|
一、 中文文獻 1.遠東學報,TFT-LCD現況分析,2004年9月。 2.呂正華(2004),台灣與南韓產業科技競爭力之比較研究,國家政策季刊。 3.經濟部投資處,平面顯示器產業分析及投資機會,2008年2月。 4.林亭汝,沈永祺,洪仁財(2008),台灣TFT LCD業經營績效之討論:以S-C-P產業組織理論為依據,臺灣企業績效月刊。 5.施錦村,洪儒瑤(2008),公平知覺對顧客忠誠的影響-中介變數的角色,東吳經濟商學學報。 6.李秋緯,徐奕斐(2009),剖析全球面板產業競爭力版圖,拓墣產業研究所。 7.工研院IEK顯示器研究部,2010年第一季我國平面顯示器產業回顧與展望,2010年9月。 8.王振寰(2003),全球化與後進國家:兼論東亞的發展路徑與轉型,台灣社會研究季刊。 9.呂正華(2004),台灣與南韓產業科技政策發展與競爭力之比較,國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士論文。 10.羅筱秋(2004),社會資本、知識流通及企業在地化行為對企業績效影響之實證分析,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 11.李婷立(2005),高績效工作系統與組織公民行為之關係-以信任、組織承諾、責任感為中介變數,國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。 12.王振寰(2005),從科技學習到科技創新的不同途徑:南韓,台灣與中國,台灣社會學論文。 13.李莉雯(2005),探討台日韓TFT-LCD廠商競爭力-以公司層級鑽石理論為基礎,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 14.王彥文,陳志強(2006),韓國產業願景與科技前瞻之整合發展策略,經濟情勢暨評論。 15.林幸亞(2006),韓國財閥經濟體制後期TFT-LCD產業研究,國立台灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。 16.陳傳宗(2006),日台韓產業競爭優勢之比較研究-以液晶顯示面板(TFT-LCD)產業為例,淡江大學日本研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。 17.王綺年(2008),國家角色與產業發展之連結:比較台灣與韓國之薄膜液晶顯示產業,東亞研究。 18.田珮(2009),國家角色、科技產業政策與產業發展:歷經金融海嘯之台韓液晶顯示器產業競爭力分析,國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。 19.翁姿芳(2009),台灣 TFT-LCD 企業經營策略、競爭優勢與績效之比較研究,國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。 20.何岳峯(2010),TFT-LCD產業的創新動態演化:以網絡觀點分析之,國立暨南國際大學經營管理碩士學位學程國企組。 21.拓墣產業研究所,亞洲重要國家產業政策面面觀, 2006年3月。 22.拓墣產業研究所,中國TFT面板產業競爭力剖析, 2007年7月。 23.拓墣產業研究所,剖析全球面板產業競爭力版圖,2009年5月。 24.鐘俊元(2008),TFT-LCD產業回顧與展望,工業技術研究院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心。
二、英文文獻 1.Ahuja G., 2000, Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study, Admin. Sci. Quart, 45, 425–455. 2.Appleyard, M. M., 2003, The influence of knowledge accumulation on buyer-supplier codevelopment projects, J. Product Innovation Management, 20, 356–373. 3.Baron R.& Kenny D., 1986, The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research : Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations, J. Personality Soc. Psych, 51, 1173–1182. 4.Benner M. J.& Tushman M. L., 2003, Exploitation, exploration, and process management : The productivity dilemma revisited, Acad.Management Rev., 28, 238–256. 5.Cassiman B.& Veugelers R., 2006, In search of complementarity in innovation strategy : Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition, Management Sci., 52, 68–52. 6.Cohen P.& Cohen J.& West S. G.& Aiken L. S., 2003, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd ed. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. 7.Cohen W. M.& Klepper S., 1996, Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries : The case of process and product R&D, Rev. Econom. Statist., 78, 232–243. 8.Cohen W. M.& Levinthal D. A., 1989, Innovation and learning : The two faces of R&D, Econom. J., 99, 569–596. 9.Eisenhardt K. M.& Martin J. A., 2000, Dynamic capabilities : What are they?, Strategic Management J., 21, 1105–1121. 10.Internat. J. Oper. Production Management, 22, 349–370. 11.Gibson C. B.& Birkinshaw J., 2004, The antecedents, consequences,and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity, Acad. Management J., 47, 209–226. 12.Godfrey P. C.& Hill C. W. L., 1995, The problem of unobservables in strategic management research, Strategic Management J., 16, 519–533. 13.He Z.-L.& Wong P.-K., 2004, Exploration vs. exploitation : An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis, Organ. Sci., 15, 487–494. 14.Hitt M. A.& Gimeno J.& Hoskisson R. E., 1998, Current and future research methods in strategic management, Organ. Res. Methods, 1, 6–44. 15.Jaccard J.& Wan C. K.& Turrisi R., 1990, The detection and inter-pretation of interaction effects between continuous variables in multiple regression, Multivariate Behavioral Res., 25, 467–478. 16.Katila R.& Ahuja G., 2002, Something old, something new : A longitudinal study of search behavior and product introductions, Acad. Management J., 45, 1183–1194. 17.Kenney M., 1986, Biotechnology : The University-Industrial Complex, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT. 18.Lavie D.& Rosenkopf L., 2006, Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation, Acad. Management J., 49, 797–818. 19.Levin R.& Klevorick A.& Nelson R. R.& Winter S. G., 1987, Appropriating the returns from industrial R&D, Brookings Paper Econom. Activity, 3, 783–820. 20.Levinthal D. A.& March J. G., 1993, The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J., 14, 95–112. 21.Lewin A. Y.& Long C. P.& Carroll T. N., 1999, The coevolution of new organizational forms, Organ. Sci., 10, 535–550. 22.March J. G., 1991, Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, Organ. Sci., 2, 319–340. 23.Mowery D. C., 1983, The relationship between intrafirm and contractual forms of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1900–1940, Explorations Econom. Hist., 20, 351–374. 24.O’Reilly C. A., III & Tushman M. L., 2004, The ambidextrous organization, Harvard Bus. Rev., 83(4), 74–81. 25.Palich L. E.& Cardinal L. B.& Miller C. C., 2000, Curvilinearity in the diversification-performance linkage : An examination of over three decades of research, Strategic Management J., 21, 155–174. 26.Pedhazur E. J., 1997, Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research.Explanation and Prediction, Harcourt Brace, Fort Worth, TX. 27.Probst G.& Raisch S., 2005, Organizational crisis : The logic of failure, Acad. Management Executive, 19, 90–105. 28.Raisch S., 2008, Balanced structures : Designing organizations for profitable growth, Long Range Planning, 41, 483–508. 29.Raisch S.& Birkinshaw J., 2008, Organizational ambidexterity : Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators., J. Management, 34, 375–409. 30.Rothaermel F. T., 2001, Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation, Strategic Management J., 22, 687–699. 31.Rothaermel F. T.& Thursby M., 2007, The nanotech vs. the biotech revolution : Sources of incumbent productivity in research, Res. Policy, 36, 832–849. 32.Sørensen J. B.& Stuart T. E., 2000, Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation, Admin. Sci. Quart., 45, 81–112. 33.Teece D. J., 1986, Profiting from technological innovation : Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy, Res. Policy, 15, 285–305. 34.Thomas L. G., III, 1996, The two faces of competition: Dynamic resourcefulness and the hypercompetitive shift, Organ. Sci., 7, 221–242.
|