Should we view our evidences statically, or investigate evidence and inquiry dynamically? It constitutes the fundamental differences between evidentialism and virtue epistemology. Evidentialists propose a narrow view of justification, and argue that epistemic justification only concerns the relationship between evidence and belief, and has nothing to do with inquiry. In contrast, virtue epistemologists argue that evidence and inquiry can coexist, and reshape the relation of doxastic (personal) justification and propositional justification based on intellectual virtue. All in all, virtue epistemology reconciles successfully the increasingly sharp conflict between traditional epistemology and naturalizing epistemology.