若您是本文的作者，可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。
並列摘要
This article discussed the manufacturer accountability from the point of view of consumer protection in two major parts. One is the concept of product defects and the other is the case study on Criminal Law. The manufacturer accountability, especially the safety issue, should be concerned over product design, production process and the following use. However, instead of intentional design, the negligence was often the major cause of the product accidents related with manufacturer, and thus the illegal behavior of individuals or enterprisers against the Criminal Law should be studied for its causal relationship and punished with clearly documented regulations.
延伸閱讀
- 郭麗珍（2017）。商品責任與商品製造人責任規範之整合。法令月刊，68(6)，30-55。https://doi.org/10.6509/TLM.2017.6806.02
- 陳韋誠（2021）。論商品製造人責任。消費者報導雜誌，(480)，12-14。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20180921002-202104-202104060017-202104060017-12-14
- 朱柏松（1994）。消費者保護法商品製造人責任規定之適用與解釋（上）。臺大法學論叢，24(1)，353-409。https://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.1994.24.01.12
- 林彥廷（2016）。A Study of Extended Producer Responsibility System〔碩士論文，國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-1303201714253887
- 張可興（2006）。Evaluating the Effect of Product Variety on the Efficiency of Manufacturing Systems〔碩士論文，國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2006.01531