|
1) 王榮麟(2004)。物理理論的目標在於保全現象嗎?:杜恩之科學哲學的硏究。國立臺灣大學哲學研究所博士論文,台北市。 2) 林正弘(2007)。〈伽利略為什麼不接受貝拉明的建議──從哲學觀點論伽利略與教會之間的衝突〉。收錄於《伽利略、波柏、科學說明》(二版),頁1-42。台北市:東大圖書。 3) 林正弘(2007)。〈卡爾、波柏與當代科學哲學的蛻變〉。收錄於《伽利略、波柏、科學說明》(二版),頁75-122。台北市:東大圖書。 4) 陳瑞麟(2010)。《科學哲學:理論與歷史》。台北市:群學出版社。 5) Boyd, R. N. (1973). “Realism, Underdetermination, and a Causal Theory of Evidence”. Noûs, 7 (1), 1-12. 6) Brown, H.I. (1979). Perception, Theory and Commitment. University of Chicago Press. 7) Carnap, R. (1936). “Testability and Meaning”. Philosophy of Science, 3 (4), 419-471. 8) Chalmers, A. F. (1999). What Is This Thing Called Science (3/e). Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. 9) Churchland, P. M. & Hooker, C. A. (Eds.) (1985). Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism, with a reply from B. C. van Fraassen. The University of Chicago Press. 10) Duhem, P. (1954). The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory (P. P. Wiener, Trans). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1906) 11) ── (1969). To Save the Phenomena: An Essay on the Idea of Physical Theory from Plato to Galileo (E. Doland & C. Maschler, Trans). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1908) 12) Godfrey-Smith, P. (2003). Theory and Reality: an Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. The University of Chicago Press. 13) Klee, R. (1997). Introduction to the Philosophy of Science: Cutting Nature at Its Seam. Oxford University Press. 14) Kukla, A. (1998). Studies in Scientific Realism. Oxford University Press. 15) ── (2008). “Observation”. In S. Psillos & M. Curd (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science (pp. 396-404). Routledge. 16) Laudan, L. (1981). “A Confutation of Convergent Realism”. Philosophy of Science, 48, 19-49. 17) Losee, J. (2001). A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science (4/e). Oxford University Press. 18) Maxwell, G. (1962). “The Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities”. In H. Feigl & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Scientific Explanation, Space and Time (pp. 3-27). University of Minnesota Press. 19) Popper, K. (2002). Conjectures and Refutations. Routledge. 20) Psillos, S. (1999). “Empiricism and Theoretical Discourse”. In Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth (pp. 3-16). Routledge. 21) ──. “In Defence of Scientific Realism”. In Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth (pp. 70-97). Routledge. 22) ──. “Constructive Empiricism Scrutinized”. In Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth (pp. 185-227). Routledge. 23) Sober, E. (2008). “Empiricism”. In S. Psillos & M. Curd (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science (pp.129-138). Routledge. 24) Suppe, F. (ed.) (1977). The Structure of Scientific Theories (2/e). The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois. 25) Uebel, T. (2008). “Logical Empiricism” In S. Psillos & M. Curd (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science (pp.78-90). Routledge. 26) Van Fraassen, B. C. (1980). The Scientific Image. Oxford University Press. 27) ── (1985). “Empiricism in the Philosophy of Science”. In P. M. Churchland & C. A. Hooker (Eds.), Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism, with a reply from B. C. van Fraassen (pp. 245-308). The University of Chicago Press. 28) --(1989). Laws and Symmetry. Oxford University Press.
|