|
Right of property is one of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the constitution, to protect the property interests. But the main goal is to protect the social and economic life foundation of individuals from being infringed by the state or a third one. If it is necessary for the state to restrict based on the public interest, It must also comply with constitutional requirements such as the principle of legal reservations and the principle of proportionality. And because the protection of the right of property in the modern constitution, is not only in the state of property, but also values of free development of the personality and dignity of the individual. Therefore, no matter how important the state's public welfare purpose is, it can’t completely deprive individuals of their right of property, so that they cannot gain a foothold in social life. There are still limits to this in democratic politics, let alone periods of authoritarianism. Authoritarian rulers in the White Terror were based on consolidating their political interests, established a system of confiscation of all property through a special criminal law, bringing private property of offenders involved in specific crimes into the state treasury, serious violation of their property rights, even the property rights and survival rights of the family members of the confiscated are challenged. This article focuses on the system of the confiscation of all property, and found that from investigation to seizure, even trial and enforcement of cases, there were corresponding laws and supporting measures, used to systematically loot the property of political victims. Through the cases in which confiscations have actually been executed in this article, find out that politics has nowhere to intervene in the process of confiscation of property, and made the system more injustice
|