多元智能與問題解決整合型教學模式對國小學生數學學習表現之影響

The Effects of Integrated Teaching Model of Multiple Intelligences and Problem-Solving on Mathematics Performance of Elementary School Studemts

林奕宏(Yi-Hong Lin) ； 張景媛(Ching-Yuan Chang)

《教育心理學報》 33卷1期 (2001/10) Pp. 1-29

https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20010225

摘要

本研究探討多元智能與問題解決型教學模式對國小學生數學學習表現的影響。研究者融合多元智能論及問題解決教學建構整合教學模型，以一班六年級學生為實驗教學對象；另一班控制組行傳統教學。結果發現：實驗教學一學期後，在成就測驗上，實驗組學生顯著較高；在解題歷程上，實驗組學生的自我表達、形成解題目標、水平遷移、解題正確數等方面表現較佳；實驗組中、高成就運用圖示、表徵的表現優於控制組中、高成就生。在態度量表上，實驗組學生的整體數學態度、學習信心及探究動機著較高；在態度訪談上，實驗組學生具有：學生為學習中心、易將教學與生活聯結、數學基模活化較廣、重視同儕互動等四項特點。

關鍵字

多元智能 ； 問題解決 ； 數學教學

並列摘要

The purpose of this study was to explore the psychological transformation process of the primary schoolboarding students from the 921-earthquake disaster area and psychological reestablishment group.Thesubjects were six primary school boarding students.The subjects'responses of their emotion,cognition,andbehavior to the earthquake were collected by the researcher then analyzed and interpreted the subjects'psychological transformation process according to group data and correlated studies.The researchers got the conclusions that there were five stages of the subjects'psychologicaltransformation process:(1)Stage Ⅰ (psychological suffering):The subjects had negative emotions(such asfear),disordered behaviors,and suspected the meaning of life.(2)Stage Ⅱ (premature):The life of disaster letthe subjects understand their parents'diligence and learned how to be independent.(3)Stage Ⅲ (felling ofloss):The subjects appreciated the care of their relatives,but they still had the felling of loss.(4)Stage Ⅳ(passing the sadness):After participating the reconstructing group,the subjects could adjust themselvesgradually and had crisis consciousness of disaster.(5)Stage Ⅴ (psychological reestablishment):The subjectscould understand the positive meaning of earthquake from the self-help and interpersonal help,and they couldthink the events of reconstruction.Based on the findings,the researchers submitted some suggestions for the reference of practical workers.

並列關鍵字

Multiple Intelligences ； Problem-Solving ； Mathematics Teaching

參考文獻

Adams, D. M.,Hamm, M. E.(1990).Cooperative learning: critical thinking and collaboration across the curriculum.Illinois:Charles C Thomas. Publisher.

Artzt, A.(1983).The comparative effects of the student-team method of instruction and the traditional teacher-centered method of instruction upon student achievement, attitude, and social interaction in high school mathematics courses.New York University.

Blythe, T.,Gardner, H.(1990).A school for all intelligences.Educational Leadership.47(7),33-36.

Bottge, B. A.(1999).Effects of contextualized math instruction on problem solving of average and below-average.Journal of Special Education.33(2),81-93.

Brush, T. A.(1997).The Effects of group composition on achievement and time on task for students completing ILS activities in cooperative pairs.Journal of Research on Computing in Education.30(1),2-17.