private investment and growth in a hierarchical education system. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34(4), 604-622.
Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), 9-49.
Behrman, J. R., Rosenzweig, M. R., & Taubman, P. (1996). College choice and wages: Estimates using data on female twins. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(4), 672-685.
Bennell, P. (1998). Rates of return to education in Asia: A review of the evidence. Education Economics, 6(2), 107-120.
Betts, J. R. (1995). Does school quality matter? Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(2), 231-250.
Bloom, D. E., Hartley, M., & Rosovsky, H. (2007). Beyond private gain: The public benefits of higher education. In J. J. F. Forest & P. G. Altbach (Eds.), International handbook of higher education (pp. 293-308). Dordrecht: Springer.
Bowen, H. (2018). Investment in learning: The individual and social value of American higher education. London: Routledge.
Bowles, S. (1970). Towards an educational production function (Report No. OEC 1-7-000451-2651). Washington, D.C.: US Office of Education
Brand, J. E., & Xie, Y. (2010). Who benefits most from college? Evidence for negative selection in heterogeneous economic returns to higher education. American Sociological Review, 75(2), 273-302.
Card, D., & Krueger, A. B. (1992). Does school quality matter? Returns to education and the characteristics of public schools in the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 100(1), 1-40.
Card, D., & Krueger, A. B. (1996). Labor market effects of school quality: Theory and evidence. In G. Burtless (Ed.), Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success (pp. 97-140). Washington, D.C: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Card, D., & Krueger, A. B. (1998). School resources and student outcomes. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 559(1), 39-53.
Card, D., & Payne, A. A. (2002). School finance reform, the distribution of school spending, and the distribution of student test scores. Journal of Public Economics, 83(1), 49-82.
Chang, Y.-C., & Lin, T.-H. (2015). How does the expansion of higher education reproduce class inequality? The case of Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education, 15(2), 85-128.
Charkins, R., O'Toole, D. M., & Wetzel, J. N. (1985). Linking teacher and student learning styles with student achievement and attitudes. Journal of Economic Education, 16(2), 111-120.
Chen, H.-h., & Zhang, G.-M. (2016). A review of the Plan to Encourage Teaching Excellence in Universities (Report No. 105-Edu-Inv-0024). Taipei: The Control Yuan.
Cheng, Y.-F., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2017). Decision tree for investigating the factors affecting graduate salaries. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 62(2), 125-151.
Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E. (2014a). Measuring the impacts of teachers I: Evaluating bias in teacher value-added estimates. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2593-2632.
Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E. (2014b). Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2633-2679.
Chi, C.-H. (2008). A study on current status and influential factors of implementing the university teaching excellence program. (Unpublished master's dissertation), National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.
Connolly, L. S. (1997). Does external funding of academic research crowd out institutional support? Journal of Public Economics, 64(3), 389-406.
Dadgar, M., & Trimble, M. J. (2015). Labor market returns to sub-baccalaureate credentials: How much does a community college degree or certificate pay? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(4), 399-418.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, online publication. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000
Dee, T. S. (2005). Expense preference and student achievement in school districts. Eastern Economic Journal, 31(1), 23-44.
Devadoss, S., & Foltz, J. (1996). Evaluation of factors influencing student class attendance and performance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78(3), 499-507.
DGBAS. (2018). Financial statement of central government, FY2017. Taipei: Directorate General of Budget Accounting and Statistics.
Eide, E. R., & Showalter, M. H. (2005). Does improving school quality reduce the probability of unemployment? Contemporary Economic Policy, 23(4), 578-584.
Goodspeed, T. J. (1998). The relationship between state income taxes and local property taxes: Education finance in New Jersey. National Tax Journal, 51(2), 219-238.
Grogger, J. (1996). School expenditures and post-schooling earnings: Evidence from high school and beyond. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(4), 628-637.
Grubb, W. N. (1993). The long-run effects of proprietary schools on wages and earnings: Implications for federal policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(1), 17-33.
Hægeland, T., Raaum, O., & Salvanes, K. G. (2012). Pennies from heaven? Using exogenous tax variation to identify effects of school resources on pupil achievement. Economics of Education Review, 31(5), 601-614.
Hanushek, E. A. (1979). Conceptual and empirical issues in the estimation of educational production functions. Journal of Human Resources, 14(3), 351-388.
Hanushek, E. A. (1986). The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24(3), 1141-1177.
Hanushek, E. A. (1989). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 45-62.
Hanushek, E. A. (1996). School resources and student performance. In G. Burtless (Ed.), Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success (pp. 43-73). Washington, D.C: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 141-164.
Hanushek, E. A. (2002). The long run importance of school quality (Report No. w9071). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hanushek, E. A. (2003). The failure of input‐based schooling policies. The Economic Journal, 113(485), F64-F98.
Hanushek, E. A. (2008). Education production functions. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics online (2nd ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hanushek, E. A., & Luque, J. A. (2003). Efficiency and equity in schools around the world. Economics of Education Review, 22(5), 481-502.
Hedges, L., Laine, R., & Greenwald, R. (1994). Docs money matter? A meta analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student achievement. Educational Researcher, 23(3), 5-14.
Hines, J. R., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). The flypaper effect. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 217-226.
Hsu, H.-C., & Chan, Y.-H. (2014). Reflections on academic capitalism under Taiwan’s “Aim for the Top University Project”. Educational Policy Forum, 17(3), 95-116.
Hyman, J. (2017). Does money matter in the long run? Effects of school spending on educational attainment. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(4), 256-280.
Jackson, C. K., Johnson, R. C., & Persico, C. (2015). The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(1), 157-218.
Jacques, C., & Brorsen, B. W. (2002). Relationship between types of school district expenditures and student performance. Applied Economics Letters, 9(15), 997-1002.
James, E., Alsalam, N., Conaty, J. C., & To, D.-L. (1989). College quality and future earnings: Where should you send your child to college? American Economic Review, 79(2), 247-252.
Ke, Y.-R. (2010). Implementing problems and improving strategies of the University Teaching Excellence Program in Taiwan. E-Journal of Education of Ming-Chuan University, 2, 109-122.
Krueger, A. B. (1999). Experimental estimates of education production functions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 497-532.
Lafortune, J., Rothstein, J., & Schanzenbach, D. W. (2018). School finance reform and the distribution of student achievement. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(2), 1-26.
Levačić, R., & Vignoles, A. (2002). Researching the links between school resources and student outcomes in the UK: A review of issues and evidence. Education Economics, 10(3), 313-331.
Liu, H.-Y. (2016). Resource distribution of higher education in the age of globalization. In H. E. Press (Ed.), Global education (pp. 33-54). Taipei: Higher Education Press.
Lo, W. Y. W. (2014). Taiwan’s higher education system in context. In W. Y. W. Lo (Ed.), University rankings: Implications for higher education in Taiwan (pp. 15-39). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
Mankiw, N. G. (2014). Production and growth. In N. G. Mankiw (Ed.), Principles of macroeconomics (6th ed., pp. 531-554). New Delhi: Cengage Learning.
McMahon, W. W. (2009). Higher learning, greater good: The private and social benefits of higher education. Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Mincer, J. (1975). Education, experience, and the distribution of earnings and employment: An overview. In F. T. Juster (Ed.), Education, income, and human behavior (pp. 71-94). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
MOE. (2005a). The list of schools receieved subsidy. Plan to Encourage Teaching Excellence in Universities. Retrieved from http://www.cttlrc.fcu.edu.tw/edu/program_school_lesA.aspx?yms=94
MOE. (2005b). Plan to develop first-class universities and top-level research centers. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
MOE. (2006a). The manual of 2006 plan to encourage teaching excellence in universities. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
MOE. (2006b). Plan to Encourage Teaching Excellence in Universities. Profile on education. Retrieved from https://english.moe.gov.tw/cp-32-14675-9B62E-1.html
MOE. (2006c). Plan to Develop First-class Universities and Top-level Research Centers. Profile on education. Retrieved from https://english.moe.gov.tw/cp-32-14633-57823-1.html
MOE. (2008). The second phase of plan to encourage teaching excellence in universities. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
MOE. (2009). The manual of 2009 plan to encourage teaching excellence in universities. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
MOE. (2018a). The survey report of the destination of graduates from senior secondary schools of school year 2016. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
MOE. (2018b). Education statistics. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
MOE. (2018c). Financial statement of the ministry of education, FY2017. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
MOE. (2018d). Education in Taiwan. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
MOE. (2018e). Higher Education Sprout Project: Sustained progress and rise of universities in Taiwan. Retrieved from https://english.moe.gov.tw/cp-48-17299-E6CF9-1.html
Mok, K. H. (2015). Higher education transformations for global competitiveness: Policy responses, social consequences and impact on the academic profession in Asia. Higher Education Policy, 28(1), 1-15.
Neely, S. R., & Diebold, J. (2016). Public expenditures and the production of education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(88), online publication. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2441
OECD. (2017). Education at a glance 2017: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Okpala, C. O., Okpala, A. O., & Smith, F. E. (2001). Parental involvement, instructional expenditures, family socioeconomic attributes, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 95(2), 110-115.
Picus, L. O. (2000). Student-level finance data: Wave of the future? The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 74(2), 75-80.
Psacharopoulos, G. (1985). Returns to education: A further international update and implications. Journal of Human Resources, 20(4), 583-604.
Tilak, J. B. (1989). Rates of return to education and income distribution. De Economist, 137(4), 454-465.
Verstegen, D. A., & King, R. A. (1998). The relationship between school spending and student achievement: A review and analysis of 35 years of production function research. Journal of Education Finance, 24(2), 243-262.
Wang, B.-J., Chou, C.-I., & Wang, H.-H. (2011). The evaluation of program for the Promoting Teaching Excellence Universities (Report No. RDEC-RES-099-023). Taipei: Research, Development and Evaluation Commission, Executive Yuan.
Wang, R.-J. (2003). From elitism to mass higher education in Taiwan: The problems faced. Higher Education, 46(3), 261-287.
Webbink, D. (2005). Causal effects in education. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(4), 535-560.
Worthington, A. C., & Dollery, B. E. (1999). Fiscal illusion and the Australian local government grants process: How sticky is the flypaper effect? Public Choice, 99(1-2), 1-13.
Wößmann, L. (2003). Schooling resources, educational institutions and student performance: The international evidence. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(2), 117-170.
Wu, S.-Y. (2010). A study of the University Teaching Excellence Program and teaching quality. (Unpublished master's dissertation), National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yang, C.-C., & Huang, Y.-C. (2012). Promoting teaching excellence of universities in Taiwan: Policy analysis with a special reference to educational equality. International Education Studies, 5(5), 129-140.
Yeh, C.-C. (2009). The evaluation of the University Teaching Excellence Project - An analysis in the perspectives between teachers and students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), National Chi-Nan University, Nantou, Taiwan.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *