透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.250.169
  • 期刊

不同降雨入滲情境對蓮華池集水區水文模擬之影響

The Effect of Different Rainfall-Infiltration Circumstances on Hydrological Simulation in the Lien-Hwa-Chi Watersheds

摘要


本研究分別採用(1)降雨完全入滲與(2)降雨部份入滲兩種不同入滲模擬情境之土壤水分演算模式(Soil Moisture Routing Model, SMR),以南投蓮華池4號與5號集水區爲例,進行1993-1994年逐日流量估算與集水區內土壤體積含水量空間分布模擬,並對照量水堰實測流量與現地土壤含水量調查資料,以檢核兩種降雨入滲情境之模擬效度。數據指出,兩種降雨入滲情境之Nash-Sutcliffe流量模擬效度指數(R^2)差異不大(降雨完全入滲之模擬效度爲0.87與0.80;採降雨部份入滲情境之模擬效度爲0.87與0.78),但採降雨完全入滲情境之土壤體積含水量空間分布推估結果較符合現地實測值。而土壤水分演算模式無論採用何種入滲情境進行模擬,於濕季與土壤水分消退時段均具較高之流量預測能力;但乾季時其演算過程則可能受集水區地表複雜度與土壤層含水量急劇變化影響,而產生較差之模擬效果。綜合上述研究成果,可發現降雨完全入滲之設定較適用於蓮華池4號與5號集水區。

並列摘要


Two different circumstances, total rainfall and partial rainfall infiltrating into soil layers, are applied in this research. We apply the Soil Moisture Routing Model (SMR) for hydrologic simulation in Lien-Hwa-Chi Watershed No. 4 and No. 5 during the period between 1993 and 1994, and compare the quantity of streamflow and spatial distribution of soil water content counted from both different circumstances. Results show that different circumstances produce almost equal accuracy of streamflow simulation. The values of Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency are 0.87 and 0.80 for the total rainfall infiltrating into soil circumstance for Watershed No. 4 and No. 5 respectively; while the values are 0.87 and 0.78 based on the partial rainfall infiltrating into soil circumstance. Comparing the different seasons, these two circumstances produce better efficiencies of streamflow simulation during wet season. Moreover, comparing the distribution of soil moisture content on watersheds, the total rainfall infiltrating into soil circumstance is more reasonable. Overall, the total rainfall infiltrating into soil mechanism is more suitable for the hydrologic simulation in the Lien-Hwa-Chi watersheds, including quantity of runoff generation and soil moisture content.

參考文獻


(Soil and Water Laboratory (2003) SMDR - the Soil Moisture Distribution and Routing Model - Documentation Version 2.0, Ithaca: Biological and Environment Engineering Department, Cornell University).
(U.S. Army CERL (1991) GRASS 4.1 User's Manual, Champaign: Construction Engineering Research Laboratory).
(USACE (1998) HEC-1 Flood Hydrograph Package User's Manual, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, California, USA.).
(USACE (2000) Hydrologic Modeling System HEC-HMS Technical Reference Manual, Hydrologic Engineering Center, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, California, USA).
Abbott, M. B.,Bathurst, J. C.,Cunge, J. A.,O'' Connel, P. E.,Rasmussen, J.(1986).An introduction to the European Hydrological System-Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, "SHE", 1: history and philosophy of a physically based, distributed modeling system.Journal of Hydrology.87(1-2),45-59.

被引用紀錄


詹于婷(2011)。稻草蓆敷蓋下之礫石地土壤水分入滲研究〔博士論文,國立屏東科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST.2011.00232
何碩倫(2015)。納入土壤含水因子於土石流有效累積雨量預警訂定與警戒解除時間之研究〔碩士論文,逢甲大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6341/fcu.M0205369

延伸閱讀