Relation between Technology and Science: A Perspective of Patent and Paper Production

本研究以電子與電機產業為例，從其發明專利產量與科學論文產量的觀點探討科學與技術之關係。先前的研究多數透過對技術專利與科學文獻之間的引用來探討關於科學與技術的連結，但這樣的角度僅能呈現其相互影響的部分面向。因此本研究選擇以電子與電機產業專利表現極佳的20家世界知名公司為例，從同一個公司之專利產量與科學文獻產量的角度切入，探討科學與技術兩者之間的關連，並分別從其被引用狀況，分析企業產出專利與發表科學論文後所造成的影響程度。此外本研究也分析各公司的技術週期時間(Technology Cycle Time, TCT)，探討TCT與Patent-Paper Ratio之間的關連，並改良即時影響指數(Modified Current Impact Index, Modified CII)的計算方法使其同時適用於專利與論文，進而比較各公司的專利與論文之即時影響指數。其中發明專利與科學論文分別檢索自USPTO與WoS資料庫，於1989年至2008年間之資料。研究結果顯示，雖然近20年來電子與電機領域的科學論文成長幅度比技術專利大，但該領域中技術專利表現最優秀的20個公司的科學論文發表狀況與產生的影響力卻與其專利數量與影響力之間關連不顯著。本結果對於電子與電機領域之公司在技術與科學之間的連結關係提供一項新的實務證據。

關鍵字

科學與技術；專利；論文；電子與電機領域

並列摘要

This study investigates the relation between production of utility patents and scientific papers in the electrical and electronic (E&E) industry. Unlike most prior researches delving into the link between science and technology through patent citations and paper citations, this article takes top 20 companies in the E&E industry as an example to examine the link between science and technology in terms of the productivity of patents and papers in one company. It also probes into patent citations and paper citations respectively and its consequences. Furthermore, this approach analyzes the link between Technology Cycle Time (TCT) and Patent-Paper Ratio (PtPR) and adopts the modified calculation, Modified Current Impact Index (Modified CII), to fit patents as well as papers. The source data are retrieved from top 20 companies’ patents and papers granted by the USPTO and covered in WoS database for the period of 1989-2008. Results from this analysis demonstrate that there is little connection between productivity and impact of papers and patents of these top 20 companies. These findings provide new empirical evidences about the linkage between technology and science at E&E industry level.

並列關鍵字

Science and technology ； Patent ； Paper ； Electrical and electronic industry

參考文獻

Carpenter, M. P.,Narin, F.(1983).Validation study: Patent citations as indicators of science and foreigh dependence.World Patent Information.5(3),180-185.

Google Scholar

Collins, P.,Wyatt, S.(1988).Citations in patents to the basic research literature.Research Policy.17(2),65-74.

Google Scholar

Fleming, L.,Sorenson, O.(2004).Science as a map in technological search.Strategic Management Journal.25(8-9),909-928.

Google Scholar

Gittelman, M.,Kogut, B.(2003).Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns.Management Science.49(4),366-382.

Google Scholar

Hall, B. H.,Jaffe, A. B.,Trajtenberg, M.(2002).The NBER patent-citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools.Patents, citations, and innovations.(Patents, citations, and innovations).:

Google Scholar

主題瀏覽