|
一、中文 108課綱資訊網。十二年國民基本教育。上網日期:2019年12月12日。檢自:http://12basic.edu.tw/12about-3-1.php
王美芬、熊召弟(1995)。國民小學自然科教材教法。台北:心理出版社。
任長松(2003)。《走向新課程》。香港:中文大學出版社。
任長松(2005)。《探究式學習──學生知識的自主建構》。北京:教育科學出版社。
吳百興、張耀云、吳心楷(2010)。科學探究活動中的科學推理。科學教育研究與發展季刊,56期,53-74。
吳裕益(1987)。認知能力與認知型態個別差異現象之探討。教育學刊,7,253-300。
辛瓊瑤(2016)。合作式網路探究課程發展與學習成效評估研究:以圖書館利用教育為例。國立政治大學圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
邱偉雲(2011)。關鍵詞叢與文本意義挖掘的嘗試:以《清季外交史料》為例。載於項潔(主編),數位人文在歷史學研究的應用,159-188。臺北市:國立臺灣大學出版中心。
金觀濤(2011)。數位人文研究的理論基礎。載於項潔(主編),數位人文研究的新視野:基礎與想像,43-61。臺北市:國立臺灣大學出版中心。
祝平次(2018)。數位工具與文史研究。上網日期:2019年12月24日,檢自:https://kam-a-tiam.typepad.com/blog/2018/01/數位工具與文史研究.html
徐宗林(1994)。現代教育思潮。臺北市:五南。
教育部數位人文創新人才培育計畫。計畫介紹。上網日期:2019年12月12日。檢自:http://www.dhcreate.nccu.edu.tw/
教育部資訊及科技教育司。人文社會科學教育發展建議報告書。上網日期:2019年12月15日。檢自:https://reurl.cc/0z8VlA
陳志銘、徐志帆(2019)。基於主動式學習之古漢語斷句系統發展與應用研究。「第十屆數位典藏與數位人文國際研討會」發表之論文,法鼓文理學院。
陳志銘、張志泓(2019)。基於自動圖像標註之圖像檢索工具發展與應用研究。「第十屆數位典藏與數位人文國際研討會」發表之論文,法鼓文理學院。
陳志銘、張鐘(2018)。古籍數位人文研究平台之史料人物關係圖工具發展與應用。「第九屆數位典藏與數位人文國際研討會」發表之論文,法鼓文理學院。
項潔、涂豐恩(2011)。導論—什麼是數位人文。從保存到創造:開啟數位人文研究,9-28。
盧雨芯(2009)。引起學習動機—國中課程導言設計。歷史教育,15期,153-222。
二、英文 Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021017
Blessinger, P., & Carfora, J. (2014). Inquiry-based learning for the arts, humanities, and social sciences: A conceptual and practical resource for educators. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120140000002011
Bradley, J. R., & Conway, R. W. (2003). Managing cyclic inventories. Production and Operations Management, 12(4), 464–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2003.tb00215.x
Bybee, R. W. (1997). The bscs 5e instructional model and 21st century skills. 1-24.
Bybee, R. W., & Landes, N. M. (1988). The Science-Technology-Society (STS) Theme in Elementary School Science. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 8(6), 573–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/027046768800800604
Chiang, T. H. C., Yang, S. J. H., & Hwang, G.-J. (2014). An Augmented Reality-based Mobile Learning System to Improve Students’ Learning Achievements and Motivations in Natural Science Inquiry Activities. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352–365.
Craig, W. A. (2004). Proof of concept: Performance testing in models. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 10(s2), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-9465.2004.00865.x
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston: Heath.
Ehrman, M. E., Leaver, B. L., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System, 31(3), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00045-9
Feldon, D., Franco, J., Chao, J., Peugh, J., & Cathy, M.-F. (2018). Self-efficacy change associated with a cognitive load-based intervention in an undergraduate biology course. Learning and Instruction, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.007
Finn, J. D., & Cox, D. (1992). Participation and withdrawal among fourth-grade pupils. American Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.2307/1162905
Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2012). Student and teacher perspectives on a close reading protocol. Literacy Research and Instruction, 53, 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2013.818175
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iversen, H., & Briggs, D. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82, 300–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206
Gibbs, F. & Owens, T. (2012). Building Better Digital Humanities Tools: Toward broader audiences and user-centered designs. Digital Humanities Quarterly. Retrieved from http://www.trevorowens.org/wp-\ content/uploads/2007/11/building-better-tools-owens-gibbs.pdf
Grandjean, P. (2016). Paracelsus revisited: The dose concept in a complex world. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 119(2), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.12622
Hou, Y. (2019). Gender Difference in Language Learning with Technology. In: Zaphiris P., Ioannou A. (eds) Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Designing Learning Experiences. HCII 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11590. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21814-0_19
Jänicke, S., Franzini, G., Cheema, M. F., & Scheuermann, G. (2015). On close and distant reading in digital humanities: A survey and future challenges. 21.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500
Justice, C., Rice, J., Warry, W., Inglis, S., Miller, S., & Ammon, S. (2007). Inquiry in Higher Education: Reflections and Directions on Course Design and Teaching Methods. Innovative Higher Education, 31, 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-006-9021-9
Karplus & Their (1967). A new look at elementary school science. Rand McNally, Chicago, Ⅱ.
Kirschenbaum, M. (2011). What is digital humanities and what’s it doing in English departments? Debates in the Digital Humanities, 3.
Laursen, S., Hassi, M.-L., Kogan, M., Hunter, A.-B., & Weston, T. (2011). Evaluation of the IBL Mathematics Project: Student and Instructor Outcomes of Inquiry-Based Learning in College Mathematics.
Lim, B. R. (2004). Challenges and issues in designing inquiry on the web. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0007-1013.2004.00419.x
Looi. (1998). Interactive learning environments for promoting inquiry learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 27(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.2190/L4Q4-8QMM-QPJ3-B5LJ
Martini, M. (1986). An analysis of the relationship(s} between and among computer-assisted instruction, learning style perceptual preferences attitudes, and the science achievement of seventh grade students in a suburban New York school district. Unpublished doctoral disseration, St. John's University, Brooklyn.
McCarty, T. L., Borgoiakova, T., Gilmore, P., Lomawaima, K. T., & Romero, M. E. (2005). Indigenous epistemologies and education—Self-determination, anthropology, and human rights. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 36(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.2005.36.1.001
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction-what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347
Moretti, G., Sprugnoli, R., Menini, S., & Tonelli, S. (2016). ALCIDE. Knowledge-Based Systems. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j.knosys.2016.08.003
Murphy, H. J., & Doucette, P. A. (1997). The group embedded figures test: Undergraduate business concentration and analytical skills. Journal of Education for Business, 73(1), 39-44.
Nasreen, A., & Naz, A. (2013). A Study of Factors Effecting Academic Achievement of Prospective Teachers. /paper/A-Study-of-Factors-Effecting-Academic-Achievement-Nasreen-Naz/d449d16ff8fc236226a81d4811a980bbd3f9a21f
OECD.org - OECD. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/school/43023606.pdf
Oliver, R., & Herrington, J. (2001). Teaching and learning online: A beginner’s guide to e-learning and e-teaching in higher education. ECU PUBLICATIONS PRE. Retrieved from https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworks/6832/
Pedaste, M., (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Leijen, Ä., & Sarapuu, T. (2012). Improving students’ inquiry skills through reflection and self-regulation scaffolds. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 9, 81–95.
Pintrich, P., Smith, D., Duncan, T., & Mckeachie, W. (1991). A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor. Michigan, 48109, 1259.
Preston, L., Harvie, K., & Wallace, H. (2015). Inquiry-based learning in teacher education: A primary humanities example. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(12). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n12.6
Ramsay, C. R., Matowe, L., Grilli, R., Grimshaw, J. M., & Thomas, R. E. (2003). Interrupted time series designs in health technology assessment: Lessons from two systematic reviews of behavior change strategies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 19(4), 613–623. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462303000576
Schreibman, S., Siemens, R., & Unsworth, J. (2008). A companion to digital humanities. Retrieved from http://www.digitalhumanities.org/companion/
Schwarz, C., & White, B. (2005). Meta-modeling knowledge: Developing students’ understanding of scientific modeling. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 165–205.
Slotta, J.D., & Linn, M.C. (2009). WISE Science, Web-Based Inquiry in the Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Smart, K. L., & Csapo, N. (2016). Learning by doing: Engaging students through learner-centered activities. Business Communication Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/10805699070700040302
Soewarso. (2000). Cara-cara Penyampaian Pendidikan Sejarah Untuk Membangkitkan Minat Peserta Didik Mempelajari Bangsanya. DEPDIKNAS
Spronken-Smith, R., Bullard, J. O., Ray, W., Roberts, C., & Keiffer, A. (2008). Where might sand dunes be on mars? Engaging students through inquiry-based learning in geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260701731520
Suchman, J. R. (1966). CHAPTER 11—A MODEL FOR THE ANALYSIS OF INQUIRY. Analyses of Concept Learning, 177–187. Academic Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-3127-3.50016-X
Sudjana, N.(2000). Dasar-dasar Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Sinar Baru Algensindo.
Tracy, D., & Hoiem, E. F. M. (2017). Teaching digital humanities tools at a distance: A librarian-instructor partnership integrating scalar into a graduate distance course. At the Helm: Leading Transformation: The Proceedings of the ACRL 2017 Conference March 22–25, 2017. Retrieved from https://experts.illinois.edu/en/publications/teaching-digital-humanities-tools-at-a-distance-a-librarian-instr
Wang, D., Zheng, J., Kurosawa, M., Inaba, Y., & Kato, N. (2009). Changes in activities of daily living (ADL) among elderly Chinese by marital status, living arrangement, and availability of healthcare over a 3-year period. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 14(2), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12199-008-0072-7
White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction - COGNITION INSTRUCT, 16, 3–118. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2
Yager, R., & Akcay, H. (2010). The advantages of an inquiry approach for science instruction in middle grades. School Science and Mathematics, 110, 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2009.00002.x
Zachos, P., Hick, T. L., Doane, W. E. J., & Sargent, C. (2000). Setting theoretical and empirical foundations for assessing scientific inquiry and discovery in educational programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 938–962. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<938::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-S |