本文是筆者關於東亞近代歷史學演變軌跡研究的序說,而這一研究的根本觀點就是要從“制度內的學問”與“制度外的學問”相互對立、交融的動態過程,來把握東亞近代歷史學的演變軌跡。筆者集中探討在日本帝國大學形成的歷史學3分科(西洋史、東洋史、國史)體系的一部分“東洋史學”在20世紀前半期的東亞如何傳播和變形的問題,尤其是東亞歷史學(進而人文社會科學)的制度層面所隱含的殖民地性問題。分析東亞的近代歷史學,特別是東洋史學與國民國家關係的基本框架與殖民地性,不僅可以有助於我們克服目前所面臨的史學危機,進而也將有助於我們構建新的學問體系。在資本主義向全球擴散的形勢下,必須在把握正在起變化的國民國家的作用的同時,重新審視與此有關的歷史學的變化。在這裡,筆者認為,為了能夠同時擔負起適應和克服全球化的雙重課題,超越作為分科學問的東洋史學,樹立“批判的/歷史的東亞學”。
This work is a case study for a model in the circulation of modern knowledge in East Asia. In particularly, it is to discover how Oriental history, which has been a part of the tripartite divisions of history (Western history, Oriental history and national history) formed by the Japanese Imperial University, underwent a change. As the modern knowledge have been formed and transformed by interdependence and conflict between the study inside and outside the academic institution, I assert that the trajectory of Oriental history in two countries can be also well understood by same perspective. This article examines the study of history inside and outside the academic institution. Moreover, the article compares those aspects with the study of history in China. I expect that this study could contribute to visualize a new study of East Asian history, crossing inside and outside the existing academic disciplinary institution.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。