理情教育團體對大學生理性思考、社會焦慮與自我接納效果之研究

The Effects of a Rational-Emotive Group on Rational Thinking, Social Anxiety and Self-Acceptance of College Students

吳麗娟(Li-Chuan Wu)

《教育心理學報》 20期 (1987/05) Pp. 183-203

https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.19870601.9

摘要

研究主要目的在於探討以「理性情緒治療」為基礎所發展出來的理情教育團體，對大學生理性思考、社會焦慮及自我接納的團體輔導效果“本研究分為二部分，第一部分以國立臺灣師範大學一般科系二、三、四年級22名學生為對象，隨機分派至實驗組與控制組各11名：第二部分以國立臺灣師範大學本科系（教育心理系）三年級26名學生為對象，隨機分派至實驗組與控制組各13名。實驗組接受九週（或八週）的理情教育團體輔導，每週一次，每次二小時；控制組僅參加前後測。本研究以「理性行為量表」、「社會生活問卷」及自編之「理情教育團體同饋表」為評量工具，所得資料分別以單因子共變數分析和t考驗進行處理。研究結果顯示，理情教育團體除了對本科系學生社會情境焦慮的減低有正向顯著效果外，其他在理性思考、社會焦慮及自我接納上，實驗組與控制組的差異均未達到統計上之顯著性，然而由平均分數來看，實驗組均有正向改變的趨勢，自口非理性思考分數減低，社會焦慮分數降低，自我接納分數增加。研究者並根據本研究結果，提出若干建議供未來研究之參考。

並列摘要

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of rational-emotive education (REE, a method of preventive RET) with college students on rational thinking, social anxiety and self-acceptance.
This study included two groups of subjects. The first one included twenty-six volunteer students from the Department of Educational Psychology of National Taiwan Normal University. The second one was formed by twenty-two volunteer students from eight departments of the same university. Both groups were further divided into Experimental & Control Subgroups. The two experimental groups received two hours of REE training each week for nine weeks, while the two control groups received no treatment. All subjects were given pretest and posttest measures which included the Rational Behavior Scale (RBS), a measure of irrational ideas, and the Social Life Scale, a measure of social anxiety (the social avoidance and distress & fear of negative evaluation) and self-acceptance. The data obtained from this study were analyzed by oneway ANCOVA and a t-test.
Results indicated that the difference between the pre & post test of the score on the social avoidance and distress of the Experimental Group formed by Educational Psychology students was statistically signficant. But all other measures showed no significant difference between the experimental and control groups. However the two experimental groups did show some gain on their scores.
The implications in further research of this topic were discussed at the final.