帳號:guest(18.191.132.36)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者(中):林彧生
作者(英):Lin, Yu-Sheng
論文名稱(中):台灣上市櫃公司交易量與價格動能交易策略之研究
論文名稱(英):Research on Trading Volume and Price Momentum Strategies in Taiwan Stock Market
指導教授(中):林靖庭
指導教授(英):Lin, Ching-Ting
口試委員:洪偉峰
陳虹伶
口試委員(外文):Hung, Wei-Feng
Chen, Hung-Ling
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立政治大學
系所名稱:金融學系
出版年:2022
畢業學年度:110
語文別:中文
論文頁數:59
中文關鍵詞:動能交易策略交易量週轉率流動性金融危機新冠肺炎
英文關鍵詞:Momentum strategyTrading volumeTurnover rateLiquidityFinancial crisisCOVID-19
Doi Url:http://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202200563
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:79
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • gshot_favorites title msg收藏:0
本研究針對Lee and Swaminathan (2000) 所提出「交易量可預測動能的規模與持續時間」進行驗證,探究交易量與價格動能交易策略在台灣上市櫃公司中的表現。本研究發現,在一年之內,過往具有較高報酬率的公司,其未來報酬率較高;而低交易量公司的報酬率皆高於高交易量公司。將投資期間拉長至五年,則可見到高交易量之股票,其動能逐漸消散,但並無觀察到動能反轉的現象。針對上述,本研究提出「買入低交易量的贏家、並賣出高交易量的輸家」的淨零投資交易策略,將能賺取中期每月1.27%至1.33%、或長期每年4.51%至16.47%的超額報酬。此外,本研究亦觀察股票動能於股市恐慌期間的表現,可發現在全球金融海嘯時期有顯著的動能反轉;然而在新冠肺炎疫情期間,台灣上市櫃公司的動能並未如金融危機期間有明顯的消散現象,推測是因為疫情僅為間接對金融體系造成衝擊,且在疫情爆發初期,台灣國內並未受到疫情嚴重影響,故股市於崩跌後快速反彈。
This study examines the performance of trading volume and price momentum strategies among Taiwan’s listed companies based on the idea that past trading volume predicts the magnitude and persistence of price momentum, which was first documented by Lee and Swaminathan (2000). The result shows that in intermediate-horizon, firms with higher past returns earn higher future returns; in the meantime, firms with lower turnover rate earns higher future returns than firms with higher turnover rate. If the holding period is lengthened to 5 years, it’s found the momentum premiums of high-liquidity firms dissipate gradually, while no significant momentum reversal was found. Based on the above, this study suggests a dollar-neutral portfolio that longs low volume winners and shorts high-volume losers, which generates excess return by 1.27% to 1.33% monthly in intermediate horizon, or 4.51% to 16.47% annually in long horizon. This paper also examined how momentum behaves during recent market declines, where we find momentum reversal during the financial crisis, while no significant momentum dissipation is observed during the panic state caused by COVID-19. A possible explanation is that the pandemic didn’t cause direct damage to the financial system, and Taiwan was not severely affected at the beginning of the global outbreak, so the stock market rebounded quickly following the crash.
第一章 前言 1
第二章 資料與樣本來源 4
第三章 實證結果 6
一、 僅考量動能的交易策略報酬 6
二、 考量交易量與價格動能的中期交易策略報酬 8
三、 中期交易策略的強度測試 10
四、 中期淨零投資交易策略 11
五、 長期交易量與價格動能交易策略與強度測試 12
六、 長期淨零投資交易策略 14
七、 實證結果與交易策略之總結與橫斷面回歸 15
第四章 股市崩跌期間的動能效果 17
第五章 結論 19
參考文獻 21
附錄 44
附錄一 景氣循環依據 44
附錄二 中期交易策略之強度測試:建構期間為3、9及12個月 45
附錄三 價格動能在長期策略下的報酬表現:建構期間為3、9及12個月 54
胡星陽 (1998),流動性對台灣股票報酬率的影響,中國財務學刊, 第五卷第四期,1-19。
陳正佑 (2002),台股動量策略與反向策略投資績效之研究,國立中山大學財務管理研究所未出版博士論文。
行政院主計總處 (2022),中華民國統計資訊網人力資源主要指標-失業率,https://statdb.dgbas.gov.tw/pxweb/dialog/varval.asp?ma=LM0107A1M&ti=%A4H%A4O%B8%EA%B7%BD%A5D%ADn%AB%FC%BC%D0%2D%A4%EB&path=%2E%2E%2FPXfile%2FLaborForce%2F&xu=&yp=&lang=9,擷取日期:2022年5月15日。
Chan, L. K., Jegadeesh, N., & Lakonishok, J. (1996). Momentum strategies. The Journal of Finance, 51(5), 1681-1713.
Chordia, T., & Shivakumar, L. (2002). Momentum, business cycle, and time‐varying expected returns. The Journal of Finance, 57(2), 985-1019.
Cooper, M. J., Gutierrez Jr, R. C., & Hameed, A. (2004). Market states and momentum. The Journal of Finance, 59(3), 1345-1365.
Daniel, K., & Moskowitz, T. J. (2016). Momentum crashes. Journal of Financial Economics, 122(2), 221-247.
Datar, V. T., Naik, N. Y., & Radcliffe, R. (1998). Liquidity and stock returns: An alternative test. Journal of Financial Markets, 1(2), 203-219.
De Bondt, W. F., & Thaler, R. (1985). Does the stock market overreact?. The Journal of Finance, 40(3), 793-805.
Fama, E. F., & MacBeth, J. D. (1973). Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 607-636.
Figelman, I. (2007). Stock return momentum and reversal. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 34(1), 51-67.
Glaser, M., & Weber, M. (2009). Which past returns affect trading volume?. Journal of Financial Markets, 12(1), 1-31.
Griffin, J. M., Ji, X., & Martin, J. S. (2003). Momentum investing and business cycle risk: Evidence from pole to pole. The Journal of Finance, 58(6), 2515-2547.
Grundy, B. D., & Martin, J. S. M. (2001). Understanding the nature of the risks and the source of the rewards to momentum investing. The Review of Financial Studies, 14(1), 29-78.
Hansen, L. P., & Hodrick, R. J. (1980). Forward exchange rates as optimal predictors of future spot rates: An econometric analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 88(5), 829-853.
Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65-91.
Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (2001). Profitability of momentum strategies: An evaluation of alternative explanations. The Journal of Finance, 56(2), 699-720.
Lee, C. M., & Swaminathan, B. (2000). Price momentum and trading volume. The Journal of Finance, 55(5), 2017-2069.
Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1987). Hypothesis testing with efficient method of moments estimation. International Economic Review, 777-787.
Rouwenhorst, K. G. (1998). International momentum strategies. The journal of finance, 53(1), 267-284.
Stivers, C., & Sun, L. (2010). Cross-sectional return dispersion and time variation in value and momentum premiums. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45(4), 987-1014.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2022). Unemployment Rate (Seasonally Adjusted). Retrieved from https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/surveymost?bls on May 15, 2022
(此全文20270621後開放瀏覽)
電子全文
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *