帳號:guest(18.222.117.157)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者(中):黃品錞
作者(英):Huang, Pin-Chun
論文名稱(中):網路評論對於購買意願之影響 -以產品類型為調節變數
論文名稱(英):The influence of online reviews on purchase intention -A moderating role of product type
指導教授(中):簡睿哲
指導教授(英):Jian, Rui-Zhe
口試委員:白佩玉
連勇智
口試委員(外文):Bai, Pei-Yu
Lian, Yong-Zhi
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立政治大學
系所名稱:國際經營與貿易學系
出版年:2021
畢業學年度:109
語文別:中文
論文頁數:62
中文關鍵詞:網路評論品質正面網路評論產品類型產品涉入程度觀看評論者專業性
英文關鍵詞:Online ReviewProduct InvolvementProuct Typepostive reviewreview qualityRecipient’s Expertise
Doi Url:http://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202101018
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:2
  • 點閱點閱:55
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • gshot_favorites title msg收藏:0
隨著網路的普及,網路購物變得越來越完善,消費者購物逐漸從線下轉為線上,沒有了線下商品實際的觀看,消費者購物前會在線上搜尋產品相關的資訊,並利用其他消費者的網路評論來當作參考依據,以降低對商品的疑慮,但評論的內容千百種,何種評論才能有效地增加消費者對於商品的購買意願呢?故本研究欲探討網路評論品質、正面網路評論對於消費者購買意願之影響,並因為不同產品類型可能會有不同的研究結果,消費者對於產品的涉入程度、對網路評論的了解程度也可能對結果產生影響,故此研究把產品類型與產品涉入程度以及觀看者專業性當作調節變數,分別探討正面網路評論對購買意願之調節效果。
此研究透過發放問卷來驗證網路評論品質、正面網路評論、產品類型、產品涉入程度、觀看評論者專業性之關係,最後的研究結果也顯示,網路評論品質及正面網路評論能夠有效地增加消費者的購買意願,且產品類型會顯著調節正面網路評論與購買意願之關係。
With the popularization of the network, online shopping is becoming more and more convenient,The purpose of this study is to investigate whether postive reviews,review quality affect consumers' purchase intention.Because different product types may have different research results, the degree of consumer involvement in the product, and Knowledge of online comments may also influence the results. Therefore,product type and product involvement degree and Recipient’s Expertise are regarded as moderating variables in this study.

In this study, questionnaires were issued to verify the relationship between positive review, review quality, Recipient’s Expertise ,product type and product involvement . The results also show that the quality of online reviews and positive online reviews can effectively increase consumers' purchase intention, and the Product type significantly moderates the relationship between positive online reviews and purchase intention.
中文摘要 II
英文摘要 III
表次 VI
圖次 VII
第一章 緒論 01
第一節 研究背景與動機 01
第二節 研究問題與目的 04
第三節 研究範圍與對象 05
第四節 研究方法與流程 06
第二章 文獻探討 07
第一節 網路評論 07
第二節 極端網路評論 08
第三節 網路評論品質 09
第四節 產品涉入程度 10
第五節 產品類型:享樂品、實用品 11
第六節 觀看評論者涉入程度與專業度 12
第七節 信號理論 13
第三章 研究方法 17
第一節 研究架構 17
第二節 研究假設 18
第三節 變數操作型定義與衡量 23
第四節 資料蒐集與分析方法 28
第四章 研究結果與分析 30
第一節 基本資料分析 30
第二節 信度與效度分析 33
第三節 敘述性統計分析 36
第四節 回歸分析 38
第五節 研究假說之驗證 42
第五章 結論與建議 43
第一節 研究結論 43
第二節 研究貢獻與管理意涵 45
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 47
參考文獻 49

中文文獻
財團法人台灣網路資訊中心,2019。2019台灣網路報告 調查亮點與焦點座談會主題
陳冠榮 ,2019。網購市場成長,2019 年電子購物營收估破 2,000 億元大關
翁書婷,2016。Google:69%的台灣消費者傾向在購物前先上網研究
大大學院,2018。消費者相信誰?線上評論如何影響消費者線上/線下購買決策


英文文獻

 Archak, N., Ghose, A., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2011). Deriving the pricing power of product features by mining consumer reviews. Management science, 57(8), 1485-1509.
 Avery, R. J. (1996). Determinants of search for nondurable goods: An empirical assessment of the economics of information theory. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 30(2), 390-420.
 Bao, Y., Bao, Y., & Sheng, S. (2011). Motivating purchase of private brands: Effects of store image, product signatureness, and quality variation. Journal of Business Research, 64(2), 220-226.
 Bei, L. T., Chen, E. Y., & Widdows, R. (2004). Consumers' online information search behavior and the phenomenon of search vs. experience products. Journal of family and economic issues, 25(4), 449-467.
 BliegeBird, R., & Smith, E. (2005). Signaling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital. Current anthropology, 46(2), 221-248.
 Brauer, M., Chambres, P., Niedenthal, P. M., & Chatard-Pannetier, A. (2004). The relationship between expertise and evaluative extremity: The moderating role of experts' task characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 5.
 Carney, M., Edwards, G., & Kim, A. (2020). Doing Well by Doing Wrong: Stakeholders Salience, Wrongdoing, and Reputational Penalties. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2020, No. 1, p. 19962). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
 Chatterjee, P. (2001). Online reviews: do consumers use them?.
 Chen, S. L., Yu, H., Luo, H. M., Wu, Q., Li, C. F., & Steinmetz, A. (2016). Conservation and sustainable use of medicinal plants: problems, progress, and prospects. Chinese medicine, 11(1), 1-10.
 Cheung, C. M. Y., Sia, C. L., & Kuan, K. K. (2012). Is this review believable? A study of factors affecting the credibility of online consumer reviews from an ELM perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(8), 2.
 Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of marketing research, 43(3), 345-354..
 Clemons, E. K., Gao, G. G., & Hitt, L. M. (2006). When online reviews meet hyperdifferentiation: A study of the craft beer industry. Journal of management information systems, 23(2), 149-171.
 Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of management, 37(1), 39-67.
 Crowley, A. E., & Hoyer, W. D. (1994). An integrative framework for understanding two-sided persuasion. Journal of Consumer research, 20(4), 561-574.
 De Maeyer, P. (2012). Impact of online consumer reviews on sales and price strategies: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Product & Brand Management.
 Dellarocas, C. (2003). The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management science, 49(10), 1407-1424.
 Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2007). The costs and benefits of temptation in consumer choice. Working paper.
 Duan, W., Gu, B., & Whinston, A. B. (2008). Do online reviews matter?—An empirical investigation of panel data. Decision support systems, 45(4), 1007-1016.
 Eisend, M. (2006). Source credibility dimensions in marketing communication–A generalized solution. Journal of Empirical Generalisations in Marketing Science, 10(2).
 Eslami, S. P., & Ghasemaghaei, M. (2017). Identifying the conditions under which online reviews translate into product sales: a sentiment analysis approach.
 Eslami, S. P., Ghasemaghaei, M., & Hassanein, K. (2018). Which online reviews do consumers find most helpful? A multi-method investigation. Decision Support Systems, 113, 32-42.
 Filieri, R., & McLeay, F. (2014). E-WOM and accommodation: An analysis of the factors that influence travelers’ adoption of information from online reviews. Journal of travel research, 53(1), 44-57.
 Floyd, K., Freling, R., Alhoqail, S., Cho, H. Y., & Freling, T. (2014). How online product reviews affect retail sales: A meta-analysis. Journal of Retailing, 90(2), 217-232.
 Ford, G. T., Smith, D. B., & Swasy, J. L. (1990). Consumer skepticism of advertising claims: Testing hypotheses from economics of information. Journal of consumer research, 16(4), 433-441.
 Forman, C., Ghose, A., & Wiesenfeld, B. (2008). Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Information systems research, 19(3), 291-313.
 Ghasemaghaei, M., & Hassanein, K. (2015). Online information quality and consumer satisfaction: The moderating roles of contextual factors–A meta-analysis. Information & Management, 52(8), 965-981.
 Ghose, A., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2006, December). Designing ranking systems for consumer reviews: The impact of review subjectivity on product sales and review quality. In Proceedings of the 16th annual workshop on information technology and systems (Vol. 303, No. 10).
 Ghose, A., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 23(10), 1498-1512.
 Griffith, D. A., Krampf, R. F., & Palmer, J. W. (2001). The role of interface in electronic commerce: Consumer involvement with print versus on-line catalogs. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5(4), 135-153.
 Hoffman, E., & Daugherty, T. (2013). Is a picture always worth a thousand words? Attention to structural elements of eWOM for consumer brands within social media. ACR North American Advances.
 Hu, N., Liu, L., & Zhang, J. J. (2008). Do online reviews affect product sales? The role of reviewer characteristics and temporal effects. Information Technology and management, 9(3), 201-214.
 Hussain, S., Ahmed, W., Jafar, R. M. S., Rabnawaz, A., & Jianzhou, Y. (2017). eWOM source credibility, perceived risk and food product customer's information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 96-102.
 Jeong, H. J., & Koo, D. M. (2015). Combined effects of valence and attributes of e-WOM on consumer judgment for message and product: The moderating effect of brand community type. Internet Research.
 Kandampully, J., Zhang, T. C., & Bilgihan, A. (2015). Customer loyalty: a review and future directions with a special focus on the hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.
 Karasek III, R., & Bryant, P. (2012). Signaling theory: Past, present, and future. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 11(1), 91.
 Kesari, B., & Atulkar, S. (2016). Satisfaction of mall shoppers: A study on perceived utilitarian and hedonic shopping values. Journal of Retailing and Consumer services, 31, 22-31.
 Khan, U., & Dhar, R. (2010). Price-framing effects on the purchase of hedonic and utilitarian bundles. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), 1090-1099.
 King, D. B., O'Rourke, N., & DeLongis, A. (2014). Social media recruitment and online data collection: A beginner’s guide and best practices for accessing low-prevalence and hard-to-reach populations. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 55(4), 240.
 Linville, P. W. (1982). The complexity–extremity effect and age-based stereotyping. Journal of personality and social psychology, 42(2), 193.
 Mayzlin, D., Dover, Y., & Chevalier, J. (2014). Promotional reviews: An empirical investigation of online review manipulation. American Economic Review, 104(8), 2421-55.
 Mudambi, S., Schuff, D., & Zifla, E. (2016). What’s “Funny” about Technology Adoption? Humorous Appropriation of Online Review Platforms.
 Negash, S., Ryan, T., & Igbaria, M. (2003). Quality and effectiveness in web-based customer support systems. Information & management, 40(8), 757-768.
 Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of political economy, 78(2), 311-329.
 Nguyen, D. H., de Leeuw, S., & Dullaert, W. E. (2018). Consumer behaviour and order fulfilment in online retailing: a systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(2), 255-276.
 Park, D. H., Lee, J., & Han, I. (2007). The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: The moderating role of involvement. International journal of electronic commerce, 11(4), 125-148.
 Pavlou, P. A., & Dimoka, A. (2006). The nature and role of feedback text comments in online marketplaces: Implications for trust building, price premiums, and seller differentiation. Information Systems Research, 17(4), 392-414.
 Poston, R. S., & Speier, C. (2005). Effective use of knowledge management systems: A process model of content ratings and credibility indicators. MIS quarterly, 221-244.
 Ratchford, B. T., Talukdar, D., & Lee, M. S. (2001). A model of consumer choice of the Internet as an information source. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5(3), 7-21.(CH3 H2)
 Ratchford, B. T., Talukdar, D., & Lee, M. S. (2007). The impact of the Internet on consumers' use of information sources for automobiles: A re-inquiry. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(1), 111-119.
 Roy, R., & Ng, S. (2012). Regulatory focus and preference reversal between hedonic and utilitarian consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(1), 81-88.
 Russell-Bennett, R., McColl-Kennedy, J. R., & Coote, L. V. (2007). Involvement, satisfaction, and brand loyalty in a small business services setting. Journal of business research, 60(12), 1253-1260.
 Sarkar, A. (2011). Impact of utilitarian and hedonic shopping values on individual's perceived benefits and risks in online shopping. International management review, 7(1), 58.
 Schlosser, A. E. (2005). Posting versus lurking: Communicating in a multiple audience context. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2), 260-265.
 Stephen, A. T., & Galak, J. (2012). The effects of traditional and social earned media on sales: A study of a microlending marketplace. Journal of marketing research, 49(5), 624-639.
 Taj, S. A. (2016). Application of signaling theory in management research: Addressing major gaps in theory. European Management Journal, 34(4), 338-348.
 Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Accountability and the perseverance of first impressions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 285-292.
 Todd, P., & Benbasat, I. (1992). The use of information in decision making: An experimental investigation of the impact of computer-based decision aids. Mis Quarterly, 373-393.
 Weisstein, F. L., Song, L., Andersen, P., & Zhu, Y. (2017). Examining impacts of negative reviews and purchase goals on consumer purchase decision. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 39, 201-207.
 Ye, Q., Law, R., & Gu, B. (2009). The impact of online user reviews on hotel room sales. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28(1), 180-182.
 Zaggl, M. A., Hagenmaier, M. A., & Raasch, C. (2019). The choice between uniqueness and conformity in mass customization. R&D Management, 49(2), 204-221.
 Zaichkowsky, J. L. (2010). Consumer involvement. Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing.
 Zhou, S., & Guo, B. (2017). The order effect on online review helpfulness: A social influence perspective. Decision Support Systems, 93, 77-87.
 Zhu, F., & Zhang, X. (2010). Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of marketing, 74(2), 133-148.
(此全文20260722後開放瀏覽)
電子全文
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *