透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.143.168.172
  • 期刊

清代考據學對日本古典文學研究之影響研探-以木村正辭《萬葉集文字辨證》為中心

The Influence of Qing Dynasty Evidential Scholarship on the Philology of Classical Japanese Literature: A Study of Kimura Masakoto's Man'yōshū moji benshō

摘要


據前人研究,清代考據學對日本近代漢學有不少影響。其實,其影響不一定限於漢學領域。木村正辭(1827-1913)是江戶、明治時代的日本古典文學專家。他以《萬葉集》研究而聞名,在學術史上佔重要地位。本研究以木村正辭《萬葉集文字辨證》為中心,來考察木村的《萬葉集》研究與清代考據學之關係。本文的研究指出:木村在《萬葉集文字辨證》中證實《萬葉集》傳本中的中國古俗字之存在,主張俗字不需要修改,不能妄改字。如上述俗字研究、校勘原則,其實受到了清代考據學之影響。木村以俗字研究為基礎的校勘,影響了後世的《萬葉集》研究。現代《萬葉集》的校勘在校勘方面留意於保存異體字、俗字,並且對於改字相當慎重。可說是清代考據學經由木村正辭而奠定了現代《萬葉集》校勘的部分基礎。此外,本文也指出:木村正辭與乾嘉學者在俗字觀方面另有差異。乾嘉學者在其校勘工作上認為:俗字需要訂正。木村受到狩谷望之(1775-1835)的影響而認為:古代日本人並不在意漢字字形的正俗,古書作者原來用俗字書寫,若修改俗字,則是屬於損失古書原貌的行為。這種差異可能來自於木村研究理念的根源-賀茂真淵(1697-1769)、本居宣長(1730-1801)的國學。國學對「漢意」、「後世意」的批判影響了木村的俗字觀。

並列摘要


Kimura Masakoto (1827-1913) was a scholar of classical Japanese literature in the Meiji era. His studies of the Man'yōshū are still famous, and influential. The Japanese scholar Kojima Noriyuki has pointed out that Kimura's studies were influenced by Qing era "evidential scholarship". However, this question has not been thoroughly investigated. Focusing on Kimura's attention to variant, unorthodox character forms in the Man'yōshū, the present essay shows that Kimura was influenced by the practices of evidential scholarship. However, he was also influenced by different approaches in Japanese scholarship, where greater stress was placed on the preservation of these variant character forms.

參考文獻


(1995)。續修四庫全書。上海:上海古籍出版社。
(1995)。續修四庫全書。上海:上海古籍出版社。
(1995)。續修四庫全書。上海:上海古籍出版社。
(1983)。影印文淵閣《四庫全書》。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
(1995)。續修四庫全書。上海:上海古籍出版社。

延伸閱讀