|
(加註星號*者為用於後設分析之論文。)
一、中文部分 余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式:SIMPLIS的應用。臺北市:高等教育。 吳清山(2018)。教育4.0。教育研究月刊,292,130-131。 吳璧如(2004)。幼稚園職前教師的教師效能感與任教承諾之關係。教育學刊,23,207-229。 李茂能(2015)。傳統整合分析理論與實務:ESS & Excel。臺北市:五南。 李茂能(2016)。當代整合分析理論與實務。臺北市:五南。 李茂能(2019)。結構方程模式理論與實務。臺北市:五南。 *林三維(2006)。桃園縣國民中學體育教師自我效能與教學效能之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立體育學院,桃園市。 *林欣儒(2018)。數學想想教師自我效能與教學效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立東華大學,花蓮縣。 *林彥輝(2014)。國民小學校長科技領導、學校知識管理與教師教學效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。 林進材(2000)。有效教學:理論與策略。臺北市:五南。 邱兆宏(2004)。壓力與健康:整合分析與模式驗證之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學,高雄市。 *施宏杰(2010)。宜蘭縣國民中小學校長科技領導、教師資訊科技素養與教師教學效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。 *柯麗卿(2009)。獨立研究指導教師教學效能量表之發展及其相關因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。 孫志麟(2001)。教師自我效能與教學行為的關係——實徵取向的分析。國立臺北師範學院學報,14,109-140。 孫志麟(2003)。教師自我效能的概念與測量。教育心理學報,34(2),139-156。 秦夢群、吳勁甫(2011)。國中校長教學領導、學校知識管理與教師教學效能之多層次分析。教育與心理研究,34(2),1-32。 張奕華(2006)。校長科技領導、教師科技素養與教學效能關係之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NSC94-2413-H-004-024-),未出版。 *張奕華、吳怡佳(2008)。校長科技領導與教師教學效能關係之研究。教育研究與發展期刊,4(1),171-193。 張奕華、吳權威(2014)。智慧教育:理念與實踐。臺北市:網奕。 張奕華、許丞芳(2009)。國民中小學校長科技領導指標建構之研究。教育行政與評鑑學刊,7,23-48。 陳木金(1997)。國民小學教師教學效能評鑑量表編製之研究。藝術學報,61,221-253。 *陳芃均(2016)。新竹市國民小學校長科技領導與教師教學效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。 *陳虹君(2011)。國小教師知覺校長科技領導與教師教學自我效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學,臺北市。 陳瑋婷(2011)。自我效能、學習策略與學業成就之關係研究:結合後設分析與結構方程式模型。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,4(2),83-95。doi:10.6764/JTEPD.201112.0083 *陳藝分(2011)。高雄市國民小學教師自我效能感與有效教學行為之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。 *傅齊榮(2009)。臺北市國民小學校長科技領導與教師教學效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。 黃義良、王怡又(2017)。學校行銷組合、學校形象與顧客滿意度之關聯探討:MASEM方法的分析。教育學誌,37,1-61。 黃義良、王怡又(2018)。學校行銷與學校效能關聯之探討:採後設分析結合結構方程模式之驗證。嘉大教育研究學刊,40,63-98。 黃寶園(2004)。結合統合分析與結構方程模式之理論驗證:以壓力調節反應模式之建立與驗證為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。 黃寶園、林世華(2007)。人格特質與社會支持對壓力反應歷程影響之研究:結合統合分析與結構方程式模型二計量方法。教育心理學報,39(2),263-294。doi:10.6251/BEP.20070604 *蔡明政(2014)。校長科技領導、教師資訊素養及教師教學效能關係之研究:以桃園縣國小為例(未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學,桃園縣。 *謝俊煌(2004)。雲林縣國民小學體育教師效能信念及教學效能(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北巿立體育學院,臺北市。 謝進昌、陳敏瑜(2011)。國內教育、心理後設分析研究出版偏誤檢定之實徵分析。測驗學刊,58(2),391-422。 *鍾佳穎(2003)。台北縣國民小學體育教師效能信念與教學行為之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北巿立體育學院,臺北市。 *簡玉琴(2002)。桃園縣國民小學教師自我效能與教學效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院,臺北市。 *顏伶娟(2010)。臺南縣國民小學校長科技領導與教師教學效能之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。南台科技大學,台南市。 *羅彣玢(2009)。花蓮縣國民小學校長科技領導與教師教學效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立花蓮教育大學,花蓮縣。
二、英文部分 Alamolhoda, M., Ayatollahi, S. M. T., & Bagheri, Z. (2017). A comparative study of the impacts of unbalanced sample sizes on the four synthesized methods of meta-analytic structural equation modeling. BMC Research Notes, 10(1), 446. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2768-5 Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 49-82. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. Becker, B. J. (1992). Using results from replicated studies to estimate linear models. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17(4), 341-362. Berk, R. A. (2005). Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectiveness. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 48-62. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J. & Rothstein, H. (2009). Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. Bray-Clark, N., & Bates, R. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs and teacher effectiveness: Implications for professional development. Professional Educator, 26(1), 13-22. Chang, I. (2003). Assessing the dimensions of principals' effective technology leadership: An application of structural equation modelling. Educational Policy Forum, 6(1), 111-141. *Chang, I. H. (2012). The effect of principals' technological leadership on teachers' technological literacy and teaching effectiveness in Taiwanese elementary schools. Educational Technology & Society, 15 (2), 328–340. Chang, I. H., Chin, J. M., & Hsu, C. M. (2008). Teachers' perceptions of the dimensions and implementation of technology leadership of principals in Taiwanese elementary schools. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 229-245. Cheung, M. (2015a). Meta-analysis : A structural equation modeling approach. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Cheung, M. (2015b). metaSEM: an R package for meta-analysis using structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01521 Cheung, M., & Chan, W. (2005). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: a two-stage approach. Psychological Methods, 10(1), 40-64. Cheung, M., & Jak, S. (2016). Analyzing big data in psychology: A split/analyze/meta-analyze approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 738. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00738 Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Deemer, S. A., & Minke, K. M. (1999). An investigation of the factor structure of the teacher efficacy scale. Journal of Educational Research, 93(1) , 3-10. Dexter, S. (2011). School technology leadership: Artifacts in systems of practice. Journal of School Leadership, 21(2), 166-189. Flanagan, L., & Jacobsen, M. (2003). Technology leadership for the twenty‐first century principal. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(2), 124-142. Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569–582. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569 Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 627-643. Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327(7414), 557-560. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60. Hoyle, R. H., & Smith, G. T. (1994). Formulating clinical research hypotheses as structural equation models: A conceptual overview. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 429-440. doi:10.1037/0022-006x.62.3.429 Hsieh, C. C., Yen, H. C. & Kuan, L. Y. (2014). The relationships among principals’ technology leadership, teaching innovations, and students’ academic optimism in elementary schools. Paper presented in International Conference on Educational Technologies & Sustainability, Technology & Education 2014, New Taipei City, Taiwan. ISTE (2009). NETS for administrators. Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/20-14_ISTE_Standards-A_PDF.pdf Jak, S. (2015). Meta-analytic structural equation modelling. Dordrecht, Neth.: Springer. Jak, S., & Cheung, M. (in press). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling with moderating effects on SEM parameters. Psychological Methods. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/ce85j Jensen, B., Wallace, T. L., Steinberg, M. P., Gabriel, R. E., Dietiker, L., Davis, D. S., Kelcey, B., Minor, E. C., Halpin, P., & Rui, N. (2019). Complexity and scale in teaching effectiveness research: Reflections from the MET Study. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(7), 2-21. Ke, Z., Zhang, Q., & Tong, X. (2019). Bayesian meta-analytic SEM: A one-stage approach to modeling between-studies heterogeneity in structural parameters. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26(3), 348-370. Kearsley, G., & Lynch, W. (1992). Educational leadership in the age of technology: The new skills. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25(1), 50-60. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99-128. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4 Mohamadi, F. S., & Asadzadeh, H. (2012). Testing the mediating role of teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs in the relationship between sources of efficacy information and students achievement. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13(3), 427-433. doi: 10.1007/s12564-011-9203-8. Richardson, J. W., & Sterrett, W. L. (2018). District technology leadership then and now: A comparative study of district technology leadership from 2001 to 2014. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(4), 589-616. Richardson, J. W., Bathon, J., Flora, K. L., & Lewis, W. D. (2012). NETS• A scholarship: A review of published literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(2), 131-151. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. Tan, S.C. (2010). Technology leadership: Lessons from empirical research. In Proceedings of ASCILITE - Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference 2010 (pp. 891-895). Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/45492/. Tang, R. W., & Cheung, M. W. L. (2016). Testing IB theories with meta-analytic structural equation modeling: The TSSEM approach and the Univariate-r approach. Review of International Business and Strategy, 26(4), 472-492. Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248. UNESCO. (2015). Incheon declaration: Education 2030-towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for all. Retrieved from http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/education-2030-incheon-framework-for-action-implementation-of-sdg4-2016-en_2.pdf Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1-48. Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1995). Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta‐analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 865-885. Weng, C. H., & Tang, Y. (2014). The relationship between technology leadership strategies and effectiveness of school administration: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 76, 91-107. Wheatley, K. F. (2005). The case for reconceptualizing teacher efficacy research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(7), 747-766. Wong, A. Y., & Daud, K. (2017). Headmaster Technology Leadership in Malaysia Elementary Schools. Journal of Education and Learning, 11(2), 154-164. Wright, S. (1934). The method of path coefficients. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 5(3), 161-215.
|