帳號:guest(3.138.137.127)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者(中):柯承佑
作者(英):Ko, Cheng-You
論文名稱(中):探討擬社會關係的形成與效果:Instagram中大型網紅與微網紅之比較
論文名稱(英):Examining the Antecedents and Efficacy of Parasocial Relationships with Macro- and Nano-Influencers on Instagram
指導教授(中):林芝璇
指導教授(英):Lin, Jhih-Syuan
口試委員:陳冠儒
林慧斐
口試委員(外文):Chen, Kuan-Ju
Lin, Hui-Fei
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立政治大學
系所名稱:國際傳播英語碩士學位學程(IMICS)
出版年:2022
畢業學年度:110
語文別:英文
論文頁數:107
中文關鍵詞:Instagram 網紅行銷擬社會關係來源可信度贊助透明自我接露相似度購買行為
英文關鍵詞:Instagram influencer marketingParasocial relationshipSource credibilitySimilaritySponsorship transparencySelf-disclosurePurchase behavior
Doi Url:http://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202200926
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:182
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • gshot_favorites title msg收藏:0
有鑑於Instagram網紅在Z世代中廣受歡迎,以及近年來網紅行銷的蓬勃發展,使用者與網紅間的擬社會關係(Parasocial Relationships, PSR)備受關注。本研究首先探討PSR的形成,並分析此關係對於消費者實際購買行為的中介效果,最後將不同種類的網紅可能產生的調節效果納入考量。為此,本研究共收集451份來自臺灣Z世代的有效問卷,邀請參與者提供一名正在追蹤的Instagram網紅並回報對其可信度、專業知識、吸引力、相似性、真實性、贊助透明度和自我揭露等七大面向之衡量,並根據粉絲人數將參與者提及的網紅,由研究者將其歸類為中大型網紅或微網紅。研究結果顯示,PSR會中介前述七大面向和使用者實際購買行為之間的關係。同時,網紅類型對於使用者的感知真實性及感知自我揭露具有調節效果。當兩者較低時,使用者與微網紅的PSR略強於與中大型網紅的關係;當兩者增加時則反之。研究結果亦顯示,無論網紅類別,感知可信度及感知相似性皆是PSR形成的主要因素。總歸而言,本研究除了分析PSR的形成及其與購買行為之間的關係,更進一步分析PSR是否會因網紅類別而有差異,以驗證及延伸現有文獻,並提供與未來研究方向及網紅行銷相關之建議。
Considering the popularity of Instagram influencers among Gen Zs as well as the growth of influencer marketing, the current research examines how the intimate and one-sided friendship—parasocial relationship (PSR)—is formed, how this relationship relates to purchase behavior of the followers, and the moderating role of influencer types. A total of 451 Taiwanese Gen Zs participated in the online survey. They were instructed to report the perceived trustworthiness, expertise, attractiveness, similarity, authenticity, sponsorship transparency, self-disclosure, PSR, and purchase behavior with regard to the influencer that they selected. The influencers were then categorized into macro-influencers and nano-influencers based on their number of followers. The findings suggest that PSR mediated the positive relationships between the antecedents and purchase behavior. Influencer types moderated the relationships between two antecedents (i.e., perceived authenticity and self-disclosure) and PSR. When perceived authenticity and self-disclosure were at a low (high) level, participants’ PSRs with nano-influencers were stronger (weaker) than that with macro-influencers. In addition, perceived trustworthiness and perceived similarity were the dominant predictors of PSRs for both macro-influencers and nano-influencers. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings and directions for future research are discussed.
ABSTRACT i
CHAPTER 1 Introduction 1
CHAPTER 2 Literature Review 5
2.1. Influencers 5
2.2. Parasocial Relationship (PSR) and Purchase Behavior (PB) 6
2.3. Trustworthiness, Expertise and Attractiveness 8
2.4. Similarity 11
2.5. Authenticity 12
2.6. Sponsorship Transparency 14
2.7. Self-disclosure 16
CHAPTER 3 Methodology 24
3.1. Study Design 24
3.2. Data Collection 24
3.3. Study Procedure 26
3.4. Measurements 26
3.4.1. Self-report on Instagram influencers 26
3.4.2. Trustworthiness, Expertise, Attractiveness, and Similarity 27
3.4.3. Authenticity 28
3.4.4. Sponsorship Transparency 29
3.4.5. Self-disclosure 30
3.4.6. Parasocial Relationship 31
3.4.3. Purchase Behavior 32
CHAPTER 4 Results 34
4.1. Descriptive Statistics 34
4.2. Reliability Analysis 36
4.3. Hypotheses Testing 40
4.4. Moderation Analysis 47
CHAPTER 5 Discussion and Conclusion 56
5.1. The Mediating Effect of PSR between the Antecedents and Purchase Behavior 56
5.1.1. Source Credibility Model 57
5.1.2. Similarity 59
5.1.3. Authenticity 60
5.1.4. Sponsorship Transparency 61
5.1.5. Self-disclosure 62
5.2. The Moderating Effects of Influencer Types 63
5.2.1. Relationships between the Antecedents and PSR 63
5.2.2. Nature of PSR Formation 66
5.3. Research Contributions 68
5.3.1. Theoretical Implications 68
5.3.2. Practical Implications 70
5.4. Limitations and Future Research 71
References 74
Appendix 99
Survey Questionnaire 99
Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Audrezet, A., de Kerviler, G., & Guidry Moulard, J. (2020). Authenticity under threat: When Social Media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. Journal of Business Research, 117, 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008
Aw, E. C. X., & Chuah, S. H. W. (2021). “Stop the unattainable ideal for an ordinary me!” fostering parasocial relationships with social media influencers: The role of self-discrepancy. Journal of Business Research, 132, 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.025
Aw, E. C. X., & Labrecque, L. I. (2020). Celebrity endorsement in social media contexts: Understanding the role of parasocial interactions and the need to belong. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37(7), 895–908. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-10-2019-3474
Bazarova, N. N., & Choi, Y. H. (2014). Self-disclosure in social media: Extending the functional approach to disclosure motivations and characteristics on social network sites. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 635-657. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12106
Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Flavián, M., & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2021). Understanding influencer marketing: The role of congruence between influencers, products and consumers. Journal of Business Research, 132, 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.067
Belanche, D., Flavián, M., & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2020). Followers’ reactions to influencers’ instagram posts. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 24(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/sjme-11-2019-0100
Boerman, S. C. (2020). The effects of the standardized Instagram disclosure for micro- and meso-influencers. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.015
Breves, P., Amrehn, J., Heidenreich, A., Liebers, N., & Schramm, H. (2021). Blind trust? The importance and interplay of parasocial relationships and advertising disclosures in explaining influencers’ persuasive effects on their followers. International Journal of Advertising, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1881237
Campbell, C., & Evans, N. J. (2018). The role of a companion banner and sponsorship transparency in recognizing and evaluating article-style native advertising. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 43, 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2018.02.002
Campbell, C., & Farrell, J. R. (2020). More than meets the eye: The functional components underlying influencer marketing. Business Horizons, 63(4), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.03.003
Carter, D. (2016). Hustle and Brand: The sociotechnical shaping of Influence. Social Media + Society, 2(3), 205630511666630. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116666305
Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2017). Antecedents of consumer intention to follow and recommend an Instagram account. Online Information Review, 41(7), 1046–1063. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-09-2016-0253
Chan, K. K., & Misra, S. (1990). Characteristics of the opinion leader: A new dimension. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1990.10673192
Chan, R. Y. (2001). Determinants of Chinese consumers' green purchase behavior. Psychology and Marketing, 18(4), 389–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.1013
Choi, S. M., & Rifon, N. J. (2012). It is a match: The impact of congruence between celebrity image and consumer ideal self on endorsement effectiveness. Psychology & Marketing, 29(9), 639–650. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20550
Chu, S. C., & Choi, S. M. (2011). Electronic word-of-mouth in social networking sites: A cross-cultural study of the United States and China. Journal of Global Marketing, 24(3), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2011.592461
Chung, S., & Cho, H. (2017). Fostering parasocial relationships with celebrities on social media: Implications for celebrity endorsement. Psychology & Marketing, 34(4), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21001
Cohen, E. L., & Tyler, W. J. (2016). Examining perceived distance and personal authenticity as mediators of the effects of ghost-tweeting on parasocial interaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(5), 342–346. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0657
Cohen, J., Weimann-Saks, D., & Mazor-Tregerman, M. (2017). Does character similarity increase identification and persuasion? Media Psychology, 21(3), 506–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1302344
Cornwell, T. B. (2019). Less “sponsorship as advertising” and more sponsorship-linked marketing as authentic engagement. Journal of Advertising, 48(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2019.1588809
De Cicco, R., Iacobucci, S., & Pagliaro, S. (2020). The effect of influencer–product fit on advertising recognition and the role of an enhanced disclosure in increasing sponsorship transparency. International Journal of Advertising, 40(5), 733–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2020.1801198
De Jans, S., Van de Sompel, D., De Veirman, M., & Hudders, L. (2020). #Sponsored! How the recognition of sponsoring on Instagram posts affects adolescents’ brand evaluations through Source Evaluations. Computers in Human Behavior, 109, 106342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106342
De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035
Demir, M., Şimşek, Ö. F., & Procsal, A. D. (2012). I am so happy ‘cause my best friend makes me feel unique: Friendship, personal sense of uniqueness and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(4), 1201–1224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9376-9
Dibble, J. L., Hartmann, T., & Rosaen, S. F. (2015). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12063
Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285-290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033731
Duck, S., & Barnes, M. K. (1992). Disagreeing about agreement: Reconciling differences about similarity. Communication Monographs, 59(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376262
Duffy, B. (2015). Amateur, autonomous, and collaborative: Myths of aspiring female cultural producers in web 2.0. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 32(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2014.997832
Ermec Sertoglu, A., Catlı, O., & Korkmaz, S. (2013). Examining the Effect of Endorser Credibility on the Consumers’ Buying Intentions: An Empirical Study in Turkey. International Review of Management and Marketing, 4(1), 66–77.
Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2017). Connecting with celebrities: How consumers appropriate celebrity meanings for a sense of belonging. Journal of Advertising, 46(2), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1274925
Evans, N. J., Phua, J., Lim, J., & Jun, H. (2017). Disclosing Instagram influencer advertising: The effects of disclosure language on advertising recognition, attitudes, and behavioral intent. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 17(2), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2017.1366885
Farivar, S., Wang, F., & Yuan, Y. (2021). Opinion leadership vs. para-social relationship: Key factors in influencer marketing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102371
Federal Trade Commission. (2017a). CSGO Lotto Owners Settle FTC’s First-Ever Complaint Against Individual Social Media Influencers. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2017/09/csgo-lotto-owners-settle-ftcs-first-ever-complaint-against-individual-social-media-influencers
Federal Trade Commission. (2017b). FTC Staff Reminds Influencers and Brands to Clearly Disclose Relationship. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2017/04/ftc-staff-reminds-influencers-brands-clearly-disclose-relationship
Federal Trade Commission. (2019). Disclosures 101 for Social Media Influencers. https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/disclosures-101-social-media-influencers
Fehr, B. (2008). Friendship formation. In S. Sprecher, A. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 29–54). Psychology Press.
Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1086/209380
Fu, S., Xu, Y., & Yan, Q. (2017). Enhancing the parasocial interaction relationship between consumers through similarity effects in the context of social commerce. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 27(2), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254x.2017.1384045
Geyser, W. (2021, December 29). The state of Influencer Marketing 2022: Benchmark Report. Influencer Marketing Hub. Retrieved July 5, 2022, from https://influencermarketinghub.com/influencer-marketing-benchmark-report/
Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4(3), 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0403_04
Greene, K., Derlega, V. J., & Mathews, A. (2006). Self-disclosure in personal relationships. The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships, 409-427.
GWI. (2022a). Social media use by generation. Globalwebindex. https://www.gwi.com/reports/social-media-across-generations
GWI. (2022b). The biggest social media trends for 2022. Globalwebindex. https://www.gwi.com/reports/social
Hartmann, T. (2008). Parasocial interactions and paracommunication with new media characters. In Mediated Interpersonal Communication (1st ed., pp. 177–199). essay, Routledge.
Hoffner, C., & Buchanan, M. (2005). Young adults' wishful identification with television characters: The role of perceived similarity and character attributes. Media Psychology, 7(4), 325–351. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0704_2
Hoffner, C., & Cantor, J. (1991). Perceiving and responding to mass media characters. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes (pp. 63–101). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Horton, D., & Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635. https://doi.org/10.1086/266350
Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. psychological studies of opinion change. Yale University Press.
Hudders, L., De Jans, S., & De Veirman, M. (2021). The commercialization of social media stars: A literature review and conceptual framework on the strategic use of social media influencers. International Journal of Advertising, 40(3), 327–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2020.1836925
Hwang, K., & Zhang, Q. (2018). Influence of parasocial relationship between digital celebrities and their followers on followers’ purchase and electronic word-of-mouth intentions, and persuasion knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.029
Igartua, J. J., & Guerrero-Martín, I. (2022). Personal migrant stories as persuasive devices: Effects of audience–character similarity and narrative voice. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 10(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.8237
Interactive Advertising Bureau. (2018). Inside influence: Why publishers are increasingly turning to influencer marketing and what that means for marketers. Interactive Advertising Bureau. https://www.iab.com/wp-content/uploads /2018/01/IAB_Influencer_Marketing_ for_Publishers_2018-01-25.pdf.
Janssen, L., Schouten, A. P., & Croes, E. A. (2021). Influencer advertising on Instagram: Product-influencer fit and number of followers affect advertising outcomes and influencer evaluations via credibility and identification. International Journal of Advertising, 24(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1994205
Jarzyna, C. L. (2020). Parasocial interaction, the covid-19 quarantine, and digital Age Media. Human Arenas, 2020. 1–17.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-020-00156-0
Jin, S. V., Muqaddam, A., & Ryu, E. (2019). Instafamous and social media influencer marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 37(5), 567–579. https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-09-2018-0375
Jin, S. A. A., & Phua, J. (2014). Following celebrities’ tweets about brands: The impact of Twitter-based electronic word-of-mouth on consumers’ source credibility perception, buying intention, and social identification with celebrities. Journal of Advertising, 43(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.827606
Joseph, W. B. (1982). The credibility of physically attractive communicators: A review. Journal of Advertising, 11(3), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1982.10672807
Kamins, M. A. (1990). An investigation into the “match-up” hypothesis in celebrity advertising: When Beauty may be only skin deep. Journal of Advertising, 19(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1990.10673175
Kareklas, I., Muehling, D. D., & Weber, T. J. (2015). Reexamining health messages in the digital age: A fresh look at source credibility effects. Journal of Advertising, 44(2), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2015.1018461
Kay, S., Mulcahy, R., & Parkinson, J. (2020). When less is more: The impact of macro and micro social media influencers’ disclosure. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(3-4), 248–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2020.1718740
Ki, C. W., Cuevas, L. M., Chong, S. M., & Lim, H. (2020). Influencer marketing: Social media influencers as human brands attaching to followers and yielding positive marketing results by fulfilling needs. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102133
Kim, D. Y., & Kim, H. Y. (2021). Trust me, Trust Me not: A nuanced view of influencer marketing on social media. Journal of Business Research, 134, 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.024
Kim, S. J., Maslowska, E., & Tamaddoni, A. (2019). The paradox of (dis)trust in sponsorship disclosure: The characteristics and effects of sponsored online consumer reviews. Decision Support Systems, 116, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2018.10.014
KOL Radar. (2021, August 31). 2021 百大影響力網紅數據洞察報告書x數位時代. KOL Radar. Retrieved September 21, 2021, from https://www.kolradar.com/reports/2021-top100-kol
Kurtin, K. S., O'Brien, N. F., Roy, D., & Dam, L. (2019). Parasocial Relationships with Musicians. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 8(2), 30–50.
Le, K., & Aydin, G. (2022). Impact of the pandemic on social media influencer marketing in fashion: A qualitative study. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/qmr-11-2021-0133
Lee, J. A., & Eastin, M. S. (2021). Perceived authenticity of social media influencers: Scale development and validation. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 15(4), 822–841. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrim-12-2020-0253
Lee, S. S., & Johnson, B. K. (2022). Are they being authentic? the effects of self-disclosure and message sidedness on sponsored post effectiveness. International Journal of Advertising, 41(1), 30–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1986257
Leite, F. P., & Baptista, P. D. P. (2022). The effects of social media influencers’ self-disclosure on behavioral intentions: The role of source credibility, parasocial relationships, and brand trust. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 30(3), 295-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2021.1935275
Li, Y., & Peng, Y. (2021). Influencer marketing: Purchase intention and its antecedents. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 39(7), 960–978. https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-04-2021-0104
Lim, X. J., Radzol, A. R. M., Cheah, J. H., & Wong, M. W. (2017). The impact of social media influencers on purchase intention and the mediation effect of customer attitude. Asian Journal of Business Research, 7(2), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.170035
Lin, H. C., Bruning, P. F., & Swarna, H. (2018). Using online opinion leaders to promote the hedonic and utilitarian value of products and services. Business horizons, 61(3), 431-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.01.010
Lou, C. (2022). Social media influencers and followers: Theorization of a trans-parasocial relation and explication of its implications for influencer advertising. Journal of Advertising, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1880345
Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501
Luo, M., & Hancock, J. T. (2020). Self-disclosure and social media: Motivations, mechanisms and psychological well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 110–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.019
Luoma-aho, V., Pirttimäki, T., Maity, D., Munnukka, J., & Reinikainen, H. (2019). Primed authenticity: How priming impacts authenticity perception of social media influencers. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(4), 352–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2019.1617716
Lyu, J., & Lehto Brewster, M. (2020). Exploring the parasocial impact of nano, micro and macro influencers. Pivoting for the Pandemic. https://doi.org/10.31274/itaa.12254
Mander, J., Buckle C., & Morris, T. (2020). Most important social media platforms for B2B and B2C marketers worldwide as of January 2020. GlobalWebIndex. https://www.gwi.com/reports/generation-z
Mander, J. & Gilsenan K. (2019). Influencer marketing—Exploring the current influencer marketing landscape and its future potential. GlobalWebIndex. https://www.gwi.com/reports/influencer-marketing
Masuda, H., Han, S. H., & Lee, J. (2022). Impacts of influencer attributes on purchase intentions in social media influencer marketing: Mediating roles of characterizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121246
McCracken, G. (1989). Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 310. https://doi.org/10.1086/209217
Munnukka, J., Maity, D., Reinikainen, H., & Luoma-aho, V. (2019). “Thanks for watching”. The effectiveness of YouTube vlogendorsements. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.014
Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers' perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191
Olenski, S. (2018, April 2). Brands, branding and celebrities. Forbes. Retrieved January 2, 2022, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveolenski/2018/04/02/brands-branding-and-celebrities/?sh=5a6d8abe4db9
Park, N., Jin, B., & Jin, S. A. A. (2011). Effects of self-disclosure on relational intimacy in Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1974–1983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.05.004
Peres, R., & Silva, M. (2021). The role of micro-influencers in the consumer decision-making process in the hospitality field. European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, 11(1), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.2478/ejthr-2021-0010
Perse, E. M., & Rubin, R. B. (1989). Attribution in social and Parasocial relationships. Communication Research, 16(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365089016001003
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135–146. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2488919
Pöyry, E., Pelkonen, M., Naumanen, E., & Laaksonen, S.-M. (2019). A call for authenticity: Audience responses to social media influencer endorsements in strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(4), 336–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2019.1609965
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: Collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Reinikainen, H., Munnukka, J., Maity, D., & Luoma-aho, V. (2020). ‘You really are a great big sister’ – parasocial relationships, credibility, and the moderating role of audience comments in Influencer marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(3-4), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2019.1708781
Rindfleisch, A., Malter, A. J., Ganesan, S., & Moorman, C. (2008). Cross-sectional versus longitudinal survey research: Concepts, findings, and Guidelines. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.3.261
Rubin, R. B., & McHugh, M. P. (1987). Development of parasocial interaction relationships. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 31(3), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838158709386664
Ruppel, E. K. (2015). The affordance Utilization Model: Communication Technology use as relationships develop. Marriage & Family Review, 51(8), 669–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2015.1061628
Santora, J. (2022). Key influencer marketing statistics you need to know for 2022. Influencer Marketing Hub. https://influencermarketinghub.com/influencer-marketing-statistics/
Schouten, A. P., Janssen, L., & Verspaget, M. (2020). Celebrity vs. influencer endorsements in advertising: The role of identification, credibility, and product-endorser fit. International Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 258–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1634898
Sepp, M., Liljander, V., & Gummerus, J. (2011). Private bloggers' motivations to produce content – A gratifications theory perspective. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(13-14), 1479–1503. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2011.624532
Shan, Y., Chen, K. J., & Lin, J. S. (2020). When social media influencers endorse brands: The effects of self-influencer congruence, parasocial identification, and perceived endorser motive. International Journal of Advertising, 39(5), 590–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1678322
Sherman, E., Mathur, A., & Smith, R. B. (1997). Store environment and consumer purchase behavior: Mediating role of consumer emotions. Psychology and Marketing, 14(4), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6793(199707)14:4<361::aid-mar4>3.0.co;2-7
Shimp, T. A., & Kavas, A. (1984). The theory of reasoned action applied to coupon usage. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(3), 795. https://doi.org/10.1086/209015
Shoenberger, H., & Kim, E. (2022). Explaining purchase intent via expressed reasons to follow an influencer, perceived homophily, and perceived authenticity. International Journal of Advertising, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2022.2075636
Shoenberger, H., Kim, E. A., & Johnson, E. K. (2019). #beingreal about Instagram ad models: The effects of perceived authenticity. Journal of Advertising Research, 60(2), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.2501/jar-2019-035
Simon, H. A. (1972). Theories of bounded rationality. Decision and organization, 1(1), 161-176.
Sokolova, K., & Kefi, H. (2020). Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? how credibility and Parasocial Interaction Influence Purchase Intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011
Stacey, H. (2019, May 17). Introducing Generation Z: The newest team member [Image attached] [Post]. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/introducing-generation-z-newest-team-member-helen-stacey/
Stafford, M. R., Stafford, T. F., & Day, E. (2002). A contingency approach: The effects of spokesperson type and service type on service advertising perceptions. Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673664
Taiwan Network Information Center. (2020, December 11). Taiwan Internet Report 2020. Taiwan Network Information Center. Retrieved January 3, 2022, from https://report.twnic.tw/2020/en/TrendAnalysis_internetUsage.html
Temperley, J. & Tangen, D. (2006). The Pinocchio factor in consumer attitudes towards celebrity endorsement: celebrity endorsement, the Reebok brand, and an examination of a recent campaign. Journal of Innovative Marketing, 2(3), 97-106.
Tian, Q., & Hoffner, C. A. (2010). Parasocial interaction with liked, neutral, and disliked characters on a popular TV series. Mass Communication and Society, 13(3), 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430903296051
Till, B. D., & Busler, M. (1998). Matching products with endorsers: Attractiveness Versus Expertise. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15(6), 576–586. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363769810241445
Torres, P., Augusto, M., & Matos, M. (2019). Antecedents and outcomes of digital influencer endorsement: An exploratory study. Psychology & Marketing, 36(12), 1267–1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21274
Tukachinsky, R., Walter, N., & Saucier, C. J. (2020). Antecedents and effects of parasocial relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 70(6), 868–894. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa034
Turner, J. R. (1993). Interpersonal and psychological predictors of parasocial interaction with different television performers. Communication Quarterly, 41(4), 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379309369904
Uzunoğlu, E., & Kip, S. M. (2014). Brand communication through digital influencers: Leveraging blogger engagement. International journal of information management, 34(5), 592-602. https://DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.04.007
van Driel, L., & Dumitrica, D. (2021). Selling brands while staying “authentic”: The Professionalization of Instagram influencers. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 27(1), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520902136
Van Lange, P. A., Rusbult, C. E., Semin-Goossens, A., Görts, C. A., & Stalpers, M. (1999). Being better than others but otherwise perfectly normal: Perceptions of uniqueness and similarity in close relationships. Personal Relationships, 6(3), 269-289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00192.x
Voorveld, H. A. M. (2019). Brand communication in social media: A research agenda. Journal of Advertising, 48(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2019.1588808
Wojdynski, B. W., Evans, N. J., & Hoy, M. G. (2018). Measuring sponsorship transparency in the age of native advertising. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 52(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12144
Woodroof, P. J., Howie, K. M., Syrdal, H. A., & VanMeter, R. (2020). What’s done in the dark will be brought to the light: Effects of influencer transparency on product efficacy and purchase intentions. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29(5), 675–688. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-05-2019-2362
Yuan, C. L., Kim, J., & Kim, S. J. (2016). Parasocial relationship effects on customer equity in the social media context. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3795–3803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.071
Yuan, S., & Lou, C. (2020). How social media influencers foster relationships with followers: The roles of source credibility and fairness in parasocial relationship and product interest. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2020.1769514
(此全文20250717後開放瀏覽)
電子全文
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *