China and the South China Sea ＂Lawfare＂

蕭琇安(ANNE HSIU-AN HSIAO)

《Issues & Studies》 52卷2期 (2016/06) Pp. 1650008-1-1650008-42

https://doi.org/10.1142/S1013251116500089

摘要

The strategic values of the South China Sea had long been recognized. More recently, the South China Sea has once again become an international flashpoint, as disputes take place in the context of a rising and perceived more assertive People's Republic of China (China) vis-à-vis a relatively declining US that seeks to retain its influence and interests in East Asia. This paper tries to illustrate the growing strategic role of international law in the geopolitics of the South China Sea at play-a subject matter that has so far been less explored-and to assess how the intensified legal maneuvers, or ＂lawfare＂ between China on the one hand, and other South China Sea claimants as well as the US on the other, reflect China's attitude toward the South China Sea dispute and may impact upon the peace and security in the region. It concludes that the ＂lawfare＂ since 2009, especially the South China Sea arbitration proceedings initiated by the Philippines, may have not only increased the uncertainties of China's behavior and China-US relations, but also made the situations in both East and South China seas more complicated. Moreover, Chlna's responses in the ＂lawfare＂ also suggest that China has become more ＂rule-of-law oriented＂ as well as hegemonic. The dual images of China raise some uncertainty as to how the South China Sea disputes might eventually be resolved.

關鍵字

International law ； power transition ； South China Sea disputes ； the Philippines vs. China arbitration ； US rebalance toward Asia

參考文獻

Agence France-Presse (AFP) Manila. (2014). Philippines halts South China Sea work. Retrieved from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2014/10/05/2003601351

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). (2012). ASEAN's six-point principles on the South China Sea. Statement of the ASEAN Foreign Ministers, Phnom Pehn, Cambodia. Retrieved from http://www.asean.org/images/AFMs%20Statement%20on%206%20Principles%20on%20SCS.pdf

Brierly, J.L. (1944). The outlook for international law. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press

China has legal basis for sovereignty over Huangyan Island. (2012). People's Daily. Retrieved from http://www.china.org.cn/opinion/2012-05/10/content_25348875.htm

Chinese Government's statement on China's territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests in the South China Sea [Second China Statement]. (2016). Xinhua News. Retrieved from http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2016-07/12/e_135507754.htm