透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.221.146.223
  • 期刊

「特殊國與國關係」之決策及其發展:3i模型的決策分析

Taiwan' China Policy Decision Making: “he Special State-to-state Relationship” and the “3i Decision-making Model”

摘要


自「特殊國與國關係」提出來之後,在國內外均引起不少之意見激盪。本文在不涉及意識形態之原則下,嘗試將政策分析的工具與國際關係理論結合,並以跨層分析(cross-level-of-analysis)之研究方法,來分析「特殊國與國關係」提出前之國內外原因背景,並進一步探討「特殊國與國關係」提出後之相關政策發展。基本上,本文認為「特殊國與國關係」之提出,是為因應美國總統柯林頓所提出之「三不政策」,及兩岸間即將來臨之政治談判。因此,本文將「特殊國與國關係」之決策視為一個「系統」,而此「系統」受國際與國內政治「環境」約制或鼓勵。作者認為「特殊國與國關係」之決人策,在本質上或戰略層面上是激進的(aggressive);但在其技術上或戰術層面上卻採漸進模糊(mudding through)的方式。此種戰略與戰術之微妙落差極易引起一般人之困惑與質疑。針對此,作者提出3i決策模型,以理念(idea)、利益(interest)及制度化(institutionalization)來說明「特殊國與國關弟」決策之過程。

並列摘要


The issue of “The special state-to-state relationship” between Taiwan and China has caused much controvery and confusion. Is the decision-making process behind the special state-to-state relationship lacking and premature or sophisticated and comprehensive? To answer these questions, we need to scrutinize not only international relations theory but also the theory of policy analysis. This includes a level-of-analysis approach to integrate knowledge between China-US-Taiwan relations and Taiwan's China policy. In this essay, I have created the “3i decision-making model” to illustrate the causal relationship among ideas, interests, and institutions in policy analysis. However, the 3i model does not suggest a linear relationship among these variables. Rather, we try to understand this model via David Easton's system theory, and take the feedback process into account in the context of Taiwan's China policy making. In brief, the 3i decision-making model suggests the difference between the strategies and tactics of the special state-to-state relationship. Taipei's decision makers, adopted aggressive strategies for this policy. Nevertheless, they have also deployed “muddling through” tactics to avoid pressure and opposition. The different approaches between strategies and tactics may partially account for the controversies and confusion of the decision-making process of the special state-to-state relationship.

參考文獻


(1986).Cooperation Under Anarchy.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
(1982).Patterns of Corporatist Policy Making.Beverly Hills:Sage Publications.
(1985).Bring the State Back In.Cambridge, New York:Cambridge University Press.
(1977).Planning for Social Welfare: Issues, Models, and Task.Englewood Cliffs, N. J.:Prentice-Hall, Inc..
Adler, E., Haas, P. M.(1992).Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program.International Organization.46(1)

被引用紀錄


黃文彥(2007)。外籍配偶教育問題分析與制度建構─以2002~2006台北縣為例─〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0204200815532145
蕭承訓(2010)。報紙報導與警政策略關聯性之研究─以清源專案為例〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-1908201015102300
王台魯(2011)。全球化下台灣移民問題之探析〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613495452
馬秋景(2011)。兩岸共同打擊跨境犯罪策略之決策分析與策略應用:(3+1)i決策模型的研究觀點〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613493527
林士清(2011)。從國家與社會關係析論ECFA簽訂之議程設定模式〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-0709201101540200

延伸閱讀