本研究之目的在調查彰化縣八卦山區長青自行車道上登山健行遊客與登山自行車使用者之遊憩衝突,並根據Jacob和Schreyer(1980)所提之目標干擾理論來探討兩類遊憩使用者之衝突行爲。調查以內容平行的兩份問卷分別對兩類遊憩使用者進行施測,共計訪問297位登山健行遊客及109位登山自行車使用者。研究結果顯示登山健行者感受到登山自行車數量太多所造成之擁擠感,及自行車速度快所造成壓迫感最爲嚴重;而登山自行車使用者則認爲登山健行遊客太多造成擁擠感最爲嚴重。理論測試結果顯示目標干擾理論較能解釋外團體衝突而較無法解釋內團體衝突。活動型態及資源特色無法成爲進憩衝突之預測因子,經驗模式及生活型態容忍度可以顯著地預測登山健行道客之內、外團體衝突;僅有生活型態容忍度可預測登山自行車使用者之外團體衝突,而在登山自行車內團體衝突模型中則無任何顯著之預測因子。
The purposes of this study were to investigate recreation conflicts between hikers and mountain bikers on the Chang-Ching Bike Trail, Chang Hua County, and test the Goal Interference Theory (Jacob & Schreyer, 1980). The study surveyed 297 hikers and 109 mountain bikers. The study results indicated ”too many mountain bikers on the trail” and ”fast biking causes the stress” were the two most serious problems for the hikers; on the other hand, crowding, caused by the hikers, was the most serious problem for the mountain bikers. The theory testing results indicated ”activity style” and ”resource specificity” can not be predictors of perceived conflict. However, ”mode of experience” and ”lifestyle tolerance” could significantly predict both in-group and out-group conflicts for the hikers. Only mode of experience was significant in the bikers' out-group conflict model. Also there was no significant variable in the bikers' in-group conflict model.