透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.22.51.241
  • 期刊

誰的杜聰明?從科學家的自我書寫出發

Who Is Writing Whose Stories about Du Congming?-Reconsideration of the Contemporary Images of Scientist in Taiwan

摘要


本文主旨,在於分析戰前杜聰明做為臺灣早期知名科學家的形象,如何透過種種相關的歷史書寫呈現。我首先將論證「臺灣名人」式的杜聰明書寫,由於過於依賴杜聰明自我書寫,因而也承繼了杜聰明將其研究侷限於實驗室中的敍述方式;這樣對科學家及其研究的書寫,則讓這些杜聰明立傳者錯失了從更寬廣的脈絡來詮釋杜聰明一生的可能,甚至導致一些有問題的描述。與此同時,參照近幾年臺灣科學史、醫療史的相關研究,我也將提出幾個重新思考科學家杜聰明其人、其研究的可能性,包括「國家社會外部脈絡」、「實驗室內日常操作」、「知識生產細部考察」、以及「科學研究與科學家性格」等等。這種種嘗試都試圖在科學家自我書寫外進行補充、修正、質疑甚至徹底改寫。但這並不代表我們必須全盤否定科學家的自我書寫。作為科學活動的直接參與者,科學家的記述自有珍貴的參考價值;然而從科學家的自我書寫「出發」,卻可以讓我們重新思考科學活動在現代社會所連結生成的種種效應,以及科學家作為一個「人」,在其中所扮演的角色。

並列摘要


This essay centers around the analysis of the diverse contemporary images of Du Congming, the most famous scientist in Taiwan during Japanese colonial period. In the first part, I will argue that the popular hagiological writings of Du Congming, which on the whole unquestioningly rely on the self-writings by Du himself, are inclined to portray scientific research as the activity confined to the laboratory and therefore they draw some problematic conclusions. Instead, based on the recently fruitful research into the history of medicine/science in Taiwan, I will suggest some alternative perspectives to reconsider the role of science and scientists in colonial period Taiwan, including the external contexts, the laboratory practices, the scrutiny of the production of scientific knowledge, and the personality of scientists. Being a personal participant in scientific research, the self-writings of scientist Du Congming undoubtedly is a valuable resource for our understanding of scientific activities; but departing from these self-writings, I try to locate these personal accounts and knowledge in their local positions and explore the political effect associated with and inspired by science in modern Taiwan. In the end, through a comparison between the two important opium researchers Du Congming and Lin Qingyue, I will characterize the importance of personality in scientific activities and try to appreciate their research not only in the laboratory but also in their daily lives. Scientists are not only scientists, they are also human beings, like you and I.

參考文獻


Epstein, Steven(1996).Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge.Berkeley:University of Californa Press.
Latour, Bruno(1999).The Science Studies Reader.New York and London:Routledge.
丸山芳登(1929)。臺灣の衛生事情と保健生活法。台北:杉田。
王世慶(1986)。日據初期臺灣之降筆會與戒煙運動。臺灣文獻。37(4),111-151。
宋光宇(1998)。清末與日據初期臺灣的鸞堂與善書。臺灣文獻。49(1),1-19。

被引用紀錄


詹雅筑(2007)。醫學教育與殖民社會:由臺灣總督府醫學校的出現談起〔碩士論文,臺北醫學大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6831/TMU.2007.00130
賴彥如(2017)。精神疾病的建構-自我反思,家人衝突 的敘說與病歷分析〔碩士論文,世新大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0075-1908201723502100

延伸閱讀