帳號:guest(3.18.106.236)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目
作者(中文):曹哲嘉
論文名稱(中文):跨越邊界之無線通訊應用創新:以本體論為基礎的知識組合分析與個案研究
論文名稱(外文):Cross-Border Innovation on Wireless Communication Applications : A Case Study and Analysis of Ontology-based Knowledge Combination
指導教授(中文):朱詣尹
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:工業工程與工程管理學系
學號:933868
出版年(民國):95
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
論文頁數:92
中文關鍵詞:無線通訊應用跨越邊界創新知識本體論
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:107
  • 評分評分:*****
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏收藏:0
隨著全球化趨勢及資訊科技的快速發展,尤其企業在跨組織與地域之運作中,知識的流動傳遞以及組合與應用,隨著時間、空間及組織型態的結合,趨於多樣性,其本質特性與扮演的角色對企業跨越邊界之創造與本身價值創造而言更成為關鍵因素。
本研究探討我國無線通訊產業在跨越邊界創新活動中,如何運用其跨組織連結及產生之多樣性知識促成新知識之組合已達到技術與營運創新。在無線通訊知識應用快速發展時,隨著知識在內部、外部傳遞,配合著系統化、持續性地加以收集、整合、管理、學習與分享,以及有效之重組運用,藉著知識之縱橫連結以產生創新價值。故本研究以知識本體論為架構,透過產業案例,深入了解個案公司跨越邊界之知識鏈結與知識組合型態,並探討個案公司運用跨越邊界產生之多樣性知識而不斷創新,進而產生價值之過程。
As the globalization and information technology develop quickly, knowledge application and innovation become important for enterprises. Especially, because of the nature of knowledge to more across time, space and organization, the transformation and combination of knowledge across geographical and organizations border can create a variety of combination. Thus; the nature and substance of knowledge is quite a significant factor to create cross-border innovation and value in enterprises.

This research explores the issue of how local wireless communication industry uses the diverse knowledge to prompt cross-border innovation. In wireless communication applications, the firm’s innovation and entrepreneurial opportunities are generated by a systematical collection, integration, learning, and internal or external sharing of various types of knowledge, while continuously creating and utilizing new knowledge during the process. This research focuses on building the ontology of organization knowledge with an analysis and synthesis of knowledge combination process, in-depth interview of the teams performing wireless communication applications, and ontological analysis of cross-border knowledge links and combinations. The resulting ontology framework is to represent the process of the innovative firms in cross-border knowledge combination to promote continuous innovation and value creation.
摘 要 i
誌謝辭 iii
目 錄 iv
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景及動機 1
1.2 研究目的 2
1.3 論文研究架構 2
第二章 文獻探討 5
2.1 知識本體論 5
2.1.1 本體論的定義 5
2.1.2 本體論的發展與本體論管理架構 7
2.1.3 功能式的本體論架構 10
2.1.4 本體論的編輯與整合 13
2.2跨越邊界運作 15
2.2.1 跨越邊界運作之工作特性 15
2.2.2 全球化現象與全球化管理 17
2.2.3 跨組織合作 18
2.3無線產業應用的營運模式與創新機會 19
2.3.1 無線應用產業簡介 19
2.3.2 無線通訊應用產業概況 22
2.3.3 技術創新與創新機會 27
2.3.4 營運模式 29
第三章 研究方法與架構 36
3.1 研究方法與步驟 36
3.2 研究架構 39
3.3 研究對象 44
3.3.1案例公司背景簡介 44
3.3.2 個案訪談類型 48
3.4 研究範圍與限制 50
第四章 案例分析與討論 51
4.1 案例公司之無線通訊應用知識背景 51
4.1.1 Broadcom(博通亞洲) 51
4.1.2力原通訊: 55
4.1.3正文科技 59
4.1.4智邦科技 63
4.1.5明泰科技 66
4.1.6尚亞科技 70
4.1.7技嘉科技 73
4.2 案例分析比較與探討 76
4.2.1知識背景比較分析 76
4.2.2 知識本體論比較分析及整合 79
4.2.3 創新個案過程比較分析 82
第五章 結論與建議 85
5.1 研究結論 85
5.2 應用建議 86
5.3 後續研究建議 86
參考文獻 87
西文文獻 87
中文文獻 91
網站資料 92
附錄一 訪談紀錄 93
西文文獻
1. Aldrich, H., 1979. Organizations and Environments, New Jersey, Englewood Cliffs : Prentice-Hall.
2. Asakawa, K.; Lehrer, M., 2003. Managing Local Knowledge Assets Globally: the Role of Regional Innovation Relays. Journal of World Business Vol. 38, pp.31-42.
3. Beckman, C.; Smith, G., 2005. Shared Networks: Making Wireless Communication Affordable. Wireless Communications, IEEE, Vol. 12, pp.78-85.
4. Beise, M., 2004. Lead Markets: Country-specific Drivers of the Global Diffusion of Innovations. Research Policy Vol. 33, pp. 997-1018.
5. Betz, F., 1998. “Managing Technological Innovation: Competitive Advantage from Change,” John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
6. Bresser, R. K. F., 1988. Matching Collective and Competitive Strategies, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9, pp.375-385.
7. Brown, L., 1981. Innovation Diffusion.
8. Buckly, P. J.; Casson, M., 1988. A Theory of Cooperation in International Business. In Contractor, F. J. & Lorange, P. (eds.), Cooperative Strategies in International Business. D. C.: Heath and Company, Lexington.
9. Chandraskara, B. and Josephson, J.R., 1999. What Are Ontologies and Why Do We Need Them?, IEEE Intelligent Systems, pp.20-26.
10. Chesbrough, H.; R. S. Rosenbloom, 2000. The Role of the Business Model in Capturing Value from Innovation: Evidence From Xerox Corporation's Technology Spinoff Companies, Harvard Business School, Division of Research, pp. 001-002.
11. Christopher, M., 2000. The Agile Supply Chain: Competing in Volatile Markets, Industrial Marketing Management, Volume:29, Issue: 1, January, pp. 37-44.
12. Christensen, C. M., 1997. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Harvard Business School Press.
13. Cristina, A.; Garcia, B.; Kunz, J.; Ekstrom, M.; Kiviniemi, A., 2004. Building a Project Ontology with Extreme Collaboration and Virtual Design and Construction, Advanced Engineering Informatics.
14. Dietzenbacher, E., 2000. Spillovers of Innovation Effects, Journal of Policy Modeling, vol. 22, pp. 27-42.
15. Davenport, T. H.; Short, J. E., 1990. The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign, Sloan Management Review, 11-27.
16. Edgington, T.; Choi, B.; Henson, K.; Raghu, T.S.; d Vinze, A., 2004. Adoptingontology to Facilitate Knowledge Sharing, Communications of the ACM Vol. 47, No. 11
17. Etoh, M.; Yoshimura, T., 2005. Wireless Video Applications in 3G and beyond. Wireless Communications, IEEE, Vol. 12, pp. 66-72.
18. Guarino, N., 1998. Formal Ontology and Information Systems, In Guarino, N. (ed.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Proc. of the 1st International Conference, Trento, Italy, 6-8, IOS Press (amended version), pp.3-15.
19. Hatzichronoglou, T., 1996 Globalization and Competitiveness: Relevant Indicator. OECD.
20. Intel, 2005. Digital City Best Practices. White Paper Digital Cities.
21. Intel, 2004. Business Benefits of Wireless Computing. White Paper Intel Information Technology.
22. John, F., 2005. Wireless Philadelphia Business Plan: Wireless Broadband as the Foundation for a Digital City.
23. KMLab, Inc., 2000. Business Model Warfare.
24. Kitamura, Y.; Mizoguchi, R., 1998. Functional ontology for functional understanding. Twelfth international workshop on qualitative reasoning, AAAI Press, pp.77-87.
25. Kitamura, Y.; Kashiwase, M.; Fuse, M.; Mizoguchi, R., 2004. Development of an ontological framework of functional design knowledge, Advanced Engineering Informatics.
26. Kitamura, Y.; Mizoguchi, R., 2003. Ontology-based Description of Functional Design Knowledge and its Use in a Functional Way Server, Expert System with Applications 24 pp. 153–166.
27. Fox, M.S.; Bilgic, T.; Lin, J.; Gupta, L., Gwizdka, J.; Chionglo, J.F.; Leizero, W., 1996. Knowledge Aided Design. Working Paper, Enterprise Integration Laboratory, 4 Taddle Creek Road, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S1A4.
28. Mahadevan, B., 2000. Business Models for Internet-Based E-Commerce: An Anatomy, California Management Review, vol. 42 (4), pp.55-69.
29. McGuiness, D. L.; Fikes, R.; Rice, J.; Wilder, S., 2000. An Environment for Merging and Testing Large Ontologies. In A. Cohn, F. Giunchiglia, & B. Selman, Eds. KR2000: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, San Francisco, USA, pp. 483–493.
30. Morris, P., 2000. World Wide Work: Globally Distributed Expert Business Services, Emerging Industries, Occasional paper 4, Department of Industry, Science and Resources, Canberra.
31. Neches, R., Fikes, R., Finin, T., Gruber, T., Patil, R., Senator, T. & Swartout, W. R., 1991. Enabling technology for knowledge sharing. AI magazine, Fall, 37-56.
32. Noy, N.F.; Musen, M.A., 2004. Ontology Versioning in an Ontology Management Framework. Intelligent Systems, IEEE, Vol. 19, pp.6-13.
33. OECD, “Osol Manual: The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activity”, OECD, 1997.
34. Oman, C., 1996, Development Centre Policy Brief, The Policy Challenges of Globalization and Regionalization”, OECD , pp.8.
35. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2004. Working Party on the Information Economy - Digital Delivery of Business Services, pp.1-83.
36. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2004. Working Party on the Information Economy - Digital Broadband Content: Mobile Content New Content for New Platforms, pp.1-60.
37. Park, Y.-T., 1999. “Technology Diffusion Policy: A Review and Classification of Policy Practices,” Technology in Society, vol. 21, pp. 275-586.
38. Rappa, M., 2000. “Managing the Digital Enterprise: Business Models on the Web.” from http://digitalenterprise.org/models/models.html.
39. Reimer, U., 1998. Knowledge Integration for Building Organizational Memories. Proceedings of the 11th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Based Systems Workshop, Vol. 2, pp. KM-6.1-KM-6.20.
40. de Rezende, J.L.; de Souza, J.F.; de Souza, J.M.,2005. Peer-to-peer Collaborative Integration of Dynamic Ontologies. Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design Proceedings, IEEE, Vol. 2, pp.1158-1163.
41. Schermerhorn, J. R., Jr., 1975. Determinents of Interorganizational Cooperation, Academy of Management Journal, Vol:18, pp. 846-856.
42. Skinnemoen, H.; Vermesan, A.; Iuoras, A.; Adams, G.; Lobao, X., 2005. VoIP over DVB-RCS with QoS and Bandwidth on Demand. Wireless Communications, IEEE, Vol. 12, pp. 46-53.
43. Shen, W.; Douglas, N.; Bartges, J.A., 2001. Multi-Agent Systems for Concurrent Intelligent Design and Manufacturing.
44. Smith, K. G.; Carroll, S. J.; Ashford, S. J., 1995. Intra- and Interorganizational Cooperation: Toward a Research Agenda, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, pp. 7-23.
45. Staab, S.; Gomez-Perez, A.; Daelemana, W.; Reinberger, M.-L.; Noy, N.F., 2004. Why Evaluate Ontology Technologies? Because It Works!, Intelligent Systems, IEEE. Vol. 19, pp.74-81.
46. Stojanovic, L.; Maedche, A.; Stojanovic, N.; Studer, R., 2003. Ontology Evolution as Reconfiguration-design Problem Solving. Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Capture.
47. Tatiana, S.M.; Ivan. M.M., 2004. Internationalization and the Performance of the Small Firm: A Review of the Empirical Literature between 1996 and 2001. pp.37-63.
48. Thorelli, H. B., 1986. Networks: Between Markets and Hierarchies, Strategic Management Journal, pp. 37-51.
49. Timmers, P., 1998. “Business Models for Electronic Markets.” Journal on Electronic Markets, vol. 8 (2), pp.3-8.
50. Yuan, S.T.; Cheng, C., 2003. Ontology-based Personalized Couple Clustering for Heterogeneous Product Recommendation in Mobile Marketing. Expert Systems with Application, pp.461-476.
51. Yuan, S.T.; Sun, J., 2005. Ontology-Based Structured Cosine Similarity in Document Summarization: With Applications to Mobile Audio-Based Knowledge Management, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part B: Cybernetics, vol. 35, pp.1028-1040.
52. Wong, A.K.Y.; Ray, P., 2005. Ontology Mapping for the Interoperability Problem in Network Management, Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE, Vol. 23, pp.2058-2068.
53. Wang, N. ; Xu, X.,2000. ”A Method to Build Ontology”, 2000. Proceedings, The Fourth International Conference/Exhibition on High Performance Computing in the Asia-Pacific Region,Vol. 2, pp. 672 -673.
54. Weill, P.; Vitale, R. M., 2001. Place to Space, Harvard Business School Press.
55. Xexeo, G.; de Souza, J.M.,.2004. Peer-to-peer Collaborative Editing of Ontologies. Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design Proceedings, IEEE, Vol. 2, pp.186-190.

中文文獻
1. 蔡秋怡,2004,「促進技術創業之智慧資本開發」,國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理研究所碩士論文。
2. 吳東陽,2005,「建立技術創業之組織知識本體論─以積體電路設計公司為例」,國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理研究所碩士論文。
3. 吳誌恭,2002,「供應鏈夥伴間知識網路之協調合作模式─以液晶顯示器產業之採購為例」,國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理研究所碩士論文。
4. 董中凱,2004,「知識擴散與多樣性創新機制之探討─以多功能事務機之技術系統為例」,國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理研究所碩士論文。
5. 簡嘉建,2003,「建構在語意網上之分散式電子化學習物件分享機制─以物料需求規劃之學習為例」,國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理研究所碩士論文。
6. 陳俊源,2001,「以本體論為基礎之企業流程分析方法論」,國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理研究所碩士論文。
7. 工研院產業經濟與資訊服務中心,2004年第一季我國通訊產業產銷調查報 告,新竹:工研院產業經濟與資訊服務中心。
8. 紀昭吟,2004,我國無線通訊產業回顧與 2004 年發展預測,工研院經資中心,新竹縣。
9. 吳思華,2000,策略九說:策略思考的本質,臉譜出版,台北。
10. Allan Afuah, and Christopher L. Tucci, (2001). 電子化策略與營運模式(呂執中)。麥格羅希爾。(原著於2001 年出版)。
11. Gary Hamel, 2000. 啟動革命(李田樹、李芳齡),天下遠見出版。(原著於2000年出版)。
12. 黃居,「語意網、辭網與知識本體:淺談未來網路上的知識運籌,數位典藏國家型科技計畫電子通訊2003年06月,第二卷第六期。
13. 新竹科學園區管理局,無線寬頻網路可行性研究規劃委託服務案工作計畫書,新竹科學園區管理局,民國2005年5月。



網站資料
1. 台灣經濟研究院 http://www.tier.org.tw/07publication/energy/9304/%E8%83%BD%E6%BA%90%E8%88%87%E7%92%B0%E4%BF%9D.htm
2. 博通亞洲股份有限公司 http://zh-tw.broadcom.com/
3. 力原通訊股份有限公司 http://www.terax.com.tw/
4. 正文科技股份有限公司 http://www.gemtek.com.tw/
5. 智邦科技股份有限公司 http://www.accton.com.tw/homepage/
6. 明泰科技股份有限公司 http://www.alphanetworks.com
7. 尚亞科技股份有限公司 http://96936724.boss.com.tw/show_page.asp?income=96936724
8. 技嘉科技股份有限公司 http://chinese.giga-byte.com/
9. 麥肯錫顧問公司 http://www.mckinsey.com/
(此全文限內部瀏覽)
封面
摘要
誌謝辭
目錄
第一章
第二章
第三章
第四章
第五章
參考文獻
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *