並列摘要
This paper finds that Demsetz (1973) conducted a defected study in testing his own efficiency hypothesis, and thus decides to re-examine the issue. Using the inspected relationship between large-and-small-firm profit discrepancy and concentration ratio may mistakenly judge collusion results to be effieient, or completely reverse the verdict. This skepticism is supported by our empirical analysis employing time series data of Taiwan's cement industry.
參考文獻
()。
Amato, L., Wilder, R. P.(1988).Market Concentration, Efficiency, and Antitrust Policy: Demsetz Revisited.Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics.24
Bain, J. S.(1951).Relation of Profit Rate to Industry Concentration: American Manufacturing, 1936-1940.Quarterly Journal of Economics.65
Bain, J. S.(1956).Barriers to New Competition.Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press.
Block, H.(1974).Advertising and Profitability: a Reappraisal.Journal of Political Economy.82
延伸閱讀
- 黃智輝（2008）。水泥課徵反傾銷稅的政策效果與競爭力分析－臺灣實證分析。臺灣經濟預測與政策，38(2)，1-30。https://doi.org/10.29629/TEFP.200803.0001
- 吳榮華、楊惠晴、陳家榮（2017）。臺灣水泥業發展之產業關聯效果研析。臺灣鑛業，69(3)，41-56。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10219927-201709-201709280011-201709280011-41-56
- 廖文正、陳振川、黃禾程、高健鈞（2023）。臺灣混凝土本土化收縮潛變模式沿革發展與研究。營建知訊，(483)，78-92。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10196129-N202304250010-00007
- 劉毅弘、潘子欽（2021）。台灣水泥業單位產品能源使用分析。燃燒季刊，(114)，61-74。https://doi.org/10.30041/CQ.202108_(114).0006
- 黃啟峰、潘子欽（2018）。台灣水泥業能源效率與替代燃料使用分析。燃燒季刊，(102)，67-80。https://doi.org/10.30041/CQ.201808_(102).0007