|
英文文獻 Aerts, K., & Czarnitzki, D. (2004). Using innovation survey data to evaluate R&D policy: The case of Belgium. (Discussion Paper No. 04-55). Retrieved. April, 01, 2020, from ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research website: https://www.zew.de/en/publications/using-innovation-survey-data-to-evaluate-rd-policy-the-case-of-belgium Aerts, K., & Schmidt, T. (2008). Two for the price of one? Additionality effects of R&D subsidies: A comparison between Flanders and Germany. Research Policy, 37(5), 806-822. Aldrich, H. (1999). Organizations evolving. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Aldrich, H., & Auster, E. R. (1986). Even dwarfs started small: Liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications. Research in Organizational Behavior. 8, 165-198. Ali, A., Kelley, D. J., & Levie, J. (2020). Market-driven entrepreneurship and institutions. Journal of Business Research, 113, 117-128. Antonioli, D., Marzucchi, A., & Montresor, S. (2014). Regional innovation policy and innovative behaviour: looking for additional effects. European Planning Studies, 22(1), 64-83. Arrow, K. J. (1972). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In Charles K. R (Ed.), Readings in Industrial Economics (pp. 219-236). LON: Macmillan. Aulet, W., & Murray, F. (2013). A tale of two entrepreneurs: Understanding differences in the types of entrepreneurship in the economy. Retrieved September, 03, 2020, from Kuaff foundation website: https://www.kauffman.org/entrepreneurship/reports/a-tale-of-two- entrepreneurs-understanding-differences-in-the-types-of-entrepreneurship-in- the-economy/ Autio, E. (2007). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2007 Global Report on High- Growth Entrepreneurship. Retrieved September, 02, 2020, from https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/gem-2007-report-on-high-growth-entrepreneurship Bach, L., & Matt, M. (2005). From Economic Foundations to S&T Policy Tools: a Comparative Analysis of the Dominant Paradigms. In P. Llerena & M. Matt (Eds.), Innovation Policy in a Knowledge-Based Economy: Theory and Practice (pp. 17-45). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Becker, M. C. (2004). Organizational routines: a review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate change, 13(4), 643-678. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D., & Mead, M. (1987). The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 369-386. Biggadike, R. (1989). The risky business of diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 10(6), 523-551. Bollinger, L., Hope, K., & Utterback, J. M. (1983). A review of literature and hypotheses on new technology-based firms. Research Policy, 12(1), 1-14. Bosma, N., Hill, S., Ionescu-Somers, A., Kelley, D., Levie, J., & Tarnawa, A. (2020). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2019/2020 Global Report. Retrieved May, 27, 2020, from https://www.gemconsortium.org/file/open?fileId=50443 Bronzini, R., & Piselli, P. (2016). The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation. Research Policy, 45(2), 442-457. Buffart, M., Croidieu, G., Kim, P. H., & Bowman, R. (2020). Even winners need to learn: How government entrepreneurship programs can support innovative ventures. Research Policy, 104052. Buisseret, T. J., Cameron, H. M., & Georghiou, L. (1995). What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 10(4-6), 587-600. Busom, I., & Fernández-Ribas, A. (2008). The impact of firm participation in R&D programmes on R&D partnerships. Research Policy, 37(2), 240-257. Butchart, R. (1987). A new UK definition of high technology industries. Economic Trends, 400, 82-88. Chrisman, J. J., Bauerschmidt, A., & Hofer, C. W. (1998). The determinants of new venture performance: An extended model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(1), 5-29. Cin, B. C., Kim, Y. J., & Vonortas, N. S. (2017). The impact of public R&D subsidy on small firm productivity: evidence from Korean SMEs. Small Business Economics, 48(2), 345-360. Clarysse, B., Bilsen, V., Steurs, G., & Consult, I. (2006). Behavioural additionality of the R&D subsidies programme of IWT-Flanders (Belgium). Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality, pp. 91-114. Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Mustar, P. (2009). Behavioural additionality of R&D subsidies: A learning perspective. Research Policy, 38(10), 1517-1533. Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1990). New product success factors: a comparison of ‘kills’ versus successes and failures. R&D Management, 20(1), 47-63. Czarnitzki, D., & Delanote, J. (2015). R&D policies for young SMEs: input and output effects. Small Business Economics, 45(3), 465-485. Czarnitzki, D., & Fier, A. (2003). Publicly funded R&D collaborations and patent outcome in Germany. (Discussion Paper No. 03-24). Retrieved April, 02, 2020, from ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research website: https://www.zew.de/en/publications/publicly-funded-rd-collaborations-and-patent-outcome-in-germany ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Czarnitzki, D., & Hottenrott, H. (2011). R&D investment and financing constraints of small and medium-sized firms. Small Business Economics, 36(1), 65-83. Czarnitzki, D., & Hussinger, K. (2004). The link between R&D subsidies, R&D spending and technological performance. (Discussion Paper 04-056). Retrieved April, 02, 2020, from ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research website: https://www.zew.de/en/publications/the-link-between-rd-subsidies-rd-spending-and-technological-performance Czarnitzki, D., & Hussinger, K. (2018). Input and output additionality of R&D subsidies. Applied Economics, 50(12), 1324-1341. Davenport, S., Grimes, C., & Davies, J. (1998). Research collaboration and behavioural additionality: a New Zealand case study. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(1), 55-68. David, P. A., Hall, B. H., & Toole, A. A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 497-529. De Smedt, L. (2015). Additionality of R&D support for Young Innovative Companies. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Universiteit of Hogeschool. Dollinger, M. (2008). Entrepreneurship: Strategies and Resources (4 ed.). Illinois, USA: Marsh. Ebersberger, B. (2005). The impact of public R&D funding. Finland: Technical Research Centre of Finland. (VTT Publications No. 588). Retrieved. April, 26, 2020, from VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland website: https://cris.vtt.fi/en/publications/the-impact-of-public-rampd-funding Ebersberger, B., & Lehtoranta, O. (2005). Pattern of innovative activities among Finnish firm. (VTT Publications No. 588). Retrieved. April, 26, 2020, from VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland website: https://cris.vtt.fi/en/publications/pattern-of-innovative-activities-among-finnish-firms Einiö, E. (2014). R&D subsidies and company performance: Evidence from geographic variation in government funding based on the ERDF population-density rule. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(4), 710-728. Falk, R. (2004). Behavioural Additionality Effects of R&D-Subsidies. Empirical Evidence from Austria. Retrieved. April, 27, 2020, from Austrian Institute of Economic Research website: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.535.9539&rep=rep1&type=pdf Falk, R. (2007). Measuring the effects of public support schemes on firms’ innovation activities: Survey evidence from Austria. Research Policy, 36(5), 665-679. Feldman, M. P., & Kelley, M. R. (2003). Leveraging research and development: Assessing the impact of the US Advanced Technology Program. Small Business Economics, 20(2), 153-165. Feldman, M. P., & Kelley, M. R. (2006). The ex ante assessment of knowledge spillovers: Government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behavior. Research Policy, 35(10), 1509-1521. Fielden, S. L., Davidson, M. J., & Makin, P. J. (2000). Barriers encountered during micro and small business start-up in North-West England. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 7(4), 295-304. Fier, A., Aschhoff, B., & Löhlein, H. (2006). Behavioural additionality of public R&D funding in Germany. Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality, pp. 127-150. Freeman, J., Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1983). The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review, 48(5), 692-710. Garcia, A., & Mohnen, P. (2010). Impact of government support on R&D and innovation. (Working Paper No. 2010-034). Retrieved April, 25, 2020, from https://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:267/wp2010-034.pdf Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696-706. Georghiou, L. (1994). Impact of the framework programme on European industry. (Report EUR 15907). Retrieved April, 26, 2020, from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/f4592590-8dc0-4012-afa6-1482119a7024 Georghiou, L. (1998). Issues in the evaluation of innovation and technology policy. Evaluation, 4(1), 37-51. Georghiou, L. (2002). Impact and additionality of innovation policy. IWT Studies, 40, 57-64. Georghiou, L., & Keenan, M. (2006). Evaluation of national foresight activities: Assessing rationale, process and impact. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(7), 761-777. Georghiou, L., Rigby, J., Cameron, H. (2002). Assessing the socio-economic impacts of the Framework Programme. Retrieved. April, 27, 2020, from https://ec.europa.eu/research/evaluations/pdf/archive/other_reports_studies_and_documents/assessing_the_socio_economic_impacts_of_the_framework_programme_2002.pdf Gök, A. (2010). Evolutionary Approach to Innovation Policy Evaluation: Behavioural Additionality and Organisational Routines. Retrieved, April, 05, 2020, from https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/theses/an-evolutionary-approach-to-innovation-policy-evaluation-behavioural-additionality-and-organisational-routines(0c8bd621-ce09-4945-934b-89f3bec63ae9).html González, X., Jaumandreu, J., & Pazó, C. (2005). Barriers to innovation and subsidy effectiveness. The RAND Journal of Economics, 36(4), 930-950. Hall, B. H., & Maffioli, A. (2008). Evaluating the impact of technology development funds in emerging economies: evidence from Latin America. The European Journal of Development Research, 20(2), 172-198. Halliday, T. C., Powell, M. J., & Granfors, M. W. (1987). Minimalist organizations: Vital events in state bar associations, 1870-1930. American Sociological Review, 52(4), 456-471. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149-164. Hart, M. M., Stevenson, H. H., & Dial, J. (1995). Entrepreneurship: a definition revisited. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 15(3), 54-63. Hewitt-Dundas, N., & Roper, S. (2010). Output additionality of public support for innovation: evidence for Irish manufacturing plants. European Planning Studies, 18(1), 107-122. Hottenrott, H., Lopes-Bento, C., & Veugelers, R. (2017). Direct and cross scheme effects in a research and development subsidy program. Research Policy, 46(6), 1118-1132. Howell, A. (2017). Picking ‘winners' in China: Do subsidies matter for indigenous innovation and firm productivity? China Economic Review, 44, 154-165. Hsu, F.-M., Horng, D.-J., & Hsueh, C.-C. (2009). The effect of government-sponsored R&D programmes on additionality in recipient firms in Taiwan. Technovation, 29(3), 204-217. Hsu, F.-M., & Hsueh, C.-C. (2009). Measuring relative efficiency of government-sponsored R&D projects: A three-stage approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32(2), 178-186. Hud, M., & Hussinger, K. (2015). The impact of R&D subsidies during the crisis. Research Policy, 44(10), 1844-1855. Hussinger, K. (2008). R&D and subsidies at the firm level: An application of parametric and semiparametric two‐step selection models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(6), 729-747. Hyvärinen, J., & Rautiainen, A.-M. (2007). Measuring additionality and systemic impacts of public research and development funding—the case of TEKES, Finland. Research Evaluation, 16(3), 205-215. Kazanjian, R. K., & Drazin, R. (1990). A stage-contingent model of design and growth for technology based new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(3), 137-150. Lenihan, H., Hart, M., & Roper, S. (2007). Industrial policy evaluation: Theoretical foundations and empirical innovations: New wine in new bottles. International Review of Applied Economics, 21(3), 313-319. Licht, G. (2003). The role of additionality in evaluation of public R&D programmes. Paper presented at the 11th TAFTIE Seminar on Additionality. Retrieved. April, 03, 2020, from https://taftie.eu/sites/default/files/xmlsitemap/GeorgeLicht.pdf Lichtenstein, B. M. B., & Brush, C. G. (2001). How do “resource bundles” develop and change in new ventures? A dynamic model and longitudinal exploration. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(3), 37-58. Löhlein, H., & Fier, A. (2005). Behavioural Additionality Effects of Government Financing of Business R&D. (Discussion Paper No. 06-37). Retrieved. April, 02, 2020, from ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research website: https://www.zew.de/en/publications/detecting-behavioural-additionality-an-empirical-study-on-the-impact-of-public-rd-funding-on-firms-cooperative-behaviour-in-germany Lööf, H., & Heshmati, A. (2005). The impact of public funds on private R&D investment: New evidence from a firm level innovation study. (Discussion Paper No. 11862). Retrieved. April, 02, 2020, from ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research website: https://www.zew.de/en/publications/using-innovation-survey-data-to-evaluate-rd-policy-the-case-of-belgium Luukkonen, T. (2000). Additionality of EU framework programmes. Research Policy, 29(6), 711-724. Malik, K., Georghiou, L., & Cameron, H. (2006). Behaviuoral Additionality of the UK SMART and LINK Schemes. Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour Measuring Behavioural Additionality: Measuring Behavioural Additionality, pp. 205-218. Mariani, M., & Mealli, F. (2018). The effects of R&D subsidies to small and medium- sized enterprises. Evidence from a regional program. Italian Economic Journal, 4(2), 249-281. Marino, M., Lhuillery, S., Parrotta, P., & Sala, D. (2016). Additionality or crowding-out? An overall evaluation of public R&D subsidy on private R&D expenditure. Research Policy, 45(9), 1715-1730. Méndez-Morales, E. A., & Muñoz, D. (2019). Input, Output, and Behavioral Additionality of Innovation Subsidies. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 14(4), 158-172. Metcalfe, J. S., & Georghiou, L. (1997). Equilibrium and evolutionary foundations of technology policy. Special Issue on New Rationale and Approaches in Technology and Innovation Policy, 1998(2), 75-100 Meuleman, M., & De Maeseneire, W. (2012). Do R&D subsidies affect SMEs’ access to external financing? Research Policy, 41(3), 580-591. Miller, A., & Camp, B. (1985). Exploring determinants of success in corporate ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 87-105. OECD. (2006). Government R & D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality. Retrieved. June, 06, 2020 from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development website: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/government-r-d-funding-and-company-behaviour_9789264025851-en Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4 ed). New York, NY: Sage. Pollock, T. G., & Rindova, V. P. (2003). Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 631-642. Quintas, P., & Guy, K. (1995). Collaborative, pre-competitive R&D and the firm. Research Policy, 24(3), 325-348. Radicic, D. (2014). The Effectiveness of R&D and Innovation Policy in Promoting Innovation in European SMEs: an Empirical Investigation of Additionality Effects. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Staffordshire University. Schoonhoven, C. B., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Lyman, K. (1990). Speeding products to market: Waiting time to first product introduction in new firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 177-207. Shelton, L. M. (2005). Scale barriers and growth opportunities: A resource-based model of new venture expansion. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 13(4), 333-357. Shepherd, D. A., Douglas, E. J., & Shanley, M. (2000). New venture survival: Ignorance, external shocks, and risk reduction strategies. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5-6), 393-410. Shin, K., Choy, M., Lee, C., & Park, G. (2019). Government R&D subsidy and additionality of biotechnology firms: The case of the South Korean Biotechnology industry. Sustainability, 11(6), 1583. Sieber, S. D. (1973). The integration of fieldwork and survey methods. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1335-1359. Singh, J. V., Tucker, D. J., & House, R. J. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(2), 171-193. Söderblom, A., Samuelsson, M., Wiklund, J., & Sandberg, R. (2015). Inside the black box of outcome additionality: Effects of early-stage government subsidies on resource accumulation and new venture performance. Research Policy, 44(8), 1501-1512. Soltanzadeh, J., Elyasi, M., Ghaderifar, E., Soufi, H. R., & Khoshsirat, M. (2019). Evaluation of the effect of R&D subsidies on Iranian firms’ innovative behavior. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 11(1), 17-48. Steigertahl, L., Mauer, R., & Say, J. (2018). EU Startup Monitor 2018 Report. Retrieved September, 02, 2020, from https://www.eban.org/eu-startup-monitor-2018-report/ Steurs, G., Verbeek, A., Vermeulen, H., & Clarysse, B. (2006). A Look Into the Black Box: What Difference Do IWT R & D Grants Make for Their Clients? Retrieved February, 07, 2020, from https://2rws6i2ak9i045wvup1ldt81-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/IWT-RandD-study.pdf Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In March, J.P. (Ed), Handbook of Organtzatlons (pp. 142-193). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. Storey, D. J., & Tether, B. S. (1998). New technology-based firms in the European Union: an introduction. Research Policy, 26(9), 933-946. Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. C. (1999). Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 315-349. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. Szücs, F. (2020). Do research subsidies crowd out private R&D of large firms? Evidence from European Framework Programmes. Research Policy, 49(3), 103923. Tse, T., & Esposito, M. (2014). Want More Innovation-Driven Entrepreneurship? Go Low-Tech! European Business Review. Retrieved September, 03, 2020, from https://www.europeanbusinessreview.com/want-more-innovation-driven-entrepreneurship-go-low-tech/ Wallsten, S. J. (2000). The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: the case of the Small Business Innovation Research program. The RAND Journal of Economics, 31(1), 82-100. Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic narrative and semi-structured methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Yeoh, P. L., & Roth, K. (1999). An empirical analysis of sustained advantage in the US pharmaceutical industry: Impact of firm resources and capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20(7), 637-653. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. (3 ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414-431.
中文文獻 吳建華、謝發昱、黃俊峰、陳銘凱(2004)。個案研究。載於潘慧玲(編),教育研究的取徑:概念與應用(頁199-236)。臺北:高等教育。 林淑馨(2010)。質性研究:理論與實務。臺北:巨流。 國家發展委員會(2019)。亞洲‧矽谷推動方案進度及成果。上網日期:2020年5月27日,檢自https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/448DE008087A1971/c5f0c959-3ddb-4d4f-8aa1-1bb89956b89a 國家發展委員會(2020)。亞洲‧矽谷計畫進度及成果。上網日期:2020年5月27日,檢自https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=7F37B18CFC68015B 張芬芬(2010)。質性資料分析的五步驟:在抽象階梯上爬升。初等教育學刊, 35,87-120。 陳李綢(2000)。個案研究(再版)。臺北:心理。 陳萬淇(1992)。個案研究法。臺北:華泰。 經濟部中小企業處(2019)具創新能力之新創事業認定原則。上網日期:2020年5月27日,檢自https://www.moeasmea.gov.tw/files/579/51B06AF1-A0EB-4890-A6E4-60B23365A7B0 經濟部中小企業處(2019)小型企業創新研發計畫介紹。上網日期:2020年2月25日,檢自https://www.sbir.org.tw/download_sbir 經濟部技術處(2019)2018科技專案執行年報。上網日期:2020年6月15日,檢自:https://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/doit/publication/Publication.aspx?menu_id=13400&pub_id=5982 經濟部中小企業處(2018)2018中小企業白皮書。上網日期:2021年1月20日,檢自:https://www.moeasmea.gov.tw/list-tw-2345 經濟部中小企業處(2020)2020中小企業白皮書。上網日期:2021年1月21日,檢自:https://www.moeasmea.gov.tw/list-tw-2345 資誠聯合會計師事務所(2019)2019台灣新創圈生態大調查。上網日期:2020年5月27日,檢自:https://www.pwc.tw/zh/publications/topic-report/2019-taiwan-startup-ecosystem-survey.html 潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。臺北:心理。 吳梓川(2017)。新創企業創業團隊關係研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。 Babbie, E. (2016). 社會科學研究方法(林秀雲譯)。臺北:新加坡商聖智學習。 Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (2000). 質性資料分析:文本,影像與聲音(羅世宏、蔡欣怡、薛丹琦譯)。臺北:高等教育。 Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). 質性研究概論(徐宗國譯)。臺北:巨流。
|