本研究旨在比較分析台灣公部門組織與非營利組織辦理之有機農業推廣工作情況,以助於未來推廣資源之整合。整體而言,雖然公部門組織過去在推廣上一直扮演主導的地位,但重視程度和投入資源仍很有限。而民間非營利組織向來雖扮演政策配合角色,近年來推廣成效卻相當引人注目。在教育訓練方面,以往大都偏重於生產者訓練,以公部門組織為重心,近年來民間非營利組織則以志工服務和企業經營方式,將訓練對象擴及於消費者,為有機教育訓練注入創新經營理念。而在傳播方面,目前各農改場和大多非營利組織都有製作有機農法相關的手冊書籍,但缺乏統整協調。在有機農業的推廣工作上,民間具有公益形象的非營利組織在未來擔任推動者的角色份量應加重。公部門組織和非營利組織應在功能上明確分工,例如行政院農委會主要擔任政策擬定和經費補助、推廣成效考評的工作;各農業試驗改良場所主要專職於有機農法的試驗改良工作;農學院校除了擔任研究工作外,在資訊傳播的媒體製作和網路教育上可擔重任,負擔大眾有機農業教育的工作;而其他非營利性組織則可依生產者和消費者之關懷重點擔任主要推廣任務。
This study is to compare the extension performance of non-profit organizations and government al organizations with regard to Taiwan's organic agriculture development. As a whole, the development of organic agriculture in the past decade is primarily directed by governmental agency, though it pays little attention and invests quite limited resources to this industry. In contrast, the NPO's deserve great appreciation for its exceeding contribution in promoting organic agriculture and continuously providing information to the general public. In terms of education and training, instead of traditional training tasks charged by governmental agencies, NPO's involvement with rationale of volunteer and business management efficiency gradually brings about innovative experiences and knowledge to the learners. In essence, there are a bunch of brochures related to organizations and fulfill effective task division. For instance, the Council of Agriculture (COA) should only take charge of policy-making, financial support and project evaluation; while those research institutes are ought to concentrate merely on experiment, technology research and web-based education. Whereas the NPO's shall take advantage of its volunteers and efficiency to pay more attention to general education to both producers and consumers with respect to organic agriculture.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。