透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.117.152.251
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

從Schmitt之民主理論論台灣三二○公投

Schmitt's Democratic Theory and Taiwan's First Nationwide Referendums

摘要


本文藉用Carl Schmitt之民主理論來探討、分析我國於二○○四年三月二十日首次舉行之全國性公民投票(下稱三二○公投)。全文主要分三個部分,首先係介紹Schmitt以其政治性概念為基礎所建構之民主理論。其次,則討論Schmitt之民主理論與公投間之一般性關係。以此討論為基礎,本文進一步探討三二○公投蘊含之意義,並指出其意義表現在以下四個面向上:(1)三二○公投的舉行係企圖藉由面對、正視中共(國)對台灣的飛彈威脅,喚醒人民之敵我意識,從而表達人民之意志,作出政治性決斷對中共說不。從某個觀點言之,在一定程度內此一企圖可以說獲得了實現;(2)但另一方面,三二○公投卻產生了反面的效果。它深化了台灣既存之國族認同分歧,從而類似於對內為友敵之區分;(3)再者,三二○公投的舉行形同是陳總統利用他本人等同於台灣此一代表性權威,提出「適當的」議題,而獲得其所代表之「人民」高度的肯認、信賴,並因此更加強化陳總統代表台灣及其「人民」之權威;(4)三二○公投表現出Schmitt所謂的依意志作出決斷之意義。

並列摘要


From the perspective of Carl Schmitt's democratic theory based on his concept of the political, this paper analyses Taiwan's first-ever nationwide referendums held on March 20, 2004. It concludes that the March 20 referendums have its unique significance in four respects: 1. The March 20 referendums were mainly aimed at confronting Taiwan's people with mainland China's missiles targeting Taiwan and, by means of this confrontation, to create the political entity of Tainwan's people. To some extent, the aim was realized. 2. However, on the other hand, the March 20 referendums paradoxically had negative effects. It deepened the existing diversity of national identity within Taiwan and verged on creating the internal friend-enemy distinction. 3. Schmitt defined democracy as the identity of the governed and governing. To some degree, Taiwan's democracy is imbued with the characteristic of Schmitt's concept of democracy. Under such condition, the March 20 referendums were exploited by President Chen Shui-bian to produce the acclamation from his ”people” and, through this, to reinforce the authority of his representation of Taiwanese people (or nation). 4. What the March 20 referendums expressed was ”decision through 'one' will” as Schmitt attributed to the meaning of the referendum.

參考文獻


徐永明、蔡佳泓、黃綉庭(2005)。公民投票-台灣國家認同的新動力。台灣民主季刊。2(1),51-74。
黃偉峰(2004)。從選票區位結構試探影響2004年「和平公投」之相關因素。台灣民主季刊。1(3),73-98。
徐永明(2004)。公投民主與代議民主的關係:以台灣經驗為例。台灣民主季刊。1(2),1-26。
錢永祥(2003)。公民投票座談會。政治與社會哲學評論。7,177-237。
中國時報,2003/11/28,A2、A3

被引用紀錄


徐子軒(2012)。國家民主化之國際社會化研究:台灣、貝南與保加利亞的比較分析〔博士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2012.01204
陳俊榮(2008)。論地方性公民投票法制問題〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2008.02385
喬玟敏(2007)。由瑞士的公民投票制度檢視我國全國性公民投票 之理論與實踐〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2007.03281
邱柏翰(2006)。我國公民投票法現有主要爭議之研究—兼論行政院公民投票法修正案〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0712200716113017

延伸閱讀