透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.149.254.35
  • 期刊

有限改革的政治意義:中國大陸動員式選舉參與對其城市居民參與意識的影響

The Political Consequences of Limited Reforms: How Political Mobilization Reshapes the Pattern of Participation of Chinese Citizens

摘要


自1978年以降,對岸的經濟改革,可說一日千里,但政治層面的變化,卻似乎相對有限。近年所推動的城鄉基層選舉,也多由國家動員、黨政主導,但如此的選舉模式,能否產生任何影響,爲未來的民主參與奠基?本研究即針對此問題,以上海2003、2006年兩次居委換屆選舉爲研究個案,探討此類動員式選舉參與,對居民「政治功效意識」與「社群歸屬意識」所產生之效果,進而蠡測對岸政治發展的前景。根據作者田野調查發現,經過兩次動員式的基層直選後,凡屬高度參與的社區成員,其功效意識與社群意識均得到強化,低度參與的社區居民,兩層面的效果也有些微進展。就此觀之,中國大陸的民主治理,或許會是黨國體制「有限改革」的動員式選舉下,所可能獲致的非預期後果。

並列摘要


Among the countries undergoing market transitions, China is rather unique in bringing together market economy with authoritarian governance. Facing the challenges of socioeconomic transformation, the Chinese party-state responds them with a series of political reforms aiming at strengthening the legitimacy and capacity of the regime. In urban areas, direct elections have been initiated to choose the Residence Committee. Although these elections have been institutionalized, citizens' participation in these elections is still being ”mobilized” by the party-state and therefore, the political consequences of these elections are considered as limited by most China scholars. This paper, after studying the 2003 and 2006 local-level elections in Shanghai city, however, points to a different direction, We find that the predominant ”mobilizational participation” has considerably reshaped the sense of political efficacy and community consciousness of many Shanghainese, especially those participate deeply and more forcefully. In other words, judging from our field data, the participation experience itself, no matter voluntary or mobilizational, will surely make difference. The attitudinal changes among Shanghai citizens thus should be considered, as the unintended consequences of an authoritarian regime to use elections to consolidate its legitimacy and power.

參考文獻


耿曙、陳奕伶(2007)。中國大陸的社區治理與政治轉型:發展促變或政權維穩。遠景基金會季刊。8(1),87-122。
吳重禮、湯京平、黃紀(1999)。我國「政治功效意識」測量之初探。選舉研究。2(6),23-44。
徐斯儉、何思因、陳德昇、耿曙主編(2003)。中國大陸研究方法與成果。台北:國立政治大學國際關係研究中心。
陳映男(2005)。當單位遇見居委會:中國大陸城市基層治理體制的轉型。東亞研究。37(6),157-182。
Brzezinski, Zbigniewk,Chen I-tzu,Harry Harding,Thomas A. Metzger,Michel Oksenberg,Arthur Waldron,Chun-tao Wang,Robert A. Scalapino,Suisheng Zhao,Andrew J. Nathan,François Furet,Shaul Bakhash,Robert B. Mattes,Vesna Pusic,Maxwell A. Camcron,Robert Hislope(1998).Will China Democratize?.Journal of Democracy.9(1),6-64.

被引用紀錄


梁鈞淳(2016)。後社會主義中國基層治理的細碎化變革—以廈門海滄新城社區的網格化管理為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201603042

延伸閱讀