本篇論文主要研究賽考利克泰雅語言談語料中的指示詞在功能語法的言談分析下是如何使用銜接功能並且形成語篇。並聚焦在包括qani「這」、qasa「那」以及yasa「那」三個在語料中出現頻率較高之指示詞進行分析討論。
　　功能語法裡指示詞使用指示指稱的方式來形成語篇內部的銜接，但指示詞使用的銜接方式並不只有一種，是可能同時使用多種方式來形成銜接。並且指示詞指稱至指稱目標後，還會進入語意層次，來銜接至指稱物或是核心主題。
　　經研究發現，言談中的qani在功能語法銜接功能中的指示指稱中共有前指、外指以及同時前指與外指三種形成銜接結的方式。Qasa則只有呈現一種前指的形成銜接結的方式。Yasa則是除了指示指稱的前指外，還使用了連接中的總結功能來形成銜接結。在每一個指示詞依照銜接結指稱到指稱目標後，會再進入指稱目標的語意層次，以與指稱物以及語料核心主題之語意範疇有關係的方式再進行銜接鍊的連結，並且形成邏輯通順且語意連貫的語篇。

This thesis studies how demonstratives in Squliq Atayal language help to create a texture in discourse, using the concept of cohesion in s systemic-functional grammar. We focus on analysing and discussing qani “this”, qasa “that” and yasa “that”, since these three demonstratives show the highest frequency of use in our language data.
In functional grammar, demonstratives use deictic reference to form cohesion inside text structure. However, demonstratives use more than one deictic referential function to form cohesion inside a texture. They might also simultaneously use functions other than reference to form cohesive ties. By forming a cohesive tie to the referential target, this cohesive tie will go into semantic level and form a cohesive chain with other cohesive ties refering back to the referent and the core theme or topic of the texture.
In this thesis we found that in discourse data, qani “this” is used for anaphoric and exophoric reference and both two phoric functions form cohesive ties. Qasa “that” only has an anaphoric function. Yasa “that” has an anaphoric function in deictic reference but also has a summarizing function that creates cohesive ties through conjunction. Furthermore, the semantics of referential target will form a cohesive chain refering back to the referent and the core theme or topic of the text structure Therefore, they form a texture that is logically coherent.

第一章　緒論　1
第1節　參考文獻　1
第二章　研究問題及研究方法　14
第1節　研究問題　14
第2節　研究方法　14
第3節　語料說明　16
第4節　發音人介紹　18
第5節　泰雅語（Atayal Language）基本介紹　19
第三章　賽考利克泰雅語長篇語料指示詞頻率與功能　20
第1節　賽考利克泰雅語指示詞介紹　20
第2節　長篇語料中指示詞的頻率　23
第四章　泰雅族語指示詞在語料中的銜接　29
第1節　理論回顧　29
第2節　指示代名詞於語料中形成銜接鍊的方式分析　31
第2-1節　語料一：詢問祖靈之屋所在之處　32
第2-2節　詢問祖靈之屋所在之處語料指示詞分析　37
第2-3節　語料一語篇銜接鍊分析　38
第2-4節　繪製語料一之指示詞形成語篇之銜接鍊圖　41
第2-5節　語料二：Temu Toli先母口傳之部落遷徙過程　43
第2-6節　Temu Toli先母口傳之部落遷徙過程語料指示詞分析　49
第2-7節　語料二語篇銜接鍊分析　51
第2-8節　繪製語料二之指示詞形成語篇之銜接鍊圖　53
第五章　綜合討論　55
第1節　指示詞銜接功能表現的綜合討論　56
第2節　功能語法銜接功能與言談分析的差異　58
第六章　結論　61
第1節　功能語法的銜接功能應用於賽考利克泰雅語指示詞　61
第2節　本論文研究之貢獻　62
第3節　未來可持續研究的方向　63
參考文獻 65
附錄一　新佳陽部落傳統領域地圖　69

Blust, Robert. 1982. The Linguistic Value of the Wallace
Line. Bulletin of the Institute of History and
Philology, Academia Sinica 138: 231-50.
Blust, R., and Trussel S. 2013. The Austronesian Comparative Dictionary: A Work in Progress. Oceanic Linguistics 52.2: 493-523.
Bühler, K. 1982 [1934]. The deictic field of language and deictic words. In R. J. Javella& W. Klein (eds.), Speech, Place and Action, 9-30. New York: Wiley.
Chang, Anna Hsiou-chuan (張秀絹). 2006. A reference grammar of Paiwan. Ph.D. dissertation, Australian National University.
De Busser, Rik. 2009. Towards a grammar of Takivatan Bunun: Selected topics. Melbourne:La Trobe University. (Doctoral dissertation).
De Busser, Rik. 2017. Spatial deixis, textual cohesion, and functional differentiation in Takivatan Bunun. Oceanic Linguistics 56(1). 89–121.
De Busser, Rik. 2018. Referential cohesion in Bunun: A comparison of two genres.In Sonja Riesberg, Asako Shiohara & Atsuko Utsumi (eds.), Perspectives on informationstructure in Austronesian languages, 3–40. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, Function, and Grammaticalization. Typological Studies in Language 42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Diessel, Holger. 2006. Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 17.
Dixon, R. M. W. 2003. Demonstratives: a cross-linguistic typology. Studies in Language 27.1: 61-112.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1971. Santa Cruz lectures on deixis. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar. 2nd ed. London:Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. and R. Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Halliday, M. A. K., and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction tofunctional grammar, 3rd ed. London: Hodder Arnold.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 1996. Demonstratives in narrative discourse: a taxonomy of universal uses. In Barbara Fox (ed.), Studies in anaphora, 205-254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hsu, Lowking Wei-Cheng. 2019. Grammaticalization of Demonstratives in Truku. Ph.D. dissertation, National Tsing Hua University.
Huang, Lillian M. (黃美金). 1995. A study of Mayrinax Syntax. The Crane Publishing, Taipei.
Huang, Lillian M. 2001. Focus system of Mayrinax Atayal: A syntactic, semantic and pragmatic perspective. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Humanities and Social Science 46:51-69.
Huang, Lillian M. 2002. A Study of Deixis in Mayrinax Atayal. The 9th International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics (9ICAL), Canberra: National Australian University, January 8-11, 2002.
Jiang, Hao-wen (江豪文). 2006. Spatial conceptualizations in Kavalan. MA. thesis. Taipei: National Taiwan University.
Jiang, Hao-wen. 2009. Spatial deixis as motion predicates and aspect markers: The case in Kavalan, presented at the 11th International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics (ICAL-11), Aussois, France, Jun 22-26.
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons. John. 1977. Semantics. Vols 1 & 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, James R. 1992. English text: System and structure. Philadelphia: John BenjaminsPublishing.
Martin, James R. 2001. Cohesion and texture. In The handbook of discourse analysis, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton, 35–53. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Pan, Chia-jung (潘家榮). 2012. A grammar of Lha'alua, an Austronesian language of Taiwan. Ph.D. dissertation, James Cook University.
Senft, Gunter (ed.). 1997. Referring to space: Studies in Austronesian and Papuanlanguages. New York: Clarendon Press.
Senft, Gunter. 2004. Deixis and demonstratives in Oceanic languages. Canberra:Pacific Linguistics.
Teng, Stacy F. (鄧芳青). 2007. A Reference Grammar of Puyuma. Ph.D. dissertation, Australian National University.
Wu, Hsiao-Ching (吳曉菁). 2004. Spatial conceptualizations in Tsou and Saisiyat. MA. thesis. Taipei: National Taiwan University.
Yeh, Marie M. (葉美利). 2010. Grammaticalization of the demonstrative ’isa:a’ in Saisiyat, Workshop on Pragmatic Markers in Asian Languages: A pre-conference workshop of The 4th Conference on Language, Discourse and Cognition, 2010.04.30. Taipei: National Taiwan University.
Yeh, Marie M. 2015. Functions of ma’ ’isa:a’ in Saisiyat: A discourse analysis. New Advances in Formosan Linguistics. edited by Elizabeth Zeitoun, Stacy F. Tengand Joy J. Wu, 363-384, Studies on Austronesian Languages, Asia-Pacific Linguistics series A-PL 017 / SAL 003.
吳新生. 2013. 〈從言談分析的觀點探討泰雅語yasa「那」的語言現象〉，發表於「第十四屆全國語言學論文研討會」，2013年5月24-25日。花蓮：國立東華大學。
黃美金、吳新生. 2016.《泰雅語語法概論》。新北巿：原住民族委員會。