透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.149.239.110
  • 期刊

結構-功能論的法律社會學-帕森思法律觀的析評

Parsons' Structural-Functional Theory of Law-A Socio-Legal Analysis and Critical Evaluation

若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本論文首述社會學與人類學中的功能理論,介紹墨頓顯性的與隱性的功能說,再簡介帕森思的生平、著作與學說主旨。接著描寫帕氏社會體系論中四大主要功能:適應、目標達致、整合與類型保持。法律作為社會總體系的次級體系,其主要的功能重在社會控制與社會整合。是故本文的重點在討論作為社會操控機制的法律之特徵,以及法律怎樣運用制裁、管轄、正當性與解釋的手段,配合法律的專業化來達到穩定社會總體系之目的。稍後,本文討論帕氏對契約、雇傭與財產權的剖析。最後,覆述帕氏法律社會學的大旨,評估其得失,以及後人在結構功能論以及體系論方面之發揮,以補充帕氏未竟與未逮之理論大業。

並列摘要


This essay deals firstly with the evolution of functionalism in sociology and anthropology. It then treats Merton's distinction between the manifest and latent functions. Subsequently, the focus of the article is on Parsons' theory of social system. Having discussed his career, major writings and essential theoretical contributions, the author dwells on Parsons' four functional imperatives and their relevance to the law as one of the social subsystems. According to him, the law as a mechanism of social control operates in a free and open society in terms of sanction, jurisdiction, legitimation and interpretation with the aid of the legal profession. In addition, Parsons' discussion of contract, employment and property right is highly enlightening and deserves a brief mention. Finally, the treatise critically evaluates Parsons' socio-legal model and supplements it with theoretical modifications and expansions by recent scholars, such as H. Bredemeier, N. Luhmann, G. Teubner and A. Podgorecki.

被引用紀錄


劉家丞(2015)。重新檢驗不真正不作為犯的可罰性基礎―以刑法中的侵害原理為核心標準―〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.01512
張銘耀(2010)。我國政風機構推動廉政建設之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2010.10779
翁志賢(2016)。組織變革對政風人員工作滿意度之影響〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-1005201615102096

延伸閱讀