透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.131.238
  • 期刊

竹內好的“自我介紹”:對抗亞洲內部的西方

Takeuchi Yoshimi's "Introduce Myself": Confront "the West" from Asia

摘要


本文藉由竹內好(1910~1977)的作為方法的亞細亞作為開啓竹內好思想的起點,竹內好提出東西方並非地理概念,要以亞細亞(亞洲)為方法,來幫助竹內好眼中的優等生一日本,重新找回自己的主體性,並列舉溝口雄三、子安宣邦、孫歌和陳光興對作為方法的亞細亞的回應,以彰顯這個命題的重要性,另外將分別就「文學與政治」、「東方vs.西方」、「日本vs.亞細亞」來介紹竹內好思想,文學是構築竹內好思想的關鍵,東西方關係談的是他的歷史哲學、是他面對自身問題的方式,他更關注日本與亞細亞的關係如何從連帶走向了侵略,本文希望藉由這樣的討論方式呈現一個竹內好研究的雛形。

並列摘要


This paper will take ”Asia as Method” as a starting point to open Takeuchi Yoshimi's (1910-1977) thinking. Takeuchi Yoshimi brought up East and West by no means geography concept and took the Asia as a method. This method can help ”mode student”-”Japan in Takeuchi Yoshimi's eyes retrieve own main subjectivity. In the first part, it attempts at a discussion of the methodological debates over ”Asia” among Takeuchi Yoshimi, Mizouguchi Youzou (1932-), Koyasu Nobukuni (1933-), Sun Ge (1955-), and Kuan-Hsing Chen (1955-). In the second part, it introduces ”Literature and Politics.” Literature is the key that constructed Takeuchi Yoshimi's thinking. In the third part, it introduces ”the Orient vs. the Occident.” The relationship between both refers to Takeuchi Yoshimi's philosophy of history and a way of facing him-self. In the last part, it introduces ”Japan vs. Asia.” Takeuchi Yoshimi concentrates on the relationship between both how moved towards the aggression from the association. This article hopes the affiliation by such discussion way to present a Takeuchi Yoshimi's research model.

參考文獻


陳光興(2005)。『亞洲』作為方法。台灣社會研究季刊。57,133-178。
陳光興訪談、陳祐禎整理(2003)。文化『間』實踐的可能性:與孫歌對話。台灣社會研究季刊。49,201-235。
孫歌(2007)。在大陸語境中『翻譯』竹內好-進出政治正確的中國論述。中國大陸研究。50(1),69-84。
葛兆光(2002)。想像的和實際的:誰認同『亞洲』?關於晚清至民初日本與中國的「亞洲主義」言說。臺大歷史學報。30,183-206。
Takeuchi, Yoshimi、Richard F. Calichman trans.(2005)。What Is Modernity? Writings of Takeuchi Yoshimi。New York:Columbia University Press。

延伸閱讀