透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.119.135.202
  • 期刊

Is Taiwan's Lowest-low Fertility Reversible via Socio-economic Development?

台灣的超低生育率可以透過經濟發展逆轉提升嗎?

若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究假設社經發展是人口數量改變的潛在機轉。在過去50年,台灣經歷了急劇的社經變化和快速的人口變遷。同步方程式因此被引用來整合社經因素探討對年齡別生育率之影響。估計所得的年齡別生育率再用來推計台灣2004-2033的人口。本研究的低與中推計結果接近行政院經建會同期間的中高推計,而兩者之高推計結果也接近。質言之,假如台灣社經發展呈快速成長總生育率有可能在2033年反彈到替代水準;假如社經發展呈中度成長,總生育率有可能回升到1.6;假如社經發展持續下挫,總生育率有可能維持在超低水準。

並列摘要


In this study, we assume that socio-economic development is the underlying mechanism for population changes. In the past 50 years, Taiwan has experienced drastic socio-economic changes and rapid population change. Simultaneous equations are thus used to integrate the effect of Taiwan's socio-economic factors on the projection of its age-specific fertility rate (ASFR). The estimated ASFR is then used to make population projections for Taiwan in the period 2004-2033. The results of our low and medium projections are close to the official (CEPD) medium-high projection for the same time period. The results of the high projection for both studies are rather similar too. Specifically, if Taiwan's socio-economic development grows at a high variant, its fertility would rebound to replacement level by 2033. If it follows the medium variant, fertility would rise to 1.6 births per woman. But if Taiwan's future socio-economic development grows sluggishly as in the assumed low variant case, Taiwan's fertility would remain at a lowest-low level.

參考文獻


Adsera, A.(2004).Changing Fertility Rates in Developed: The Impact of Labor Market Institutions.Journal of Population Economics.17,17-43.
Bongaarts, J.(1999).Fertility Decline in the Developed World: Where Will it End?.American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings.89(2),256-260.
Bongaarts, J.(2001).Global Fertility Transition, Population and Development Review-A Supplement.New York:
Bongaarts, J.,Griffith, F.(1998).On the Quantum and Tempo of Fertility.Population and Development Review.24(2),271-291.
Buttner, T.,W. Lutz.(1990).Estimating Fertility Responses to Policy Measures on the German Democratic Republic.Population and development Review.16(3),539-555.

延伸閱讀