透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.217.106.238
  • 期刊

廚藝創造力發展歷程量表之發展研究

The Construction of Inventory for Culinary Creativity Process

摘要


本研究旨在發展與編製適用於評量廚藝創造力發展歷程的工具,量表的發展與編製乃基於廚藝創造力理論與發展為一連續構念的歷程。「廚藝創造力發展歷程量表」包括「準備」、「醞釀與轉換」、「具象化」、「發現想法」、「討論與妥協」、「豁朗」、「想法評估」七個構念,全量表共40題,做答方式採用Likert六點量尺。本研究所使用的資料分析方法包括次數分配、描述統計、項目分析、Cronbach α 內部一致性分析、探索性因素分析、驗證性因素分析、皮爾森積差相關、t考驗,與單因子變異數分析。量表的內度一致性係數介於.77至.91之間,並以因素分析來驗證建構效度。整體而言,本量表具有良好的信度與效度。最後,以1,000位立意樣本為研究對象,進行大量施測,回收有效樣本為669份。本研究發現創造力發展歷程因性別、教育程度而有顯著差異;而不同廚藝專長之廚師或學生,其在廚藝創造力發展各歷程上表現也不一。本研究根據研究結果,提出有關量表應用與未來研究之具體建議。

並列摘要


The purpose of this research was to develop an inventory for measuring culinary creativity development. This inventory is based on the theory of culinary creativity and the concept that ”development” is a continuing process. The inventory includes 7 major aspects: preparation, incubation and transformation, realization, discovering new ideas, discussion and compromise, illumination, and idea evaluation. There are 40 criteria included in the inventory using a 6-point Likert scale. One thousand participants were invited to participate in the research, and 669 valid responses were returned. Frequency distribution, descriptive statistics, item analysis, Cronbach α, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, Pearson's correlation analysis, and ANOVA are techniques employed to analyze the data collected. Internal consistency ranged from .77 to .91, and construct validity is tested using factor analysis. Results supported the reliability and validity of the inventory. It was found that gender and educational background were related to the development of culinary creativity development. In addition, chefs and students demonstrate different developmental processes because they possess different culinary experience. Application of the inventory and future research directions are discussed.

參考文獻


行政院新聞局(民94):美國「蓋洛普機構」所作之五國民調顯示,台灣及其人民普獲國際人士好感。中華民國(台灣)行政院新聞局網站︰ http://info.gio.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=27445&Node=3875。檢索日期︰民98.02.28
Wallas, G. (1926). The arts of thought. New York: Harcour Brace and World
Amabile, T. M.(1983).The social psychology of creativity.New York:Spring-Verlag.
Amabile, T. M.(1996).Creativity in context.Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
Amabile, T. M.,Conti, R.,Coon, H.,Lazenby, J.,Herron, M.(1996).Assessing the work environment for creativity.Academy of Management Journal.39(5),1154-1184.

被引用紀錄


高淑品(2010)。國際廚藝技能競賽選手創造思考歷程之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺北科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6841/NTUT.2010.00333
姚湘玲(2011)。混成式創意教學之個案研究─以高職美容科為例〔碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST.2011.00103
李怡君(2006)。影響廚藝創造力的個人與環境因素之研究〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0712200716135905
林琳(2006)。創意廚藝產品評量工具之發展研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0712200716124887
陳立真(2007)。創意廚藝教學實施成效之研究〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-2910200810574286

延伸閱讀