透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.137.178.133
  • 期刊

Acute Effects of d-Amphetamine on the Differential Reinforcement of Low-Rate (DRL)

並列摘要


Amphetamine and it analogs have been shown to affect operant behavior maintained on the differential reinforcement of a low-rate (DRL) schedule. The aim of the present study was to investigate what specific component of the DRL response is affected by d-amphetamine. The acute effects of d-amphetamine on a DRL task were compared with those of the selective dopamine D1 and D2 receptor antagonists, SCH23390 and raclopride, respectively. Pentylenetetrazole and ketamine were also used as two reference drugs for comparison with d-amphetamine as a psychostimulant. Rats were trained to press a lever for water reinforcement on a DRL 10-s schedule. Acute treatment of d-amphetamine (0, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg) significantly increased the response rate and decreased the reinforcement in a dose-related fashion. It also caused a horizontal leftward shift in the inter-response time (IRT) distribution at the doses tested. Such a shifting effect was confirmed by a significant decrease in the peak time, while the mean peak rate and burse response remained unaffected. In contrast, both SCH23390 (0, 0.05, and 0.10 mg/kg) and raclopride (0, 0.2, and 0.4 mg/kg) significantly decreased the total, non- reinforced, and burst responses. The de-burst IRT distributions were flattened out as shown by the dose-related decreases in the mean peak rate for both dopamine antagonists, but no dramatic shift in peak time was detected. Interestingly, neither pentylenetetrazole (0, 5, and 10 mg/kg) nor ketamine (0, 1, and 10 mg/kg) disrupted the DRL behavioral performance. It is then conceivable that d-amphetamine at the doses tested affects the temporal regulation of DRL behavior. The effectiveness of d-amphetamine is derived from its drug action as a psychostimulant. Taken together, these data suggest that different behavioral components of DRL task are differentially sensitive to pharmacological manipulation.

參考文獻


Balcells-Olivero, M.,Richards, J.B.,Seiden, L.S.(1997).Sensitization to amphetamine on the differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate 72-s schedule.Psychopharmacology.133,207-213.
Bizot, J.-C.(1998).Effects of various drugs including organophosphorus compounds (OPC) and therapeutic compounds against OPC on DRL responding.Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav..59,1069-1080.
Britton, K.T.,Koob, G.F.(1989).Effects of corticotropin releasing factor, desipramine and haloperidol on a DRL schedule of reinforcement.Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav..32,967-970.
Buhusi, C.V.,Meck, W.H.(2002).Differential effects of methamphetamine and haloperidol on the control of an internal clock.Behav. Neurosci..116,291-297.
Canon, J.G.,Lippa, A.S.(1977).Use of DRL in differentiating anxiolytic and neuroleptic properties of CNS drugs.Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav..6,591-593.

延伸閱讀